117,413 research outputs found
Conclusiones ex l. unica, c. de prohib. sequestrat. pecun
No full textad quas pro insignibus doctoralibus in utroq. iure consequendis respondebit, Dominicus à Burmania, PhrysiusEinblattdruckEnthält 12 ThesenDiss. iur. Basel, 157
Repetitio l. naturalis D. de praescriptis verbis (D. 19,5,5)
No full textquam ... pro gradu doctoratus in utroque iure consequendo, publice discutiendam proponit Dominicus Martini, Leoverd. Fris. Ad 25. Augusti, horis, locoque solitisMit TitelrahmenTitelvariante gemäss MommsenEnthält 9 ThesenDiss. iur. Basel, 160
Pro Papa. Dominicus Conservet Eum
No full textPRO PAPA. DOMINICUS CONSERVET EUM
Pro Papa. Dominicus Conservet Eum ([1])
Exlibris: L. Ramann´s Liszt-Bibliothek. No. 146/2. ( - )
Titelseite ([1])
Noten ([2]
Repetitio L. 3. D. de Iust. & Iur.
No full textAd Mandatum Ampliß. Facultatis Iuridicae Pro Loco proposita, eamque Dominicus Arumaeus Frisius. In Auditorio ICtorum die 23. Februar. defende
[Liber ordinum] [Manuscrito]
No full textProcede del Monasterio de San Millán de la Cogolla (fondos desamortizados)Rúbrica, en h. [1] r.: "Item antifone secundum Romanos" ; tít. del marbete, en la misma hoja: "Manual gótico o muzarabe. 4 40 L"El nombre del copista es Dominicus, según consta en el explicit: "Dominicus scribtor memorare tu sacrificiorum offertor in infirmitate subiacens a mole meorum peccatorum obprimens presuiter uocor sed indignum nomine fungor queso me adesse memor", h. 123 rectoCuadernos de 8 h., salvo el último que es de 12 h. ; reclamos horizontales ; foliación moderna a pluma y en arábigos ; caja de escr.: 18/17 x 100 cm ; títulos y rúbricas con pigmentación en algunas de ellas; cartelas con fondo en color y letras superpuestas ; existen lagunas en el texto, que está incompleto y mutiladoIniciales primarias en tonos apagados, ornamentadas: relleno, antropomórficas, zoomórficas y lacerías ; notación musica
[Liber ordinum] [Manuscrito]
No full textProcede del Monasterio de San Millán de la Cogolla (fondos desamortizados)Rúbrica, en h. [1] r.: "Item antifone secundum Romanos" ; tít. del marbete, en la misma hoja: "Manual gótico o muzarabe. 4 40 L"El nombre del copista es Dominicus, según consta en el explicit: "Dominicus scribtor memorare tu sacrificiorum offertor in infirmitate subiacens a mole meorum peccatorum obprimens presuiter uocor sed indignum nomine fungor queso me adesse memor", h. 123 rectoCuadernos de 8 h., salvo el último que es de 12 h. ; reclamos horizontales ; foliación moderna a pluma y en arábigos ; caja de escr.: 18/17 x 100 cm ; títulos y rúbricas con pigmentación en algunas de ellas; cartelas con fondo en color y letras superpuestas ; existen lagunas en el texto, que está incompleto y mutiladoIniciales primarias en tonos apagados, ornamentadas: relleno, antropomórficas, zoomórficas y lacerías ; notación musica
Dem Geburtsfeste Seiner Magnificenz des Wohlgebohrnen und Hochgelahrten Herrn Herrn Franz Dominicus Häberlin Der Weltweisheit und beyder Rechte Doctors, Herzoglich Braunschweig-Lüneburgischen Hochbestalten Hofraths ... widmeten diese Zeilen Seiner Wohlgebohrnen Magnificenz gehorsamste Diener und Zuhörer T. L. Keinlin, B. R. B. aus Ulm. und J. H. L. Brüning, d. h. G. G. B. aus Altona in Hollstein.
No full textHalictophagus dominicus Cook, n. sp.
