186,407 research outputs found

    Introduction: international entrepreneurship in the life sciences

    No full text
    No abstract available

    Data for 'Tandem Site and Size Controlled Pd Nanoparticles for the Directed Hydrogenation of Furfural'

    No full text
    Data in support of the article Scott M. Rogers, C. Richard A. Catlow, Carine E. Chan-Thaw, Arunabhiram Chutia, Nan Jian, Richard E. Palmer, Michal Perdjon, Adam Thetford, Nikolaos Dimitratos, Alberto Villa, and Peter P. Wells (2017) Tandem Site and Size Controlled Pd Nanoparticles for the Directed Hydrogenation of Furfural ACS Catalysis doi:10.1021/acscatal.6b03190 Funding by EPSRC: The UK Catalysis Hub (EP/K014706/1, EP/K014668/1, EP/K014854/1, EP/K014714/1), 2013 to 2016. Materials Chemistry High End Computing Consortium (EP/L000202), 2013 to 2018.</span

    Comparison of Au and TiO2 based catalysts for the synthesis of chalcogenide nanowires

    No full text
    We present a comparative study of Ti02-based and Au catalysts tor the physical vapor deposition of (Bi1-xSbr)2Se3topological insulator nanowires. The standard Au nanoparticle catalyst was compared to live Ti02nanoparticle based catalysts (anatasc, rutile, P-25, high surface area anatase, and Ti02 supported Au particles). The use of Au nanoparticles seriously harms the properties of nanowires. thereby limiting their application. In contrast, Ti02based catalysts lead to the residue-free growth of nanowires with a higher degree of crystallinity. Homogeneous nanowire ensembles are achieved with the mixed phase P-25 catalyst, and a possible growth mechanism is proposed

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    No full text
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore