1,721,163 research outputs found
Long-Term Outcomes of Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome and Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease
No full textPatients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and nonobstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) have a substantial risk of subsequent coronary events within 1 year. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the prevalence, long-term outcomes, and adherence to oral antiplatelet therapy in patients with ACS and nonobstructive CAD compared with patients with ACS and obstructive CAD who had undergone percutaneous coronary intervention. Nonobstructive CAD was defined as an angiographic finding of <50% diameter stenosis in any major epicardial artery. These patients were further stratified into 2 groups: those with normal coronary arteries (0% angiographic stenosis) and those with mild CAD (0% to 50% angiographic stenosis). Major adverse cardiac events, defined as death, myocardial infarction, ACS leading to hospitalization, and nonfatal stroke, were recorded and compared with a historical control group of patients with ACS and obstructive CAD who had undergone percutaneous coronary intervention. Of 2,438 consecutive patients with ACS undergoing coronary angiography, 318 (13%) had nonobstructive CAD. Of the 318 with nonobstructive CAD, 160 had normal coronary arteries and 158 had mild CAD. Patients with obstructive CAD had experienced greater rates of major adverse cardiac events at 26 ± 16 months (16.6% vs 9.1%, p = 0.001), driven by a greater rate of myocardial infarction compared with those without (5.3% vs 0%, p <0.001). However, the rate of death, ACS leading to hospitalization, and stroke was similar. After adjusting for baseline characteristics, no difference was found in the risk of major adverse cardiac events across the groups. Only 50% of patients with nonobstructive CAD were prescribed dual antiplatelet therapy. In conclusion, patients with ACS and nonobstructive CAD remain at high risk of long-term recurrent ischemic events
Adjusted indirect comparison meta-analysis of prasugrel versus ticagrelor for patients with acute coronary syndromes
No full textBackground: Clopidogrel is beneficial after ACS. Recent data suggest the superiority of prasugrel or ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel. However, there is no comparison of prasugrel vs. ticagrelor. We performed an adjusted indirect meta-analysis comparing prasugrel vs. ticagrelor for acute coronary syndromes (ACSs). Methods: Randomized trials were searched in PubMed. The primary end-point was the composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke. Odds ratios (OR) were computed (95% confidence intervals). Results: Three trial (32,893) patients were included. Overall, either prasugrel or ticagrelor appeared significantly superior to clopidogrel for the 12-month risk of death, MI or stroke (OR = 0.83 [0.77-0.89], p 0.05), despite more frequent drug discontinuation (OR = 1.12 [1.05-1.19], p 0.05). Prasugrel was associated with a significantly lower risk of stent thrombosis (OR = 0.64 [0.43-0.93], p = 0.020). Ticagrelor was associated with a significantly lower risk of any major bleeding (OR = 1.43 [1.10-1.85], p = 0.007), and major bleeding associated with bypass grafting (OR = 4.30 [1.73-10.6], p = 0.002). However, the more clinically relevant risk of major bleeding not related to bypass surgery was similar with either prasugrel or ticagrelor (OR = 1.06 [0.77-1.45], p = 0.34). Conclusions: Prasugrel and ticagrelor are superior to clopidogrel for ACS. Head-to-head comparison suggests similar efficacy and safety of prasugrel and ticagrelor, but prasugrel appears more protective from stent thrombosis, while causing more bleedings. © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd
Pruebas de función plaquetaria en la práctica clínica: ¿estamos preparados para que pasen a la primera línea?
No full text
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
- …
