4,072 research outputs found
La transizione ecologica dal Green Deal alla Costituzione. Un modello di sviluppo per l’Unione
Il contributo ha ad oggetto l’analisi dei riflessi dell’affermazione del concetto di transizione ecologica che, al centro degli interventi del NGEU, tenta di superare la prospettiva della tradizionale separazione e contrapposizione tra ambiente e sviluppo, per proporre un modello di sviluppo sociale ed economico fondato su una logica di integrazione delle politiche ambientali. La transizione ecologica ripensa la costituzione economica europea nel senso della sostenibilità, ma influenza anche la definizione di un nuovo equilibrio tra poteri pubblici e mercato, con la riforma dell’art. 41 che nell’ambiente non individua solo un limite, ma anche un obiettivo che richiede l’intervento pubblico. Nella dimensione valoriale e solidarista, l’art. 41 Cost. richiama alla responsabilità attori pubblici ed economici, conferendo concretezza a quella responsabilità della “Repubblica” di fronte alle generazioni future (secondo il nuovo co. 3 dell’art. 9 Cost.). Nella prospettiva costituzionale, la transizione ecologica costituisce un fattore di inclusione sociale e di democratizzazione dell’economia che mette in luce la rinnovata responsabilità dello Stato nel cogliere le opportunità del NGEU e nell’elaborare modelli in grado di sviluppare attività economiche guidate dai principi di solidarietà ed equità ambientale
L'intervento pubblico nell'economia tra solidarietà, vincolo esterno e questione ambientale
AxCaliber_3D
Software to analyse diffusion weighted MRI data collected with varying b-value/diffusion times to fit the AxCaliber model for white matter diffusion by Barazany et al. 2009, adapted for including different fiber orientations (De Santis et al, EMBC 2019)Axcaliber folder: compiled Matlab script.-- axcaliber.cluster.sh: shell script to point to data and run the software.-- Motherscriptnew.sh: shell script to point to the matlab runtime (has to be v851).Peer reviewe
Anagyrus malenotus De Santis 1972
Anagyrus malenotus (De Santis, 1972) (Figs 27–29) Leptomastix malenotus De Santis 1972: 44 –45, 46 (illustration of female antenna). Type locality: Loreto, Misiones, Argentina. Subsequent references: De Santis 1979: 185 (catalog); Loiácono et al. 2001: 154 (type information). Apoanagyrus malenotus (De Santis): Noyes 1980: 176 (brief discussion); Kerrich 1982: 413 (discussion), 415 (key); Noyes & Hayat 1994: 305 (revived combination). Epidinocarsis malenotus (De Santis): Noyes & Hayat 1984: 273. Anagyrus malenotus (De Santis): Noyes 2000: 29, 71 (mentioned). Type material examined. Holotype female [MLPA] on slide (Fig. 27) labeled: 1. “LORETO (Prov. de Misiones) Col. Ogloblin 10 -V- 1932 2682 / 1 [in pencil, MLPA type number added later]”; 2. “ Leptomastix malenotus Det. De Santis HOLOTIPO ♀ MUSEO DE LA PLATA ”. The holotype (Fig. 29) is in fair condition although poorly cleared, mounted dorsoventrally. Distribution. Argentina: Misiones (De Santis 1972). Hosts. Unknown. Taxonomic notes. This species was described from a single female (De Santis 1972). Both Noyes (1980, 2000) and Kerrich (1982) considered the possibility that it might be a mere color form of A. diversicornis (Howard). Although this is possible, we are not able to properly assess intraspecific variability in A. diversicornis or A. montivagus (De Santis). For practical reasons we prefer to keep all three names as valid, separating the putative species as indicated in the key. The holotype of A. malenotus has the fore wing (Fig. 29) about 2.6 × as long as wide, whereas in A. diversicornis it is about 2.5 × as long as wide (Noyes 2000). However, coloration of flagellar segments of the female antennae differs between the two. Some other morphological features of the holotype of A. malenotus are as follows: antenna (Figs 28, 29) with scape slender and with a dark brown band in the middle, its length (minus radicle) equal to combined length of F 1 –F 3; apex of pedicel white; F 1 dark brown, F 2 –F 6 and clava pale or light brownish; funicular segments and clava with mps (F 1 with 1 short mps at apex, F 2 with 3, F 3 with 4, F 4 with 4, F 5 with 4, and F 6 with 5 mps); clava slightly shorter than combined length of F 4 –F 6; scutellar placoid sensilla closer to apex of scutellum and close to each other; fore wing with postmarginal vein about as long as stigmal vein; ovipositor 1.16 × as long as metatibia.Published as part of Triapitsyn, Serguei V., Logarzo, Guillermo A., Aguirre, María B. & Aquino, Daniel A., 2014, Two new species of Anagyrus (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) from Argentina, parasitoids of Hypogeococcus spp. (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), with taxonomic notes on some congeneric taxa, pp. 201-230 in Zootaxa 3861 (3) on page 219, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3861.3.1, http://zenodo.org/record/25060
