1,721,576 research outputs found
Adenophallusia de Mello & de Camargo e Mello 1996
No full textGenus Adenophallusia de Mello & de Camargo e Mello, 1996 TYPE SPECIES. — Adenophallusia naiguatana de Mello & de Camargo e Mello, 1996. DIAGNOSIS. — TI with inner auditory tympanum; HWs completely covered by FWs. Male: FWs apical field reduced; supra anal plate bearing a median spine. Male genitalia: LLophi apex bilobate; EndSc flattened dorso-ventrally, EndAp absent. Female: lateral margins of ovipositor apex serrulated.Published as part of Campos, Lucas Denadai De & Desutter-Grandcolas, Laure, 2020, The Paroecanthini crickets (Orthoptera: Grylloidea: Gryllidae: Oecanthinae) from French Guiana, pp. 355-398 in Zoosystema 42 (20) on page 368, DOI: 10.5252/zoosystema2020v42a20, http://zenodo.org/record/396294
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
A relação das obras médicas e cirúrgicas do doutor Canto e Mello (Brasil, século XIX)
Full text linkOn June 21, 1852, in his thesis to obtain the doctoral degree at the Faculty of Medicine of Rio de Janeiro, Francisco José do Canto e Mello Castro Mascarenhas recorded the first systematization of medical and surgical works, published or known in Brazil prior to the establishment of medical schools in 1832. Despite its originality, this work is still little known in Brazilian historiography, and the list of selected books is also not extensively explored by those investigating the teaching of medical professions in 19th-century Brazil. Therefore, the objective of this article is to present, accompanied by a brief commentary on the author and the work, a complete and unpublished transcription of this pioneering bibliographic essay by Canto e Mello.El 21 de junio de 1852, en su tesis para obtener el título de médico en la Facultad de Medicina de Río de Janeiro, Francisco José do Canto e Mello Castro Mascarenhas registró la primera sistematización de trabajos médicos y quirúrgicos, publicados o conocidos en Brasil, antes de la instalación de las escuelas de medicina en 1832. A pesar de su originalidad, esta obra es todavía poco conocida en la historiografía brasileña y la lista de libros seleccionados tampoco es muy explorada por quienes investigan la enseñanza de las profesiones médicas en el Brasil del siglo XIX. Por ello, el objetivo de este artículo es presentar, acompañada de un breve comentario sobre el autor y la obra, una transcripción completa inédita de este ensayo bibliográfico pionero de Canto e Mello.Em 21 de junho de 1852, na sua tese para obtenção do título de doutor na Faculdade de Medicina do Rio de Janeiro, Francisco José do Canto e Mello Castro Mascarenhas registrou a primeira sistematização de obras médicas e cirúrgicas, publicadas ou conhecidas no Brasil, antes da instalação das escolas médicas em 1832. Apesar do ineditismo, esse trabalho ainda é pouco conhecido pela historiografia brasileira e a relação dos livros selecionados também não é muito explorada por aqueles que investigam o ensino das profissões médicas do Brasil do século XIX. Desse modo, o objetivo deste artigo é apresentar, acompanhada de um breve comentário sobre o autor e a obra, uma inédita transcrição integral desse pioneiro ensaio bibliográfico de Canto e Mello
A relação das obras médicas e cirúrgicas do doutor Canto e Mello (Brasil, século XIX)
No full textOn June 21, 1852, in his thesis to obtain the doctoral degree at the Faculty of Medicine of Rio de Janeiro, Francisco José do Canto e Mello Castro Mascarenhas recorded the first systematization of medical and surgical works, published or known in Brazil prior to the establishment of medical schools in 1832. Despite its originality, this work is still little known in Brazilian historiography, and the list of selected books is also not extensively explored by those investigating the teaching of medical professions in 19th-century Brazil. Therefore, the objective of this article is to present, accompanied by a brief commentary on the author and the work, a complete and unpublished transcription of this pioneering bibliographic essay by Canto e Mello.Em 21 de junho de 1852, na sua tese para obtenção do título de doutor na Faculdade de Medicina do Rio de Janeiro, Francisco José do Canto e Mello Castro Mascarenhas registrou a primeira sistematização de obras médicas e cirúrgicas, publicadas ou conhecidas no Brasil, antes da instalação das escolas médicas em 1832. Apesar do ineditismo, esse trabalho ainda é pouco conhecido pela historiografia brasileira e a relação dos livros selecionados também não é muito explorada por aqueles que investigam o ensino das profissões médicas do Brasil do século XIX. Desse modo, o objetivo deste artigo é apresentar, acompanhada de um breve comentário sobre o autor e a obra, uma inédita transcrição integral desse pioneiro ensaio bibliográfico de Canto e Mello.El 21 de junio de 1852, en su tesis para obtener el título de médico en la Facultad de Medicina de Río de Janeiro, Francisco José do Canto e Mello Castro Mascarenhas registró la primera sistematización de trabajos médicos y quirúrgicos, publicados o conocidos en Brasil, antes de la instalación de las escuelas de medicina en 1832. A pesar de su originalidad, esta obra es todavía poco conocida en la historiografía brasileña y la lista de libros seleccionados tampoco es muy explorada por quienes investigan la enseñanza de las profesiones médicas en el Brasil del siglo XIX. Por ello, el objetivo de este artículo es presentar, acompañada de un breve comentario sobre el autor y la obra, una transcripción completa inédita de este ensayo bibliográfico pionero de Canto e Mello
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
