1,721,117 research outputs found
Bibliographie sélective de l'évidentialité
Nuyts Jan, Dendale Patrick. Bibliographie sélective de l'évidentialité. In: Langue française, n°102, 1994. Les sources du savoir et leurs marques linguistiques, sous la direction de Patrick Dendale et Liliane Tasmowski. pp. 121-125
Présentation. L'évidentialité ou le marquage des sources du savoir
Dendale Patrick, Tasmowski Liliane. Présentation. L'évidentialité ou le marquage des sources du savoir. In: Langue française, n°102, 1994. Les sources du savoir et leurs marques linguistiques, sous la direction de Patrick Dendale et Liliane Tasmowski. pp. 3-7
Les traits et les emplois de la préposition spatiale sur
Dendale Patrick, De Mulder Walter. Les traits et les emplois de la préposition spatiale sur. In: Faits de langues, n°9, Mars 1997. La préposition : une catégorie accessoire? sous la direction de Mary-Annick Morel. pp. 211-220
Pouvoir, un marqueur d'évidentialité
Liliane Tasmowski & Patrick Dendale : « Epistemic pouvoir, an evidential marker »
Taking into account the close relationship between devoir and pouvoir, we argue that epistemic pouvoir should be considered an evidential marker in the same way epistemic devoir is, which means that epistemic pouvoir signals information gained by inference. After a characterization of epistemic pouvoir along these lines, we address the problem of the influence of the conditional mood on both verbs.Tasmowski Liliane, Dendale Patrick. Pouvoir, un marqueur d'évidentialité. In: Langue française, n°102, 1994. Les sources du savoir et leurs marques linguistiques, sous la direction de Patrick Dendale et Liliane Tasmowski. pp. 41-55
La modalisation du discours de soi : éléments de description sémantique des expressions pour moi, selon moi et à mon avis
In this article we compare three expressions of modalization of the discourse of the speaker: pour moi, selon moi et o mon avis in exophrastic use. Semantically related, these expressions share the characteristic that they communicate a "view of the mind". They present however some differences of meaning as shown by their conditions of use. Pour moi fits best for the expression of completely individual views of the mind, sometimes having no link with reality and truth (Pour moi tu es mort). À mon avis and selon moi present the view of the mind as related to reality and truth, with a mon avis permitting the expression of spontaneous views of the mind as nearly instinctive reactions to a situation while selon moi presents them, on the contrary, as well weighed up, assessed.Coltier Danielle, Dendale Patrick. La modalisation du discours de soi : éléments de description sémantique des expressions pour moi, selon moi et à mon avis. In: Langue française, n°142, 2004. Procédés de modalisation : l'atténuation, sous la direction de Pierre Patrick Haillet. pp. 41-57
Ressource \ue9lectronique. Dendale Patrick, Lexicales. Bibliographie d\u2019\ue9tudes sur les unit\ue9s lexicales et grammaticales du fran\ue7ais, Universit\ue9 d\u2019Anvers (GaP), 2019 (\ue9dition 17, https://www.uantwerpen.be/lexicales
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
- …