De Cordoue à Jérusalem: sur une source possible de Zaïre
The main purpose of this article is to reevaluate the role of Shakespearian dramaturgy in Voltaire’s Zaïre, proposing other possible sources. Verdadera Historia del Rey don Rodrigo (1592), containing the story of Muslim princess Zahra, a text that Voltaire read in a French translation by Leroux, and its importance for Voltaire’s play, will so be analysed
Skin Thermal Modeling for Exposure Assessment above 6 GHz: Models Comparison
This study deals with the analysis of different bio-heat thermal models for the evaluation of the exposure assessment at frequencies above 6 GHz, with a focus on the establishment of new safety standards for the 5th generation (5G) of electronic devices. A review of recent analytical and numerical skin thermal models has been conducted and the influence of different simplifying assumptions on the models results has been studied. From the obtained results, some ranges of validity (in terms of frequency and other exposure parameters) of the different hypothesis have been established
Ganomymar dessarti De Santis 1972
Ganomymar dessarti De Santis, 1972 (Figs 147–149) Ganomymar dessarti De Santis, 1972: 2; holotype ♀ (RBINS). TL: Madagascar, locality not specified. Triapitsyn, 2021c: 129 (key), 137 (description). Comments. The holotype fore wing and antenna are illustrated as well as a card-mounted specimen (Fig. 147) collected from Madagascar, “Tamatave, Perinet” [actually, Périnet in Alaotra-Mangoro Region], 23.iv–3.v.1983, J.S. Noyes, M.C. Day (1 ♀, NHMUK). This specimen appears to be conspecific with the holotype. Distribution. Madagascar.Published as part of Huber, John T., Read, Jennifer D. & Triapitsyn, Serguei V., 2021, Illustrated key to the genera and catalogue of Mymaridae (Hymenoptera) in the Afrotropical region, pp. 1-166 in Zootaxa 5036 (1) on pages 29-30, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5036.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/550295
Anagyrus brevistigma De Santis 1964
<i>Anagyrus brevistigma</i> De Santis, 1964 <p>(Figs 13, 14)</p> <p> <b>Type material examined.</b> Holotype female [MLPA] on slide (Fig. 13) labeled: 1. “Balcarce (Prov. de Bs As.) Col: Exp. Museo 10/II/1961 N o2677/1 [in pencil, MLPA type number added later]”; 2. “ <i>Anagyrus brevis-tigma</i> Det. De Santis ♀ [in pencil] HOLOTIPO ZA-169 MUSEO DE LA PLATA ”. The holotype is in fair condition, with the head plus one antenna detached from the body and the other antenna (Fig. 14) detached from the head.</p> <p> <b>Distribution.</b> Argentina: Buenos Aires (De Santis 1964, 1967), and Brazil (De Santis 1980; Noyes & Hayat 1994).</p> <p> <b>Host.</b> <i>Antonina graminis</i> (Maskell) (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) (De Santis 1980; Noyes & Hayat 1994).</p> <p> <b>Taxonomic notes.</b> This species was described from a single female (De Santis 1964). The scape of the antenna (Fig. 14) is strongly broadened, dark brown except white subapically; the pedicel is dark basally and white apically; F1 is dark, and F2–F6 and the clava are pale brownish.</p>Published as part of <i>Triapitsyn, Serguei V., Logarzo, Guillermo A., Aguirre, María B. & Aquino, Daniel A., 2014, Two new species of Anagyrus (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) from Argentina, parasitoids of Hypogeococcus spp. (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), with taxonomic notes on some congeneric taxa, pp. 201-230 in Zootaxa 3861 (3)</i> on pages 209-210, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3861.3.1, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/250604">http://zenodo.org/record/250604</a>
Anagyrus bellator De Santis 1972
