1,721,202 research outputs found

    Supplemental Material, SPPS720275_suppl_mat - The Arts as a Catalyst for Human Prosociality and Cooperation

    No full text
    Supplemental Material, SPPS720275_suppl_mat for The Arts as a Catalyst for Human Prosociality and Cooperation by Julie Van de Vyver, and Dominic Abrams in Social Psychological and Personality Science </p

    sj-docx-1-gpi-10.1177_13684302231174402 – Supplemental material for Intergroup contact and intended actions in support of disadvantaged groups: The role of affective processes and feelings of solidarity

    No full text
    Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-gpi-10.1177_13684302231174402 for Intergroup contact and intended actions in support of disadvantaged groups: The role of affective processes and feelings of solidarity by Zafer Özkan, Kristof Dhont and Dominic Abrams in Group Processes & Intergroup Relations</p

    sj-docx-1-gpi-10.1177_13684302241242095 – Supplemental material for Why leaders can be bad: Linking rigor with relevance using machine learning analysis to test the transgression credit theory of leadership

    No full text
    Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-gpi-10.1177_13684302241242095 for Why leaders can be bad: Linking rigor with relevance using machine learning analysis to test the transgression credit theory of leadership by Ben Davies, Dominic Abrams and Carola Leicht in Group Processes & Intergroup Relations</p

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Full text link
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    Author Index

    No full text
    Nao informado

    Reactions to Procedural Discrimination in an Intergroup Context: The Role of Group Membership of the Authority

    No full text
    The present research examined whether reactions to procedural discrimination (favoring self vs. favoring other procedures) are qualified by whether the authority is an ingroup or an outgroup member. We argue that because we tend to demonstrate ingroup bias in an intergroup context, we should react more positively when we are favored over an outgroup other than when an outgroup other is favored over us. Furthermore, we reason that because compared with outgroup authorities, ingroup authorities are perceived to be more related to us, we should react more strongly to procedural discrimination exercised by the ingroup authority. Across the two studies, results support our predictions. Results are discussed with reference to the social identity perspective and the group-value model
    corecore