1,721,119 research outputs found
Evidence-based practice. Kanttekeningen bij de discussie tussen Arnold van Ammerik en Dirk Hermans over grondslagen en toekomst van de CGT
In 2018 publiceerde dit tijdschrift een discussie tussen Arnold van Emmerik en Dirk Hermans (Hermans, 2018; van Emmerik, 2018). Het ging over grondslagen en toekomst van de gedragstherapie en de VGCt. In dit artikel worden kritische kanttekeningen gemaakt bij de argumenten die van Emmerik en Hermans in stelling brengen
sj-pdf-1-epp-10.1177_20438087211068215 – Supplemental Material for An investigation of the concurrent and longitudinal associations between narrative coherence and mental health mediated by social support
Supplemental Material, sj-pdf-1-epp-10.1177_20438087211068215 for An investigation of the concurrent and longitudinal associations between narrative coherence and mental health mediated by social support by Lauranne Vanaken, Patricia Bijttebier, Robyn Fivush and Dirk Hermans in Journal of Experimental Psychopathology</p
sj-pdf-2-epp-10.1177_20438087211068215 – Supplemental Material for An investigation of the concurrent and longitudinal associations between narrative coherence and mental health mediated by social support
Supplemental Material, sj-pdf-2-epp-10.1177_20438087211068215 for An investigation of the concurrent and longitudinal associations between narrative coherence and mental health mediated by social support by Lauranne Vanaken, Patricia Bijttebier, Robyn Fivush and Dirk Hermans in Journal of Experimental Psychopathology</p
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Generalization of Fear and Anxiety: Introduction to the Special Issue
sponsorship: Preparation of this special issue was supported by KU Leuven Center of Excellence grant PF/10/005 to Dirk Hermans. (KU Leuven Center of Excellence|PF/10/005)status: Publishe
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
data paper: Direct and indirect effects of perception on generalization gradients
Here you can find the data of the paper:
Direct and indirect effects of perception on generalization gradients
Jonas Zaman, Eva Ceulemans, Dirk Hermans, Tom Beckers
Behaviour Research and Therapy 114 (2019) 44–50
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2019.01.00
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