Anagyrus bellator (De Santis, 1972) (Figs 3, 4) Xiphomastix bellator De Santis 1972: 46, 47 (illustration). Type locality: Loreto, Misiones, Argentina. Subsequent references: De Santis 1979: 189 (catalog); Loiácono et al. 2001: 158 (type information). Xiphomastix nigriceps De Santis 1972: 46 –47. Type locality: Loreto, Misiones, Argentina. Subsequent references: De Santis 1979: 189 (catalog); Loiácono et al. 2001: 158 (type information). Syn. n. Anagyrus bellator (De Santis): Noyes 1979: 146; Noyes 1980: 173 (list); Noyes 2000: 45 –46 (mentioned). Anagyrus nigriceps (De Santis): Noyes 1979: 148; Noyes 1980: 173 (list, comments); Kerrich 1982: 400 (comments); Noyes 2000: 29 (revived combination). Paranusia bellator (De Santis): Kerrich 1982: 400 –401. Apoanagyrus nigriceps (De Santis): Noyes & Hayat 1994: 305. Type material examined. Holotype female of Xiphomastix bellator De Santis [MLPA] on slide (Fig. 3) labeled: 1. “Loreto (Prov. de Misiones) Col. Ogloblin 12 -IV- 1934 ”; 2. “ Xiphomastix bellator Det. De Santis HOLOTIPO 2691 / 1 [in pencil, MLPA type number added later] ♀ [in pencil] MUSEO DE LA PLATA ”. The holotype is in good condition, mounted dorsoventrally, with the head plus antennae detached from the body. Holotype female of Xiphomastix nigriceps De Santis [MLPA] on slide labeled: 1. “Loreto (Prov. de Misiones) Col. Ogloblin 22 -IV- 1931 ”; 2. “ Xiphomastix nigriceps Det. De Santis HOLOTIPO 2692 / 1 [in pencil, MLPA type number added later] ♀ [in pencil] MUSEO DE LA PLATA ”. The holotype is in good condition, mounted dorsoventrally, with the head and antennae detached from the body. Distribution. Argentina: Misiones (De Santis 1972). Hosts. Unknown. Taxonomic notes. Both names were based on single females (De Santis 1972) collected by A.A. Ogloblin in the same locality during the same month. In the original description of Xiphomastix nigriceps, De Santis (1972) failed to specify any concrete differences between it and X. bellator. The only differences between the two holotypes are in fact quite minor and likely within intraspecific variability. The holotype of A. bellator has the base of F 3 whitish whereas the holotype of A. nigriceps has F 3 entirely dark. Coloration of F 3 of the female antenna varies in some other species of Anagyrus such as A. lopezi (De Santis) (De Santis 1964) and A. quilmes described below. The ovipositors in both holotypes are very long (as in Fig. 4), extended to the base of the gaster anteriorly and markedly exserted beyond the gastral apex (by about 0.25 × of total ovipositor length). Apparent differences in head coloration and sculpture of the frontovertex in the holotypes of A. bellator and A. nigriceps, as noted by Kerrich (1982), are likely due to differences in clearing and other artificial factors in the process of slide-mounting. This was done by A.A. Ogloblin, so almost certainly L. De Santis had never seen their natural colors. It is also likely that head color can be variable in this species. Anagyrus bellator appears to be very close to, and possibly synonymous with, the southern Nearctic and Neotropical species A. pulchricornis (Howard), which is quite variable in coloration of the head, mesosoma, and funicle segments of the female antenna (Noyes 2000). Because we do not have any material of A. pulchricornis for a thorough comparison, we leave the question of their likely conspecificity open for further investigation. In this regard, coloration of the scape of the female antenna may or may not be of diagnostic value: in A. pulchricornis, the scape is “blackish with a small, white, external spot basally and a white subapical band in distal one-third” (Noyes 2000, p. 45; also see his fig. 46, p. 266), whereas in the holotypes of A. bellator and A. nigriceps the scape is darkened as a short band only in the middle (De Santis 1972, his fig. 14, p. 47 and fig. 9, p. 46, respectively).Published as part of Triapitsyn, Serguei V., Logarzo, Guillermo A., Aguirre, María B. & Aquino, Daniel A., 2014, Two new species of Anagyrus (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) from Argentina, parasitoids of Hypogeococcus spp. (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), with taxonomic notes on some congeneric taxa, pp. 201-230 in Zootaxa 3861 (3) on pages 204-206, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3861.3.1, http://zenodo.org/record/25060
Anagyrus montivagus De Santis 1964
