1,721,162 research outputs found
Tomas O Fiaich. Columbanus in his Own Words
Doyle Peter. Tomas O Fiaich. Columbanus in his Own Words. In: Scriptorium, Tome 30 n°1, 1976. p. 177
Kathryn Grabowski and David Dumville. Chronicles and Annals of Medieval Ireland and Wales. 1984
Doyle Peter. Kathryn Grabowski and David Dumville. Chronicles and Annals of Medieval Ireland and Wales. 1984. In: Scriptorium, Tome 40 n°2, 1986. pp. 314-315
Martin Mc Namara. The Apocrypha in the Irish Church
Doyle Peter. Martin Mc Namara. The Apocrypha in the Irish Church. In: Scriptorium, Tome 31 n°2, 1977. pp. 340-341
Kathryn Grabowski and David Dumville. Chronicles and Annals of Medieval Ireland and Wales. 1984
Doyle Peter. Kathryn Grabowski and David Dumville. Chronicles and Annals of Medieval Ireland and Wales. 1984. In: Scriptorium, Tome 40 n°2, 1986. pp. 314-315
John J. O'Meara and Ludwig Bieler. The Mind of Eriugena
Doyle Peter. John J. O'Meara and Ludwig Bieler. The Mind of Eriugena. In: Scriptorium, Tome 30 n°1, 1976. p. 137
Gearoid Mac Niocaill. The Medieval Irish Annals (Medieval Irish History Series, 3)
Doyle Peter. Gearoid Mac Niocaill. The Medieval Irish Annals (Medieval Irish History Series, 3). In: Scriptorium, Tome 31 n°2, 1977. p. 353
Martin McNamara ed. Biblical Studies : The Medieval Irish Contribution. (Papers read at General Meeting of the Irish Biblical Association, April 1974)
Doyle Peter. Martin McNamara ed. Biblical Studies : The Medieval Irish Contribution. (Papers read at General Meeting of the Irish Biblical Association, April 1974). In: Scriptorium, Tome 33 n°1, 1979. pp. 107-108
Martin McNamara ed. Biblical Studies : The Medieval Irish Contribution. (Papers read at General Meeting of the Irish Biblical Association, April 1974)
Doyle Peter. Martin McNamara ed. Biblical Studies : The Medieval Irish Contribution. (Papers read at General Meeting of the Irish Biblical Association, April 1974). In: Scriptorium, Tome 33 n°1, 1979. pp. 107-108
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
