1,720,956 research outputs found
Katalog rubrycel i schematyzmów zakonów męskich i żeńskich z obszaru historycznych ziem Rzeczypospolitej za lata 1690-2008 w zbiorze Biblioteki Uniwersyteckiej Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego Jana Pawła II
Full text link
Katalog rubrycel i schematyzmów zakonów męskich i żeńskich z obszaru historycznych ziem Rzeczypospolitej za lata 1690-2008 w zbiorze Biblioteki Uniwersyteckiej Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego Jana Pawła II, „ABMK” 100 (2013), s. 55-179. Errata ważniejszych omyłek w tekście
Full text linkPełny tytuł:
Katalog rubrycel i schematyzmów zakonów męskich i żeńskich z obszaru historycznych ziem Rzeczypospolitej za lata 1690-2008 w zbiorze Biblioteki Uniwersyteckiej Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego Jana Pawła II, „ABMK” 100 (2013), s. 55-179. Errata ważniejszych omyłek w tekści
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Schematyzmy karmelitów prowincji galicyjskiej
Full text linkOkoło 1772 roku karmelici (Ordo Fratrum Beatae Mariae Virginis de Monte Carmelo) należeli do grupy większych wspólnot zakonnych w Rzeczypospolitej Obojga Narodów: liczyli prawie 1000 zakonników mieszkających w 59 domach. Zmiana sytuacji politycznej Rzeczypospolitej Obojga Narodów i rozbiory spowodowały, że udziałem zakonów w pierwszej kolejności stał się rozpad struktur prowincjonalnych istniejących do 1772 roku. Następnie, zgodnie z polityką zaborców wobec katolików, w Kościele dokonano kasaty zakonów: zlikwidowano znaczną część klasztorów i rozproszono zakonników. Ziemie przyłączone do Austrii stały się jedynym obszarem, na którym karmelitom udało się przetrwać w prowincji galicyjskiej do odzyskania przez Polskę niepodległości. Prezentowane źródło historyczne, jakim jest schematyzm (zwany też katalogiem lub elenchusem), wydawane było zwykle corocznie jako lista duchowieństwa diecezjalnego i/lub zakonnego. Dla wspólnoty karmelitów należącej do prowincji galicyjskiej w ciągu ponad 50 lat ukazały się (współcześnie znane) 23 roczniki tego rodzaju źródeł. Zawierały informacje o każdym z zakonników: imię, nazwisko, funkcje, ewentualnie stopnie naukowe, rok urodzenia, a w przypadku ojców – rok święceń kapłańskich. Ostatnią wiadomością o konkretnej osobie była ta podawana w wykazie zmarłych członków wspólnoty. Mimo że podstawowa zawartość katalogów karmelitańskich nie była zbyt bogata, to jednak daje ona podstawę do wstępnego określenia liczebności społeczności i podstawowych danych osobowych.The Carmelites (Ordo Fratrum Beatae Mariae Virginis de Monte Carmelo) were among the larger orders in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth around 1772: they numbered nearly 1,000 monks living in 59 religious houses. The change in the political situation of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth and the partitions resulted initially in the disintegration of the monastic orders’ provincial structures that had existed until 1772. Subsequently, in accordance with the partitioners’ policy toward Catholics, the Church saw the suppression of religious orders: a significant number of monasteries were abolished and monks were dispersed. The lands annexed to Austria became the only area where Carmelites managed to survive in the Galician Province until Poland regained independence.
The historical source presented here, namely directory (also known as elenchus), was usually issued annually as a list of diocesan and/or religious clergy members. For the Carmelite community belonging to the Galician province, (today know) 23 annals of such sources have been published in more than 50 years. They contained information about each monk: their name, surname, functions, possibly degrees, year of birth and – in the case of fathers – the year of ordination. The last information about a particular person was that provided in the list of the deceased community members. Although the basic content of the Carmelite directories was not very rich, it does provide a basis for a preliminary determination of community size and basic personal data
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
