1,721,099 research outputs found
Evaluating Computational Gene Ontology Annotations
No full textISSN:1064-3745ISSN:1940-6029ISSN:1940-602
biosoda/voidext: VoIDext RDF schema
No full textThe GitHub repository of the VoIDext RDF schema, the extension of the Vocabulary of Interlinked Datasets (VoID)
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Inferring Hierarchical Orthologous Groups
No full textThe reconstruction of ancestral evolutionary histories is the cornerstone of most phylogenetic analyses. Many applications are possible once the evolutionary history is unveiled, such as identifying taxonomically restricted genes (genome barcoding), predicting the function of unknown genes based on their evolutionary related genes gene ontologies, identifying gene losses and gene gains among gene families, or pinpointing the time in evolution where particular gene families emerge (sometimes referred to as “phylostratigraphy”). Typically, the reconstruction of the evolutionary histories is limited to the inference of evolutionary relationships (homology, orthology, paralogy) and basic clustering of these orthologs. In this thesis, we adopted the concept of Hierarchical Orthology Groups (HOGs), introduced a decade ago, and proposed several improvements both to improve their inference and to use them in biological analyses such as the aforementioned applications. In addition, HOGs are a powerful framework to investigate ancestral genomes since HOGs convey information regarding gene family evolution (gene losses, gene duplications or gene gains). In this thesis, an ancestral genome at a given taxonomic level denotes the last common ancestor genome for the related taxon and its hypothetical ancestral gene composition and gene order (synteny). The ancestral genes composition and ancestral synteny for a given ancestral genome provides valuable information to study the genome evolution in terms of genomic rearrangement (duplication, translocation, deletion, inversion) or of gene family evolution (variation of the gene function, accelerate gene evolution, duplication rich clade). This thesis identifies three major open challenges that composed my three research arcs. First, inferring HOGs is complex and computationally demanding meaning that robust and scalable algorithms are mandatory to generate good quality HOGs in a reasonable time. Second, benchmarking orthology clustering without knowing the true evolutionary history is a difficult task, which requires appropriate benchmark strategies. And third, the lack of tools to handle HOGs limits their applications.
In the first arc of the thesis, I proposed two new algorithm refinements to improve orthology inference in order to produce orthologs less sensitive to gene fragmentations and imbalances in the rate of evolution among paralogous copies. In addition, I introduced version 2.0 of the GETHOGs 2.0 algorithm, which infers HOGs in a bottom up fashion, and which has been shown to be both faster and more accurate.
In the second arc, I proposed new strategies to benchmark the reconstruction of gene families using detailed cases studies based on evidence from multiple sequence alignments along with reconstructed gene trees, and to benchmark orthology using a simulation framework that provides full control of the evolutionary genomic setup. This work highlights the main challenges in current methods.
Third, I created pyHam (python HOG analysis method), iHam (interactive HOG analysis method) and GTM (Graph - Tree - Multiple sequence alignment)—a collection of tools to process, manipulate and visualise HOGs. pyHam offers an easy way to handle and work with HOGs using simple python coding. Embedded at its heart are two visualisation tools to synthesise HOG-derived information: iHam that allow interactive browsing of HOG structure and a tree based visualisation called tree profile that pinpoints evolutionary events induced by the HOGs on a species tree. In addition, I develop GTM an interactive web based visualisation tool that combine for a given gene family (or set of genes) the related sequences, gene tree and orthology graph.
In this thesis, I show that HOGs are a useful framework for phylogenetics, with considerable work done to produce robust and scalable inferences. Another important aspect is that our inferences are benchmarked using manual case studies and automated verification using simulation or reference Quest for Orthologs Benchmarks. Lastly, one of the major advances was the conception and implementation of tools to manipulate and visualise HOG. Such tools have already proven useful when investigating HOGs for developmental reasons or for downstream analysis.
Ultimately, the HOG framework is amenable to integration of all aspects which can reasonably be expected to have evolved along the history of genes and ancestral genome reconstruction.
