1,720,954 research outputs found
Noble Samuel, Treiger Alexander (eds), The Orthodox Church in the Arab world 700-1700. An anthology of sources. Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, 2014
Dermarkar Salim. Noble Samuel, Treiger Alexander (eds), The Orthodox Church in the Arab world 700-1700. An anthology of sources. Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, 2014. In: Bulletin critique des annales islamologiques, n°30, 2016. pp. 123-125
Armenian catholics, from emancipation to schism : an upset identity at the time of the awakening of nationalities (1809-1888)
Peut-on être à la fois Arménien, membre d’un Millet ottoman et catholique ? cette question est sous-jacente aux multiples conflits qui ont émaillé l’histoire de cette communauté au cours du XIXe siècle. L’émancipation des Arméniens catholiques de la tutelle des Arméniens Apostoliques a donné lieu à un dédoublement de juridiction, avec la création d’un « Katolik Milleti » et d’un archevêché primatial rattaché directement à Rome et indépendant du Patriarcat Arménien catholique de Cilicie. Les Arméniens catholiques de l’empire ottoman, soucieux de réunion avec les Arméniens apostoliques, se sont partagés entre partisans de l’alignement sur la discipline latine et partisans du maintien des usages de l’Eglise Arménienne et d’une autonomie relative de leur institution patriarcale. Ces divisions ont connu deux moments de tensions extrêmes, entre 1847 et 1853, autour de la condamnation de la société Hamazkeyats (La Nation Unanime), symptomatique du Réveil culturel arménien initié par les mekhitaristes de Venise, et entre 1867 et 1888, avec la formation d’un schisme et d’une Eglise Arménienne catholique orientale à laquelle l’Ordre des moines antonins arméniens a largement contribué. Les deux séries de conflits sont marqués par la personnalité et le rôle controversé de Mgr Antoine Hassoun, archevêque-primat de Constantinople puis Patriarche des Arméniens catholiques, et par l’intervention de notables laïcs influents. Ce travail rend compte de l’étroite connexion entre ces évènements et ceux qui secouent l’Eglise romaine en Europe au temps du Printemps des Peuples, dans ses rapports avec les Puissances catholiques, avec le catholicisme libéral, et avec différents courants gallicans, et qui ont contribué au développement du catholicisme intransigeant. Les ambiguïtés et les limites des Réformes entreprises par l’empire ottoman sont mises en relief au cours de la révolte de Zeytoun de 1862, qui témoigne des résistances à la disparition d’un ordre local ancien, du rôle des missions franciscaines et des espoirs d’intervention de la France en vue d’un statut d’autonomie analogue a celui qui venait d’être accordé au Liban. Par la lettre apostolique Reversurus, Pie IX tente d’imposer une modification majeure de la discipline de l’Eglise Arménienne catholique en vue de l’aligner sur la discipline latine. La résistance à cette décision est à l’origine du schisme, qui se manifeste pendant le concile Vatican I, alors qu’une alliance se noue entre les évêques arméniens proches des dissidents et les évêques de la minorité hostile à l’infaillibilité. Le caractère spécifique du régime des Millets dans l’empire ottoman provoque l’hostilité de la Porte au Reversurus, accusé de porter atteinte aux droits du Sultan. Cette hostilité combinée à une forte opposition d’une partie de la communauté au patriarche Hassoun, provoque un long schisme interne. A la jonction des trois puissants leviers qui travaillent la communauté, le levier ethno-culturel, le levier politique interne et externe à l’empire ottoman, et le levier religieux, une reconstruction difficile de l’identité des Arméniens catholiques va se mettre en place au terme d'un long schisme, en attendant que les évolutions de l’ecclésiologie produites à partir de Vatican II ne viennent confirmer les intuitions des Arméniens attachés au maintien de la discipline de leur Eglise.Can one be both Armenian, member of an Ottoman Millet and Catholic? this question is underlying the multiple conflicts that have marked the history of this community during the 19th century. The emancipation of Armenian Catholics in Constantinople from Apostolic armenians guardianship gave rise to a duplication of jurisdiction, with the creation of a "Katolik Milleti" and a primatial archbishopric attached directly to Rome and independent of the Armenian Catholic Patriarchate of Cilicia. The Catholic Armenians of the Ottoman Empire, anxious to reunite with the apostolic Armenians, were divided between supporters of alignment with Latin discipline and supporters of maintaining the uses of the Armenian Church and a relative autonomy of their patriarchal institution. These divisions experienced two moments of extreme tension, between 1847 and 1853, around the condemnation of the Hamazkeyats society (The Unanimous Nation), symptomatic of the Armenian cultural awakening initiated by the Mkhitarists of Venice, and between 1867 and 1888, with the formation of a schism and an Eastern Catholic Armenian Church to which the Order of Antonine Armenian Monks has made a significant contribution. Both series of conflicts are marked by the personality and the controversial role of Mgr Antoine Hassoun, Archbishop-Primate of Constantinople and then Patriarch of Armenian Catholics, and by the intervention of influential lay notables. This work reflects the close connection between these events and those which shake the Roman Church in Europe at the time of the Spring of the Peoples, in its relations with the Catholic Powers, with liberal Catholicism, and with various Gallican currents, and which contributed to the development of uncompromising Catholicism. The ambiguities and the limits of the Reforms undertaken by the Ottoman Empire are highlighted during the Zeytoun revolt of 1862, which testifies to the resistance to the disappearance of an old local order, to the role of Franciscan missions and to hopes for French intervention, with a view to a statute of autonomy similar to that which had just been granted to Lebanon. With the apostolic letter Reversurus, Pius IX attempts to impose a major modification of the discipline of the Armenian Catholic Church in order to bring it in line with Latin discipline. Resistance to this decision is at the origin of the schism, which manifests itself during Vatican Council I, when an alliance is formed between the Armenian bishops close to the dissidents and the bishops of the minority hostile to infallibility. The specific character of the Millets regime in the Ottoman Empire provoked the Porte's hostility to Reversurus, accused of infringing the rights of the Sultan. This hostility, combined with a strong opposition of a fraction of the community to patriarch Hassoun, induced a long internal schism. At the junction of the three powerful levers that work the community, the ethno-cultural lever, the political lever internal and external to the Ottoman Empire, and the religious lever, a difficult reconstruction of the identity of Armenian Catholics will take place, long before the evolutions of ecclesiology produced from Vatican II confirm the intuitions of the Armenians attached to the maintenance of the discipline of their Church
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
