1,721,008 research outputs found
Is nano-TiO2 alone an effective strategy for the maintenance of stones in Cultural Heritage?
TiO2-based nanocoatings have been becoming more and more widespread during last years in Cultural Heritage: they seem to be able to keep stone surfaces self-cleaned and to prevent the formation of biofouling. However, the efficiency of these coatings is strongly dependent on the substrate (i.e.: porosity and roughness) and on the amount of TiO2. Thus, this study experimentally investigates on the self-cleaning and anti-biofouling efficiency of a nano-TiO2 dispersion (without any organic or inorganic additive) applied on six different types of natural stones (three limestones, two sandstones and one tuff) usually used in Cultural Heritage, where high porosity and roughness can be found and the TiO2 amount cannot be increased in order to avoid any chromatic variation of the substrate. Water was used as solvent so as to reduce the risk of exposition of hazardous materials and to eliminate any chemical action on stones. The self-cleaning power of the coating was evaluated by measuring its ability at discolouring organic dye Methylene Blue, while its anti-biofouling efficiency was assessed by an accelerated growth test under controlled climatic conditions of two algal microorganisms, namely Chlorella mirabilis and Chroococcidiopsis fissurarum. Results show that, even if the photocatalytic and biocide power of nano-TiO2 itself is well known in literature, its application for the maintenance of stones in Cultural Heritage does not seem to be an effective strategy, especially when stones are highly porous and rough. Roughness and porosity of stones, in fact, can limit the efficiency of TiO2, which is thus not able to powerfully keep the stone substrate cleaned or slow down algal proliferation
Selection of Candidates for Lung Transplantation: The First Italian Consensus Statement
Lung transplantation is a well-established treatment for selected patients with advanced chronic respiratory insufficiency. Recognizing those patients with end-stage lung disease who might benefit from lung transplantation is a crucial task. Considering the presence of inadequate evidence-based practice, international and national scientific societies provided consensus opinions regarding the appropriate timing of listing. The Study Group for Thoracic Organs Transplantation (branch of the Italian Society for Organs Transplantation) promoted and realized a Delphi conference among the Italian lung transplantation centers to provide guidance to clinical practice based on international recommendations. The experts from the nine Italian centers completed two rounds of standardized questionnaires (answer rate, 100%): 42 statements received a consensus >= 80%. The selected statements presented in this article are intended to assist Italian clinicians in selecting patients for lung transplantation
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Devastating fast-growing lung cancer after single lung transplantation
Patients receiving lung transplantation are at increasing risk for the development of cancer due to the administration of immunosuppressive drugs. We hereby report the case of a patient with a devastating fast-growing lung cancer after single lung transplantation for pulmonary fibrosis
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Self-cleaning materials for architectural heritage: application and characterization of TiO2-based coatings on stone surfaces
Catamenial pneumothorax: a novel thoracoscopic uniportal approach using a spiral device to stabilize the diaphragmatic prosthesis
Catamenial pneumothorax is a rare disease and probably underestimated from the epidemiological point of view; it is usually handled as a more common recurrent spontaneous pneumothorax. Surgery apart, there is no 100% effective etiological medical treatment.1 Despite a multimodality approach seems to be the best solution, surgery remains the gold standard. Particularly, the uniportal approach has progressively gained worldwide acceptance in this field
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
- …
