1,720,958 research outputs found
An Overview of Open Source Deep Learning-Based Libraries for Neuroscience
Full text linkIn recent years, deep learning has revolutionized machine learning and its applications, producing results comparable to human experts in several domains, including neuroscience. Each year, hundreds of scientific publications present applications of deep neural networks for biomedical data analysis. Due to the fast growth of the domain, it could be a complicated and extremely time-consuming task for worldwide researchers to have a clear perspective of the most recent and advanced software libraries. This work contributes to clarifying the current situation in the domain, outlining the most useful libraries that implement and facilitate deep learning applications for neuroscience, allowing scientists to identify the most suitable options for their research or clinical projects. This paper summarizes the main developments in deep learning and their relevance to neuroscience; it then reviews neuroinformatic toolboxes and libraries collected from the literature and from specific hubs of software projects oriented to neuroscience research. The selected tools are presented in tables detailing key features grouped by the domain of application (e.g., data type, neuroscience area, task), model engineering (e.g., programming language, model customization), and technological aspect (e.g., interface, code source). The results show that, among a high number of available software tools, several libraries stand out in terms of functionalities for neuroscience applications. The aggregation and discussion of this information can help the neuroscience community to develop their research projects more efficiently and quickly, both by means of readily available tools and by knowing which modules may be improved, connected, or added
BIDSAlign: a library for automatic merging and preprocessing of multiple EEG repositories
Full text linkObjective. This study aims to address the challenges associated with data-driven electroencephalography (EEG) data analysis by introducing a standardised library called BIDSAlign. This library efficiently processes and merges heterogeneous EEG datasets from different sources into a common standard template. The goal of this work is to create an environment that allows to preprocess public datasets in order to provide data for the effective training of deep learning (DL) architectures. Approach. The library can handle both Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS) and non-BIDS datasets, allowing the user to easily preprocess multiple public datasets. It unifies the EEG recordings acquired with different settings by defining a common pipeline and a specified channel template. An array of visualisation functions is provided inside the library, together with a user-friendly graphical user interface to assist non-expert users throughout the workflow. Main results. BIDSAlign enables the effective use of public EEG datasets, providing valuable medical insights, even for non-experts in the field. Results from applying the library to datasets from OpenNeuro demonstrate its ability to extract significant medical knowledge through an end-to-end workflow, facilitating group analysis, visual comparison and statistical testing. Significance. BIDSAlign solves the lack of large EEG datasets by aligning multiple datasets to a standard template. This unlocks the potential of public EEG data for training DL models. It paves the way to promising contributions based on DL to clinical and non-clinical EEG research, offering insights that can inform neurological disease diagnosis and treatment strategies
The role of data partitioning on the performance of EEG-based deep learning models in supervised cross-subject analysis: A preliminary study
No full textDeep learning is significantly advancing the analysis of electroencephalography (EEG) data by effectively discovering highly nonlinear patterns within the signals. Data partitioning and cross-validation are crucial for assessing model performance and ensuring study comparability, as they can produce varied results and data leakage due to specific signal properties (e.g., biometric). Such variability in model evaluation leads to incomparable studies and, increasingly, overestimated performance claims, which are detrimental to the field. Nevertheless, no comprehensive guidelines for proper data partitioning and cross-validation exist in the domain, nor is there a quantitative evaluation of the impact of different approaches on model accuracy, reliability, and generalizability. To assist researchers in identifying optimal experimental strategies, this paper thoroughly investigates the role of data partitioning and cross-validation in evaluating EEG deep learning models. Five cross-validation settings are compared across three supervised cross-subject classification tasks (brain-computer interfaces, Parkinson's, and Alzheimer's disease classification) and four established architectures of increasing complexity (ShallowConvNet, EEGNet, DeepConvNet, and Temporal-based ResNet). The comparison of over 100,000 trained models underscores, first, the importance of using subject-based cross-validation strategies for evaluating EEG deep learning architectures, except when within-subject analyses are acceptable (e.g., BCI). Second, it highlights the greater reliability of nested approaches (e.g., N-LNSO) compared to non-nested counterparts, which are prone to data leakage and favor larger models overfitting to validation data. In conclusion, this work provides EEG deep learning researchers with an analysis of data partitioning and cross-validation and offers guidelines to avoid data leakage, currently undermining the domain with potentially overestimated performance claims
xEEGNet: towards explainable AI in EEG dementia classification
No full textObjective. This work presents xEEGNet, a novel, compact, and explainable neural network for electroencephalography (EEG) data analysis. It is fully interpretable and reduces overfitting through a major parameter reduction. Approach. As an applicative use case to develop our model, we focused on the classification of common dementia conditions, Alzheimer's and frontotemporal dementia, versus controls. xEEGNet, however, is broadly applicable to other neurological conditions involving spectral alterations. We used ShallowNet, a simple and popular model in the EEGNet family, as a starting point. Its structure was analyzed and gradually modified to move from a 'black box' model to a more transparent one, without compromising performance. The learned kernels and weights were analyzed from a clinical standpoint to assess their medical significance. Model variants, including ShallowNet and the final xEEGNet, were evaluated using a robust nested-leave-n-subjects out cross-validation for unbiased performance estimates. Variability across data splits was explained using the embedded EEG representations, grouped by class and set, with pairwise separability to quantify group distinction. Overfitting was measured through training-validation loss correlation and training speed. Main results. xEEGNet uses only 168 parameters, 200 times fewer than ShallowNet, yet retains interpretability, resists overfitting, achieves comparable median performance (-1.5%), and reduces performance variability across splits. This variability is explained by the embedded EEG representations: higher accuracy correlates with greater separation between test-set controls and Alzheimer's cases, without significant influence from the training data. Significance. The capability of xEEGNet to filter specific EEG bands, learns band specific topographies and use the right EEG spectral bands for disease classification demonstrates its interpretability. While big deep learning models are typically prioritized for performance, this study shows that smaller architectures like xEEGNet can be equally effective in pathology classification, using EEG data
The More, the Better? Evaluating the Role of EEG Preprocessing for Deep Learning Applications
No full textThe last decade has witnessed a notable surge in deep learning applications for electroencephalography (EEG) data analysis, showing promising improvements over conventional statistical techniques. However, deep learning models can underperform if trained with bad processed data. Preprocessing is crucial for EEG data analysis, yet there is no consensus on the optimal strategies in deep learning scenarios, leading to uncertainty about the extent of preprocessing required for optimal results. This study is the first to thoroughly investigate the effects of EEG preprocessing in deep learning applications, drafting guidelines for future research. It evaluates the effects of varying preprocessing levels, from raw and minimally filtered data to complex pipelines with automated artifact removal algorithms. Six classification tasks (eye blinking, motor imagery, Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s disease, sleep deprivation, and first episode psychosis) and four established EEG architectures were considered for the evaluation. The analysis of 4800 trained models revealed statistical differences between preprocessing pipelines at the intra-task level for each model and at the inter-task level for the largest model. Models trained on raw data consistently performed poorly, always ranking last in average scores. In addition, models seem to benefit more from minimal pipelines without artifact handling methods. These findings suggest that EEG artifacts may affect the performance and generalizability of deep neural networks
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
- …
