107,457 research outputs found
Letter from Jno. P. H. Wentworth to Wm. P. Dole with a letter from R. H. Ford, 1862
No full textEnclosed the accounts of late H. L. Ford and a letter from R. H. Ford, administrator of H. L. Ford's estate regarding his accounts
John Dole portrait
No full textPhotomechanical reproduction of a portrait of John Dole, an employee of the Anti-Slavery League. Dole was first located at Cairo, Illinois, then at Evansville, Vanderburgh County, Indiana. He superintended logging camps in Kentucky and ran off slaves through Indiana. The image was collected by Ohio State University professor Wilbur H. Siebert (1866-1961). Siebert began researching the Underground Railroad in the 1890s as a way to interest his students in history
Recommended from our members
An invitation from Elizabeth H. Dole, assistant to the president for Public Liason, to Dr. Hector P. Garcia for the signing and reception for the 1982 Voting Rights Act.
No full textAn invitation from Elizabeth H. Dole, assistant to the president for Public Liason, to Dr. Hector P. Garcia for the signing and reception for the 1982 Voting Rights Act
Letter from F. H. Woods to Wm. P. Dole, 1863
No full textAsks for information in relation to the claim of H. P. Heintzelman
PATENTING PUBLIC-FUNDED RESEARCH FOR TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER : A Conceptual-Empirical Synthesis of US Evidence and Lessons for India
No full textThe question of protecting intellectual property rights by academic inventors was never seriously contemplated until the introduction of the Bayh-Dole Act in 1980 in the US. The Act allowed universities to retain patent rights over inventions arising out of federally-funded research and to license those patents exclusively or nonexclusively at their discretion. This particular legislation was a response to the growing concern over the fact that federally funded inventions in the US were not reaching the market place. In this paper, we present a critical review of the US experience after the Bayh-Dole Act and argue that the evidence is far from being unambiguous. We discuss the debate surrounding the Act the extent to which it was successful in achieving its objectives, the unintended consequences, if any, and more generally, the effectiveness of IPR as a vehicle of technology transfer from universities. We also discuss the limited evidence on Bayh-Dole type legislations introduced in other countries. A new legislation, along the lines of the US Bayh-Dole Act The Protection and Utilisation of Public Funded IP Bill, 2008 is presently before the Indian parliament. The paper presents an Indian perspective against the backdrop of the US experience in an attempt to draw concrete lessons for India.Bayh-Dole Act, public-funded research, universities, Patents, India
Letter from Thos. H. Quinan to Wm. P. Dole, 1863
No full textRequests draft for the amount allowed in settlements of his account, be made payable to Thos. H. Quinan at Baltimore, MD
Eben Dole portrait
No full textReproduction of a portrait of Eben Dole, who kept a station on the Underground Railroad in Lovell, Maine. The image was collected by Ohio State University professor Wilbur H. Siebert (1866-1961). Siebert began researching the Underground Railroad in the 1890s as a way to interest his students in history
Patenting Public-Funded Research for Technology Transfer: A Conceptual-Empirical Synthesis of US Evidence and Lessons for India
No full textThe question of protecting intellectual property rights by academic inventors wasnever seriously contemplated until the introduction of the Bayh-Dole Act in 1980 inthe US. The Act allowed universities to retain patent rights over inventions arising outof federally-funded research and to license those patents exclusively or nonexclusivelyat their discretion. This particular legislation was a response to thegrowing concern over the fact that federally funded inventions in the US were notreaching the market place. In this paper, we present a critical review of the USexperience after the Bayh-Dole Act and argue that the evidence is far from beingunambiguous. We discuss the debate surrounding the Act – the extent to which it wassuccessful in achieving its objectives, the unintended consequences, if any, and moregenerally, the effectiveness of IPR as a vehicle of technology transfer fromuniversities. We also discuss the limited evidence on Bayh-Dole type legislationsintroduced in other countries. A new legislation, along the lines of the US Bayh-DoleAct – The Protection and Utilisation of Public Funded IP Bill, 2008 – is presentlybefore the Indian parliament. The paper presents an Indian perspective against thebackdrop of the US experience in an attempt to draw concrete lessons for India.Bayh-Dole Act, public-funded research, universities, patents, India
Law Day 1987
No full textLecture delivered by Elizabeth H. Dole, U.S. Secretary of Transportation. Distinguished Service Scroll awarded to Charles H. Hyatt, Jule W. Felton, Jr, and J. Ralph Beaird
Rooks vs. Sophomores, 1920
No full textPhotographic postcard with an image of "rooks" (freshman class) playing a football game against Norwich University's sophomore class on the Upper Parade Ground on campus in Northfield, Vermont, in 1920.Title, date, and photographer identification from the postcard. Photographers identified as "Holder and Dole ~ '21, N.U. Studio" on postcard. Identification of "Dole" as Robert Heman Dole (1898-1938) is tentative
- …
