1,720,980 research outputs found
EFFECT OF ENDOGENOUS CHOLECYSTOKININ ON POSTPRANDIAL GALLBLADDER - REFILLING ULTRASONOGRAPHIC STUDY IN HEALTHY-SUBJECTS AND IN GALLSTONE PATIENTS
The postprandial release of cholecystokinin (CCK) regulates gallbladder (GB) contraction but little is known about the role, if any, of the still-elevated CCK blood levels on subsequent GB refilling. To assess the role of CCK in GB refilling, a CCK-receptor antagonist, loxiglumide, or saline were infused intravenously in a random double-blind fashion after the ingestion of a liquid test meal in 16 healthy subjects. An identical study protocol was performed in 10 GB ''contractor'' patients with radiolucent stones to ascertain whether the reported reduced CCK effect on GB emptying also affects GB refilling. GB volumes were assessed ultrasonographically in the fasting state and for 150 min at 15-min intervals after meal ingestion. GB volumes during postprandial refilling were significantly greater during loxiglumide than placebo infusion (P < 0.01), but they did not differ between gallstone and control subjects. In conclusion, postprandial endogenous CCK has a relevant role in delaying GB refilling, and this effect is not altered in patients with radiolucent gallstones
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Anorectal function in multiple system atrophy and Parkinson's disease
This study was designed to investigate anorectal function in Parkinson's disease and multiple system atrophy (MSA). After a standardized interview, 17 patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and 16 patients with multiple system atrophy (MSA) underwent anorectal manometry with a continuously perfused multi-lumen catheter, located to record pressures from the anal canal, and a balloon for rectal distension. Data were analyzed by observers blind to the neurologic diagnosis. Disease duration was shorter in the MSA than in the PD group (6 +/- 4 versus 10 +/- 5 yrs, p <0.05). Most patients reported a bowel frequency of less than three evacuations per week and some patients had fecal incontinence. Most manometric recordings disclosed an abnormal pattern during straining (a paradoxic contraction or lack of inhibition) in 13 patients with MSA and 11 patients with PD. Mean anal pressures and rectal sensitivity threshold were not significantly higher in the MSA group, whereas the inhibitory anal reflex and rectal compliance thresholds were within the normal range in both groups. Manometric patterns did not differentiate patients with MSA from patients with PD. Most patients in both groups showed an abnormal straining pattern, decreased anal tone, or both dysfunctions. In conclusion, our findings suggest that although bowel and anorectal dysfunctions do not differentiate MSA from PD, both abnormalities occur earlier and develop faster in MSA than in PD
XV International Symposium on Gastrointestinal Motility, 5-9 November 1995, Hotel Villa Pamphili, Rome, Italy
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
