1,720,962 research outputs found
Neorrepublicanismo: tensiones entre democracia y libertad política en el pensamiento de Philip Pettit
Punto de venta de la versión impresa: Servicio de Atención Central, Hall de la Facultad de Derecho (Avda. 18 de Julio 1824). Tel.: (+598) 2400 1918, 2408 2566, 2408 9574. Correo electrónico: [email protected] teoría republicana ha tomado relevancia en la filosofía política ofreciendo un marco interpretativo y normativo para el análisis de las instituciones políticas y sus fundamentos. Uno de sus mayores exponentes, el filósofo neorrepublicano Philip Pettit, defiende un ideal de libertad política recuperado de la tradición republicana, que pretende ser una tercera noción frente a la oposición berliniana entre libertad positiva y negativa. La libertad debe ser entendida como ausencia de dominación y no, simplemente, como ausencia de interferencia. La no dominación constituye el fundamento del modelo de democracia disputativa y es una de las más valiosas contribuciones a la teoría política contemporánea. Este libro ofrece un análisis crítico de la articulación entre libertad política y democracia, buscando demostrar que debido a su enfoque especialmente instrumental, tanto de la participación política como de la virtud ciudadana, su modelo de democracia falla en la defensa de dicho ideal.Comisión Sectorial de Investigación Científica (CSIC)Capítulo I. Libertad como no-dominación. El enfoque republicano: complejidad y tensiones -- El peligro de la dominación sui-iuris / alienis iuris -- Caracterización del ideal de no-dominación -- La relación de dominación -- Libertad como antipoder y contracontrol -- No-dominación y capacidades -- Los modelos rivales, cercanías y oposiciones -- Confluencias entre la libertad republicana y los modelos rivales -- Un aspecto clave: diferencias entre dominación e interferencia -- Diferencias que no son significativas -- Críticas desde filas republicanas -- ¿Qué ocurre con el ideal de libertad como no-dominación? -- Capítulo II. El modelo de democracia disputativa. La institucionalidad republicana -- Roles y formas del proceso político: contraste con el liberalismo -- Dispersión del poder: la doctrina de la división y la doctrina del equilibrio de poderes (checks and balances) -- Democracia electoral y contestataria -- No solamente votar: dimensión electoral y dimensión contestataria -- Disputabilidad y deliberación -- Condiciones para la disputa -- Libertad como no-dominación y fundamentación de la democracia -- Participación y virtud cívica en la teoría política de Pettit -- Formas de participación ciudadana -- La contestación como forma de participación ciudadana -- Límites de la disputación -- El lugar de la virtud cívica -- La virtud en la teoría política de Pettit -- Límites de la concepción de la virtud -- Normas sociales y ciudadanos virtuosos -- Capítulo III. Un aporte desde la perspectiva del Asociacionismo Crítico. La necesidad de un modelo de sociedad civil: el asociacionismo crítico de Michael Walzer -- El asociacionismo de Alexis de Tocqueville -- El planteo de Walzer -- La contribución del asociacionismo al modelo disputativo de Pettit -- Consideraciones finales
The place of civic virtue in Pettit’s theory and the needfor a civil society
Este artículo es resultado parcial de la tesis de Maestría en Filosofía Contemporánea, defendida en junio de 2017. Trabajos similares han sido presentados en los últimos años en instancias académicas.El modelo neorrepublicano de Philip Pettit sostiene que el diseño institucional de la democracia disputativa no es suficiente para la defensa de la libertad como no dominación si no va acompañado de cierta civilidad o disposiciones virtuosas compartidas por los ciudadanos, que los comprometa y motive para mantener una “vigilancia perenne” frente al imperium, es decir al poder estatal. Sin embargo, su especial manera de concebir la virtud debilita el rol fundamental que dichas disposiciones ejercen en defensa de la libertad política. Por ello se vuelve necesario, no sólo una revisión de la concepción del enfoque de las virtudes en Pettit, sino también la incorporación de un modelo de sociedad civil que ofrezca elementos vinculantes entre los ciudadanos para la empresa política de garantizar y promover la no dominación, así como para disputar aquellas decisiones públicas que la contravengan. Michael Walzer ofrece un modelo que contiene dichos elementos.Philip Pettit’s neo-republican model argues that the institutional design of disputative democracy is not sufficient for the defense of freedom as non-domination if it is not accompanied by a certain civility or virtuous dispositions shared by citizens, which compromises and motivates them to maintain “perennial vigilance” against the imperium, that is to say to the state power. However, their special way of conceiving virtue weakens the fundamental role that these provisions have in defense of political freedom. For this reason it becomes necessary, not only a revision of the conception of the approach of the virtues in Pettit but also the incorporation of a civil society model that offers binding elements among citizens for the political enterprise to guarantee and promote non-domination, thus how to dispute those public decisions that contravene it. Michael Walzer offers a model that contains these elements
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