--
La reconstruction de l'histoire évolutive ancestrale est la pierre angulaire de la majorité des analyses phylogénétiques. Nombreuses sont les applications possibles une fois que l'histoire évolutive est révélée, comme l'identification de gènes restreints taxonomiquement (barcoding de génome), la prédiction de fonction pour les gènes inconnus en se basant sur les ontologies des gènes relatifs evolutionnairement, l'identification de la perte ou de l'apparition de gènes au sein de familles de gènes ou encore pour dater au cours de l'évolution l'apparition de famille de gènes (phylostratigraphie). Généralement, la reconstruction de l'histoire évolutive se limite à l'inférence des relations évolutives (homologie, orthologie, paralogie) ainsi qu'à la construction de groupes d’orthologues simples. Dans cette thèse, nous adoptons le concept des groupes hiérarchiques d’orthologues (HOGs en anglais pour Hierarchical Orthology Groups), introduit il y a plus de 10 ans, et proposons plusieurs améliorations tant bien au niveau de leurs inférences que de leurs utilisations dans les analyses biologiques susmentionnées. Cette thèse a pour but d'identifier les trois problématiques majeures qui composent mes trois axes de recherches. Premièrement, l'inférence des HOGs est complexe et nécessite une puissance computationnelle importante ce qui rend obligatoire la création d'algorithmes robustes et efficients dans l'espace temps afin de maintenir une génération de résultats de qualité rigoureuse dans un temps raisonnable. Deuxièmement, le contrôle de la qualité du groupement des orthologues est une tâche difficile si on ne connaît l'histoire évolutive réelle ce qui nécessite la mise en place de stratégies de contrôle de qualité adaptées. Tertio, le manque d'outils pour manipuler les HOGs limite leur utilisation ainsi que leurs applications.
Dans le premier axe de ma thèse, je propose deux nouvelles améliorations de l'algorithme pour l'inférence des orthologues afin de pallier à la sensibilité de l'inférence vis à vis de la fragmentation des gènes et de l'asymétrie du taux d'évolution au sein de paralogues. De plus, j'introduis la version 2.0 de l'algorithme GETHOGs qui utilise une nouvelle approche de type 'bottom-up' afin de produire des résultats plus rapides et plus précis.
Dans le second axe, je propose de nouvelles stratégies pour contrôler la qualité de la reconstruction des familles de gènes en réalisant des études de cas manuels fondés sur des preuves apportées par des alignement multiples de séquences et des reconstructions d'arbres géniques, et aussi pour contrôler la qualité de l'orthologie en simulant l'évolution de génomes afin de pouvoir contrôler totalement le matériel génétique produit. Ce travail met en avant les principales problématiques des méthodes actuelles.
Dans le dernier axe, je montre pyHam, iHam et GTM - une panoplie d'outils que j’ai créée afin de faciliter la manipulation et la visualisation des HOGs en utilisant un programmation simple en python. Deux outils de visualisation sont directement intégrés au sein de pyHam afin de pouvoir synthétiser l'information véhiculée par les HOGs: iHam permet d’interactivement naviguer dans les HOGs ainsi qu’une autre visualisation appelée “tree profile” utilisant un arbre d'espèces où sont localisés les événements révolutionnaires contenus dans les HOGs. En sus, j'ai développé GTM un outil interactif web qui combine pour une famille de gènes donnée (ou un ensemble de gènes) leurs séquences alignées, leur arbre de gène ainsi que le graphe d'orthologie en relation. Dans cette thèse, je montre que le concept des HOGs est utile à la phylogénétique et qu'un travail considérable a été réalisé dans le but d'améliorer leur inférences de façon robuste et rapide. Un autre point important est que la qualité de nos inférences soit contrôlée en réalisant des études de cas manuellement ou en utilisant le Quest for Orthologs Benchmark qui est une référence dans le contrôle de la qualité de l’orthologie. Dernièrement, une des avancée majeure proposée est la conception et l'implémentation d'outils pour visualiser et manipuler les HOGs. Ces outils s'avèrent déjà utilisés tant pour l'étude des HOGs dans un but d'amélioration de leur qualité que pour leur utilisation dans des analyses biologiques.
Pour conclure, on peut noter que tous les aspects qui semblent avoir évolué en relation avec l'histoire évolutive des gènes ou des génomes ancestraux peuvent être intégrés au concept des HOGs
Variations on the Author
Get PDF“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Get PDFWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Get PDFWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
