1,720,959 research outputs found
EPISTEMIC SEMANTICS OF -mAk vā/var AND –(y)IK PREDICATE MARKERS IN THE DIALECT OF AYVACIK DISTRICT IN ÇANAKKALE
論文The expression of inference and possibility of predicate markers -mAk vā and -(y)IK shows a close affinity in terms of epistemic modality. Modal predicate which is marked by -(y)IK points an inference from observable evidence and speaker makes a firm judgment based on that evidence. It indicates that the speaker is certain about his/her judgment which may be identified as deductive. On the other hand, the predicate marked by -mAk vā indicates uncertainity and expresses both epistemically possible and one's possible prediction. At this point, this paper aims to describe the semantic features and functional differences of the predicate markers of -mAk vā and -(y)IK in the dialect of Ayvacik district in Canakkale Province. Furthermore, the conditions that cause the semantic differences and similarities to occur between these two markers are examined.-mAk vā/var ile -(y)IK yüklem işaretleyicilerinin çıkarım ve tahmin anlamlarını işaretlemesi bilgi kipliği öğesi olarak işlev görmesi açısından bir ortaklık sergiler. Konuşur, -(y)IK eki ile işaretlenmiş kiplik yüklemini kullanırken belli bir delile dayanarak çıkarımda bulunur ve cümleye ifadenin doğruluğuna inandığı bir kesinlik anlamı katar. Ancak -mAk vā/var yapısıyla oluşturulmuş yüklemlerde konuşur, ifadesinin doğruluğuna yönelik bir inanç veya kesinlik duygusu sergilemeden tahmin ve ihtimal bildiren çıkarımları işaretler. Bu çalışmada Çanakkale’nin Ayvacık yöresinde kullanımına sıkça rastlanan -mAk vā/var ve -(y) IK yüklem işaretleyicilerinin, bilgi kipliği işaretleyicisi olarak ifade ettiği anlamsal unsurlar ile kullanım farkları üzerinde durulmuştur. Her iki yapının hangi koşul ve şartlarda kullanılırsa birbirine yakın anlamlar gösterdiği veya anlam farklılığı oluşturduğu incelenmiştir
ÇANAKKALE İLİ AYVACIK YÖRESİ AĞIZLARINDA -mAk vā/var VE –(y)IK İŞARETLEYİCİLERİNİN BİLGİSELLİK ANLAMLARI
論
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