No full textHalictophagus dominicus Cook, n. sp. (Figs. 8–14) Holotype. Male deposited in CMNH. Type locality. Dominican Republic, La Altagracia, Parque del Este, 2.9km SW Boca de Yuma, 18 ° 21´51 ´´N, 68 ° 37´05´´; 26–27 May 2004; 28 May 2004; W, J. Rawlins, C. Young, C. Nunez J. Fetzner; semihumid dry forest, UV light sample 52114, CMNH no. 350,662. Description. Female, Larva and Host: Unknown. Male: Habitus shown in Fig. 8, Lateral view in Fig. 9. Color: Light to dark brown throughout; head and eyes dark brown; antenna lighter brown than head, pro- and meso-dorsum dark, almost black. Total Length: 1.87 Head: Head as in Fig. 8; Bulbous; clearly wider than the width of the pro- and meso-thorax; with large indentation posteriorly making head almost U-shaped in dorsal view, approximately 30 facets of eye visible in dorsal view; up to 70 facets total; head width (with eyes), 0.63. Mouthparts: Mouthparts as in Fig. 10; maxillary base length, 0.07; maxillary palp length, 0.08; Mandibular length, 0.05; hairs present on maxillary palp as are small sensoria visible above 50 X magnification. Mandibles are relatively large for Halictophagus and sclerotized. Antennae: Antennae as in Fig. 11; seven-segmented with flabella on 3 rd– 6 th segments. Length of segments including flabella: I, 0.09; II, 0.05; III, 0.35; IV, 0.28; V, 0.24; VI 0.23; VII 0.22. Thorax: Sclerites as in Fig. 8. Wing: Wing as in Fig. 12. Subcosta prominent; R 1 complete, intersecting dorsal wing margin approximately 2 / 3 distance to margin; R 2 heavy, with distinct curve, shorter than R 3; R 5 about two-thirds the length of R 4; MA extends approximately to the margin; MP present, extending about half way to margin; and CuA extending approximately ¾ to the margin; CuP is prominent, extending approximately 1 / 3 distance to margin. Legs: Shapes and dimensions of legs as in Fig. 6. Fore coxa length 0.23; fore femur length 0.28; fore tibia length 0.30; fore tarsi lengths I 0.09, II 0.12, III 0.11; mid-coxa length 0.26; mid-femur length 0.38; mid-tibia length 0.37; mid-tarsi lengths I 0.11, II 0.15, III 0.13; hind coxa length 0.13; hind femur length 0.34; hind tibia length 0.31; hind tarsi lengths I 0.11, II 0.14, III 0.31. Tarsi are all three segmented; first tarsi on fore leg thick almost square; all other tarsi narrow and elongated; all tarsi II and III arising from just before mid-length of the previous tarsi. Abdomen: Abdomen as in Fig. 8. Aedeagus: Aedeagus as in Fig. 17. Base only slightly wider than apex, strongly curved, length 0.14; lateral spur relatively short and straight, length 0.04. Diagnosis. Halictophagus dominicus n. sp. appears to most closely resemble Halictophagus americanus Perkins 1905. The aedeagus is similar in these two species in that they are both similar in length and shape. The thorax also has some similarities but differs in the shape of the scutellum, being somewhat pentagonal in H. dominicus n. sp. but very triangular in H. americanus. Other sclerites of the thorax are similar but with minor differences in shape and dimension. Additionally, H. dominicus n. sp. is almost twice the size of H. americanus. Halictophagus dominicus n. sp. and H. americanus resemble Halictophagus omani Bohart 1943 and Halictophagus insularum (Pierce 1908) in many characters. Halictophagus insularum differs from the others in having a tooth-like basal extension of the femur and H. omani has a head that is approximately four times as wide as the eye length. Halictophagus dominicus n. sp. also has a relatively large head that is wider than the first two segments of the thorax and the shape of its thoracic dorsal sclerites are clearly different form H. omani. Thus, Halictophagus dominicus n. sp. does not have a single character (like the extension of the femur in H. insularum) that defines the species but it is defined by a unique combination of characters. Etymology. The specific epithet refers to the type distribution of this species being the Dominican Republic.Published as part of Cook, Jerry L., 2013, Two new species of Halictophagus (Strepsiptera, Halictophagidae) from the Dominican Republic, pp. 569-578 in Zootaxa 3620 (4) on pages 574-577, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3620.4.6, http://zenodo.org/record/22292
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
No full textThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Square Dancing with the Stars to Enhance Dynamic Hirschman Linkages?
No full textIn this Presidential Address, the author takes the reader on a reconnaissance of his life and time as a regional scientist. He points out scenery he found scintillating along the way, hoping that some may pick up the banner and chew on a few of the ideas for a while. He suggests a revisit to Albert O. Hirschman’s notion of key sectors and more empirical analysis related to Marcus Berliant’s and Masahisa Fujita’s notion of knowledge creation and transfer.Presidential Address, San Antonio, Texas, March 29, 2014 (53rd Meetings of the Southern Regional Science Association
- …
