1,720,954 research outputs found
PRACTICES AND POLICIES USED IN MANAGEMENT OF CUBA AND AUSTRALIA’S CORAL REEFS CAN WE SAVE THEM?
Full text linkClimate change is rapidly and significantly impacting the planet and the ocean in harmful ways. (Environment U.N., 2017). (NOAA, 2019). (NASA, 2024). (Nature Conservancy, n.d.). The Earth’s average surface temperature in 2024 was the warmest on record, according to an analysis led by NASA scientists. (2024). Coral reefs are experiencing negative climate impacts more quickly and more severely than the ocean in total. Our research addresses global coral threats like ocean warming, acidification, and extreme storms, plus local threats like overfishing, marine migration, invasive species, pollution, and excess nutrients. We have shown how coral reef threats, management practices, and resilience in Cuba and Australia impact the health and restoration of coral reefs. We focused this Capstone project on these elements of reef management: threats, practices, and resilience.
Coral reefs provide value to our society as a home and food source for 25% of marine life. (Loiacono, 2024). Coral reefs support industry in terms of fishing, tourism, and recreation. Water sports are enhanced by the mystery, bounty, and beauty of coral reefs. (Loiacono, 2024). Currently, 30 - 50% of coral reefs have been destroyed globally. Climate change and local threats greatly weaken coral reefs leading to damage, disease, and death. (Environment U.N., 2017). (NOAA, 2019). (NASA, 2024). (Nature Conservancy, n.d.). Reef management practices provide options to preserve, recover, and save these amazing coral reef ecosystems. Local management priorities for Cuba and Australia include Marine Protected Areas (MPAs), multi-purpose objective setting, bioscience solutions, and ecological role management. These significant actions can provide value to other coral areas. Climate action is a topic for further research
PRACTICES AND POLICIES USED IN MANAGEMENT OF CUBA AND AUSTRALIA’S CORAL REEFS CAN WE SAVE THEM?
Full text linkClimate change is rapidly and significantly impacting the planet and the ocean in harmful ways. (Environment U.N., 2017). (NOAA, 2019). (NASA, 2024). (Nature Conservancy, n.d.). The Earth’s average surface temperature in 2024 was the warmest on record, according to an analysis led by NASA scientists. (2024). Coral reefs are experiencing negative climate impacts more quickly and more severely than the ocean in total. Our research addresses global coral threats like ocean warming, acidification, and extreme storms, plus local threats like overfishing, marine migration, invasive species, pollution, and excess nutrients. We have shown how coral reef threats, management practices, and resilience in Cuba and Australia impact the health and restoration of coral reefs. We focused this Capstone project on these elements of reef management: threats, practices, and resilience.
Coral reefs provide value to our society as a home and food source for 25% of marine life. (Loiacono, 2024). Coral reefs support industry in terms of fishing, tourism, and recreation. Water sports are enhanced by the mystery, bounty, and beauty of coral reefs. (Loiacono, 2024). Currently, 30 - 50% of coral reefs have been destroyed globally. Climate change and local threats greatly weaken coral reefs leading to damage, disease, and death. (Environment U.N., 2017). (NOAA, 2019). (NASA, 2024). (Nature Conservancy, n.d.). Reef management practices provide options to preserve, recover, and save these amazing coral reef ecosystems. Local management priorities for Cuba and Australia include Marine Protected Areas (MPAs), multi-purpose objective setting, bioscience solutions, and ecological role management. These significant actions can provide value to other coral areas. Climate action is a topic for further research
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
