1,721,005 research outputs found
A possible selective impairment of magnocellular function in compression of the anterior visual pathways
No full textTwo parallel visual systems, the magnocellular (M) and parvocellular (P) pathways, originate from different types of retinal ganglion cells, and are known to be segregated in different portions of the pregeniculate visual pathways. Their relative contribution to two main cortical streams, dorsal and ventral, is still under discussion, but it is reasonable to suppose that selective damage to the M or P subcortical system might interfere with specific aspects of processing within one or the other cortical system. Using two different apparent-motion tasks, we compared the performance of patients affected by compression of the ventral part of the pregeniculate visual pathways with that of normal controls. In the first task, observers detected small displacements of a low-contrast vertical bar, while in the second task they estimated the visible persistence of moving dots. In the first task, patients were impaired with parafoveal displays, especially in the temporal portion of the visual field. In the second task, patients showed reduced suppression of visible persistence at long, but not at short, exposure durations. Three considerations support the hypothesis that these results represent a selective impairment of the M system. First, M axons are more likely to suffer from compression, particularly in the case of a mass growing from below since they are known to occupy a ventral subpial position in the optic chiasm and tract. Second, the performance of patients with a ventral compression is consistent with the characteristics of the response properties of P ganglion cells, which have previously been shown to exhibit elevated and unmodulated thresholds for displacement detection in the macaque monkey. Third, such patients are less sensitive to the inhibitory signals that suppress visible persistence, which probably originate in the M system
TRASCRITTOMICA COME FRAMEWORK NELLO STUDIO DI NUOVI BIOMARCATORI DI RESISTENZA A STRESS AMBIENTALI: L’ESPERIENZA DI LISTERIA MONOCYTOGENES
No full textListeria monocytogenes is an ubiquitous bacterium responsible of food contamination causing often severe consequences in immunocompromised or pregnant people. The infection is related to the consumption of ready-to-eat food but also fish, meat, dairy and vegetables. Most important, L. monocytogenes often exhibits persistence and resistant features.
In 2015 a severe outbreak occurred in central Italy causing several infected and death people. The responsible strain was identified in “headcheese” samples which, from the point of view of the bacteria, can be considered a stressor environment in terms of storage temperature, pH,
salt and concentration.
Using a transcriptomic approach, based on a differential expression study, we were able to identify key genes and protein modules responsible
of such a fitness. Although expensive and difficult to apply routinely, RNAseq analysis revealed its usefulness in functional characterization of
pathogens strains
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
