1,721,031 research outputs found
Widespread morphea. A case treated with factor XIII
No full textAn 11-year-old girl with widespread and progressive localized cutaneous scleroderma was treated with factor XIII. The treatment was responsible for moderate improvement of the cutaneous lesions. This treatment has been until now used in systemic sclerosis and in generalized cutaneous scleroderma. However, given the lack of side effects, the treatment can be used, according to the authors, even in cases of localized cutaneous scleroderma affecting exposed areas or rather extensive
Neurologic abnormalities in two patients with facial hemiatrophy and sclerosis coexisting with morphea
No full textProgressive facial hemiatrophy or Parry-Romberg syndrome is a rare entity characterized by unilateral atrophy of the skin, subcutaneous tissue, and the underlying bony structures. This syndrome has many features of linear scleroderma en coup de sabre but is distinguished by more extensive involvement of the lower face and by only slight cutaneous sclerosis. We describe two unusual children with both atrophic and sclerotic changes of half of the face coexisting with multiple plaques of typical morphea. Both children developed neurologic disturbances with cranial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) abnormalities 2 years and 15 years, respectively, after the onset of cutaneous lesions. Thus considering that it may not be possible to correlate impairment in neurologic function and cutaneous disease, as illustrated by our patients, we emphasize the importance of an accurate follow-up
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
