1,724,279 research outputs found
Carlingford / revised in 1900 and published by Colonel Duncan A. Johnston
No full textCARLINGFORD / REVISED IN 1900 AND PUBLISHED BY COLONEL DUNCAN A. JOHNSTON
Ordnance Survey of Ireland (-)
Carlingford / revised in 1900 and published by Colonel Duncan A. Johnston (sheets 71, 72) ( -
Galway / revised in 1899 and published by Colonel Duncan A. Johnston
No full textGALWAY / REVISED IN 1899 AND PUBLISHED BY COLONEL DUNCAN A. JOHNSTON
Ordnance Survey of Ireland (-)
Galway / revised in 1899 and published by Colonel Duncan A. Johnston (sheet 105 & part of sheet 114) ( -
Aran Islands / revised in 1899 and published by Colonel Duncan A. Johnston
No full textARAN ISLANDS / REVISED IN 1899 AND PUBLISHED BY COLONEL DUNCAN A. JOHNSTON
Ordnance Survey of Ireland (-)
Aran Islands / revised in 1899 and published by Colonel Duncan A. Johnston (sheet 113 & part of sheet 122) ( -
Co. Galway/ revised in 1899 and published by Colonel Duncan A. Johnston
No full textCO. GALWAY/ REVISED IN 1899 AND PUBLISHED BY COLONEL DUNCAN A. JOHNSTON
Ordnance Survey of Ireland (-)
Co. Galway/ revised in 1899 and published by Colonel Duncan A. Johnston (sheet 104 & part of sheets 103 & 113) ( -
Ennistimon / revised in 1899 and published by Colonel Duncan A. Johnston
No full textENNISTIMON / REVISED IN 1899 AND PUBLISHED BY COLONEL DUNCAN A. JOHNSTON
Ordnance Survey of Ireland (-)
Ennistimon / revised in 1899 and published by Colonel Duncan A. Johnston (sheet 123 & part of sheet 122) ( -
Letter from Duncan A. MacRae to Miss. Richardson
No full textA letter from Duncan A. MacRae to Miss. Richardson with no date included. In the letter, MacRae thanks Richardson for two numbers of the seminar. MacRae also informs Richardson that he has enlisted for active service
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
