2,437 research outputs found
Coauthor prediction for junior researchers
No full textResearch collaboration can bring in different perspectives and generate more productive results. However, finding an appropriate collaborator can be difficult due to the lacking of sufficient information. Link prediction is a related technique for collaborator discovery; but its focus has been mostly on the core authors who have relatively more publications. We argue that junior researchers actually need more help in finding collaborators. Thus, in this paper, we focus on coauthor prediction for junior researchers. Most of the previous works on coauthor prediction considered global network feature and local network feature separately, or tried to combine local network feature and content feature. But we found a significant improvement by simply combing local network feature and global network feature. We further developed a regularization based approach to incorporate multiple features simultaneously. Experimental results demonstrated that this approach outperformed the simple linear combination of multiple features. We further showed that content features, which were proved to be useful in link prediction, can be easily integrated into our regularization approach. © 2013 Springer-Verlag
Our collaborators, Instructions for the author, Revue objectives, Life Proyect
No full textNuestros Colaboradores, Instrucciones para el Autor, Objetivos de la Revista y Proyecto de Vida de la Revista Páginas No.89Our collaborators, Instructions for the author, Revue objectives, Life Proyect of the Revue Páginas No.8
Types of Scientific Collaborators: A Perspective of Author Contribution Network
No full textThe purpose of this study is to investigate interaction between collaborators within individual studies by measuring how they made contributions to their studies. Author contribution network is constructed based on the author contribution statements of 140,000 full-text articles in PloS by viewing every collaborator as a node and a shared contribution as an edge. Three types of contributors are identified: general team-players, factotums, and mavericks. The preliminary result suggests that division of labor widely exists in scientific re-search and the latter two types of collaborators are common in small teams.Made available in DSpace on 2018-07-12T15:28:19Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2
Lu-Chao_20180417_V01.pdf: 365239 bytes, checksum: 8e321b79b4d7f4e401a356426425f971 (MD5)
license.txt: 4802 bytes, checksum: 58353f9dd6876860dd5221f3d7872a95 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 201
Our collaborators, Instructions for the author, Revue objectives, Institucional repositories and 40 years of the UCP
No full textNuestros Colaboradores, Instrucciones para el Autor, Objetivos de la Revista, Repositorios Institucionales y Los 40 años de la UCP de la Revista Páginas No. 98Our collaborators, Instructions for the author, Revue objectives, Institucional repositories and 40 years of the UCP of the Revue Páginas No.9
The Hymn of the UCPR, Our collaborators, Revue objectives and Instructions for the author
No full textEl Himno de la Universidad Católica Popular del Risaralda, Nuestros Colaboradores, Objetivos de la Revista y Instrucciones para el Autor de la Revista Páginas No.78The Hymn of the Universidad Católica Popular del Risaralda, Our collaborators, Revue Objectives and Instructions for the author of the Revue Páginas No.7
Our collaborators, Instructions for the author, Revue objectives, Institucional repositories and 40 years of the UCP
No full textNuestros Colaboradores, Instrucciones para el Autor, Objetivos de la Revista, Repositorios Institucionales y Los 40 años de la UCP de la Revista Páginas No. 98Our collaborators, Instructions for the author, Revue objectives, Institucional repositories and 40 years of the UCP of the Revue Páginas No.9
"Collaborators’ Bill of Rights"
No full textCuratorial note from Digital Pedagogy in the Humanities: Teamwork and collaboration are key components of any project, particularly digital ones. However, clear models for recognizing team-member contributions to digital projects are not present within the humanities, what with its historical emphasis on the single author. As a result, the participants in the “Off the Tracks—Laying New Lines for Digital Humanities Scholars” workshop developed the “Collaborators’ Bill of Rights” with the fundamental principle that “all kinds of work on a project are equally deserving of credit” (par. 1). Anyone starting a digital project with other individuals will want to refer to this document to guide discussions about the different ways to recognize effort within the project. It could also serve as a foundational document for the development of project charters (see “Toward a Project Charter” and “The Iterative Design of a Project Charter for Interdisciplinary Research” as well as the Center for Digital Humanities’ “Student Collaborators’ Bill of Rights,” which is an artifact included in the keywords “Labor” and “Collaboration”)
Children of Dutch Nazi collaborators
No full textThis article looks into what happened to the children of Dutch Nazi collaborators after the liberation of the Netherlands in May 1945. The author first outlines the historical context in which these children lived and the manner in which they recounted and recorded their memories much later. In combination with new archival research on social-welfare policy and ‘re-education’ of former National Socialist youth, this puts the discourse that dominated the Dutch debate, that is, the discourse of the ‘innocent child’ harshly punished by society, in a different light. The framework of the innocent child being punished by a cruel society obscured our view of experiences that did not fit this mould. Furthermore, it made the values and norms that were current during the reconstruction period disappear from the picture: the bad memories of children of collaborators partly originate in policy that was considered normal in those days. This, however, should not obscure the impact of the vulnerable social position which these children experienced after the war
Designating Prisoners as Justice Collaborators in the Pursuit of Justice
No full textThis research studies is the authority of the prosecutor's office in determining prisoners as justice collaborators. This research is research with a normative juridical type, statutory approach, conceptual and comparative approach, as well as deductive legal material analysis techniques to analyze the types and sources of primary and secondary legal materials. The aim of this research is to analyze the urgency of the Republic of Indonesia Prosecutor's authority in determining justice collaborator status for prisoners and its concept. The research results reveals that this concept of regulating the authority of the Republic of Indonesia Prosecutor's Office in determining justice collaborator status for convicts is in the form of a concept. First, the concept of regulating the designation of prisoners as justice collaborators based on Law No. 8 of 1981 concerning Criminal Procedure Law. Second, the designation of convicts as justice collaborators with a benefit orientation as a legal goal. Third, the concept of determining prisoners as justice collaborators is oriented towards justice as a legal goal. From these several concepts, the author urges the immediate formulation of legislative regulations in Indonesia to fill the legal vacuum in determining prisoners as justice collaborators, especially the Indonesian Attorney General's Office and the Indonesian DPR to make changes (revisions) to Law No. 31 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law No. 13 of 2006 concerning Witness and Victim Protection. Also, the DPR RI also changed Law No. 11 of 2021 concerning Amendments to Law No. 16 of 2004 concerning the Indonesian Attorney General's Office by increasing the authority of the Prosecutor in determining justice collaborators for prisoners in this law
- …