Anagyrus montivagus (De Santis, 1964) (Figs 30–33) Leptomastix montivagus De Santis 1964: 86 –88. Type locality: Potrillo Oscuro [as Potrillo Obscuro], La Pampa, Argentina. Subsequent references: De Santis 1967: 152 (catalog); Loiácono et al. 2001: 154 (type information). Apoanagyrus montivagus (De Santis): Noyes 1980: 176 (brief discussion); Kerrich 1982: 413 (discussion), 415 (key); Noyes & Hayat 1994: 305 (revived combination). Epidinocarsis montivagus (De Santis): Noyes & Hayat 1984: 273. Epidinocarsis diversicornis (Howard): De Santis 1989: 31 –32 (misidentification of specimens from Argentina). Anagyrus montivagus (De Santis): Noyes 2000: 29, 71 (mentioned). Type material examined. Holotype female [MLPA] on slide (Fig. 30) labeled: 1. “POTRILLO OBSCURO (Prov. de La Pampa) col: Exp. Museo 27 /I/ 1958 ♀ [in pencil]”; 2. “ Leptomastix montivagus Det. De Santis HOLOTIPO 1936 / 1 [MLPA type number added later] MUSEO DE LA PLATA ”. The holotype is in fair condition, with head plus one antenna (Fig. 31) detached from the body (Fig. 32), and the other antenna detached from the head. Distribution. Argentina: Autonomous City of Buenos Aires and La Pampa (De Santis 1964, 1967), and also Misiones (De Santis 1989 [as Epidinocarsis diversicornis (Howard)]. Hosts. Unknown. Taxonomic notes. This species was described from the holotype and two female paratypes (De Santis 1964). In the holotype, the scape is mostly dark except light apically; F 1 is distinctly longer than F 2; F 2 is whitish and contrasts with the other dark brown funicular segments (Fig. 31). Both Noyes (1980, 2000) and Kerrich (1982) considered the possibility that A. montivagus might be a mere color form of, and thus likely synonymous with, A. diversicornis. Although this is possible, we are unable to assess intraspecific variation within A. diversicornis properly. Therefore, for practical reasons, we prefer to keep A. montivagus as a valid taxon, separating the two putative species based on the proportions of the fore wing, as follows. In the holotype of A. montivagus, the fore wing (Fig. 33) is about 3.0× as long as wide, whereas in A. diversicornis it is about 2.5 × as long as wide (Noyes 2000). De Santis (1989: 31–32) reported A. diversicornis from Loreto, Misiones, Argentina. We examined 3 females [MLPA] determined by him (collected 3.i. 1931 and 20.vi. 1933 by A.A. Ogloblin) and conclude that they rather belong to A. montivagus because their fore wings are 2.9–3.28 × as long as wide and leg coloration is about the same as for the holotype of this species. Anagyrus porteri (Brèthes, 1921) (extralimital, included in the key) (Figs 34–36) Gyranusia Porteri [sic] Brèthes 1921: 138 –139. Type locality: Lampa, Santiago Metropolitan Region, Chile. Gyranusia porteri Brèthes: De Santis 1950: 54 (holotype information, synonymy of Gyranusia Brèthes under Paranusia Brèthes). Paranusia porteri (Brèthes): De Santis 1979: 11, 243. Anagyrus porteri (Brèthes): Noyes 1980: 173. Type material examined. Holotype female (Fig. 34) [MACN] on card labeled: 1. “Prof Porter. s/sauce cu-bierto de pul-gones.—Lampa, 17 de Mayo, 1920 ”; 2. “Lampa 17.v. 920 C. E. Porter”; 3. “ Gyranusia porteri Brèthes ”; 4. “ type!” except for one antenna (Fig. 35) [MACN] on slide labeled: 1. “Museo arg. C. Naturales sección ENTOMOLOGIA CHILE Lampa, 17 -V- 920 C. E. Porter leg. No. 1336 – 33 [in pencil]”; 2. “ Gyranusia porteri Brèthes HOLOTYPUS [red] CHILE [faint]”. Distribution. Chile (Brèthes 1921). Hosts. Unknown; according to the label, it was collected from a willow covered by aphids. Taxonomic notes. This species was described from a single female. The flagellum has F 6 and the clava white (Figs 34, 35), and the fore wing (Fig. 36) has three dark, transverse bands on the disc. The basal band behind the submarginal vein is very wide, the middle band behind the marginal and stigmal veins is narrow, and the apical band at wing’s apex is broader than the middle but narrower than the basal band.Published as part of Triapitsyn, Serguei V., Logarzo, Guillermo A., Aguirre, María B. & Aquino, Daniel A., 2014, Two new species of Anagyrus (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) from Argentina, parasitoids of Hypogeococcus spp. (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), with taxonomic notes on some congeneric taxa, pp. 201-230 in Zootaxa 3861 (3) on pages 219-221, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3861.3.1, http://zenodo.org/record/25060
- …
