1,720,953 research outputs found

    Playing Truth and Metaphorical Reference: The Issue of the Literary Work in the Perspectives of Hans-Georg Gadamer and Paul Ricoeur

    Get PDF
    W artykule zostają porównane pojęcia gry i prawdy w koncepcji Hansa-Georga Gadamera oraz pojęcia referencji i metafory u Paula Ricoeura. Najpierw autor skupia się na Gadamerze, który przedstawia istnienie dzieła sztuki jako grę. Następnie analizuje, w jaki sposób dzieła literackie mogą służyć za nośniki prawdy i czym ta prawda w kontekście dzieła literackiego jest. Po zakończeniu opisu koncepcji Gadamera autor przechodzi do analizy wybranych wątków z teorii hermeneutycznej Ricoeura. Punktem wyjścia jest zagadnienie różnych rodzajów referencji w tekstach. W powiązaniu z referencją poetycką autor opisuje charakterystyczną cechę tekstów poetyckich – metaforę. Kończąca artykuł część porównawcza ma na celu ukazanie relacji między tymi pojęciami w kontekście hermeneutyki obu filozofów.The article compares the concepts of play and truth in the philosophy of Hans-Georg Gadamer with the concepts of reference and metaphor in the philosophy of Paul Ricoeur. The author begins by focusing on Gadamer, who presents the existence of artwork as a game. Then, the author analyzes how literary works can serve as carriers of truth and what this truth means in the context of literature. After describing Gadamer’s concepts, the author moves on to the analysis of selected themes from Ricoeur’s hermeneutical theory. The starting point is the issue of different types of reference in texts. In connection with poetic reference, the author describes the characteristic feature of poetic texts - metaphor. The final comparative section of the article seeks to uncover the connections between these concepts within the framework of both philosophers’ hermeneutics

    Paul Ricoeur’s and Hans-Georg Gadamer’s Theory of Interpretation: A Comparative Analysis

    Get PDF
    The article aims to analyze the hermeneutics of discourse outlined by Paul Ricoeur in his Interpretation Theory, and to compare the themes  related to it with the issues raised by Hans-Georg Gadamer’s philosophy. In his work, Ricoeur presents interpretation as a dialectical process going from naive understanding to explanation, and then from explanation to a deeper understanding. At each of these three stages, some problems arise with which Gadamer had struggled several years earlier in his Truth and Method. However, it is Ricoeur’s concept that will be the starting point for the author  as it displays the issue of interpretation in a systematic and orderly manner, while analogous themes  regarding interpretation which can be found in Gadamer, are distributed among many of his works and are often intertwined with issues not directly related to the phenomenon of understanding itself.The article aims to analyze the hermeneutics of discourse outlined by Paul Ricoeur in his Interpretation Theory, and to compare the themes  related to it with the issues raised by Hans-Georg Gadamer’s philosophy. In his work, Ricoeur presents interpretation as a dialectical process going from naive understanding to explanation, and then from explanation to a deeper understanding. At each of these three stages, some problems arise with which Gadamer had struggled several years earlier in his Truth and Method. However, it is Ricoeur’s concept that will be the starting point for the author  as it displays the issue of interpretation in a systematic and orderly manner, while analogous themes  regarding interpretation which can be found in Gadamer, are distributed among many of his works and are often intertwined with issues not directly related to the phenomenon of understanding itself.The article aims to analyze the hermeneutics of discourse outlined by Paul Ricoeur in his Interpretation Theory, and to compare the themes  related to it with the issues raised by Hans-Georg Gadamer’s philosophy. In his work, Ricoeur presents interpretation as a dialectical process going from naive understanding to explanation, and then from explanation to a deeper understanding. At each of these three stages, some problems arise with which Gadamer had struggled several years earlier in his Truth and Method. However, it is Ricoeur’s concept that will be the starting point for the author  as it displays the issue of interpretation in a systematic and orderly manner, while analogous themes  regarding interpretation which can be found in Gadamer, are distributed among many of his works and are often intertwined with issues not directly related to the phenomenon of understanding itself.The article aims to analyze the hermeneutics of discourse outlined by Paul Ricoeur in his Interpretation Theory, and to compare the themes  related to it with the issues raised by Hans-Georg Gadamer’s philosophy. In his work, Ricoeur presents interpretation as a dialectical process going from naive understanding to explanation, and then from explanation to a deeper understanding. At each of these three stages, some problems arise with which Gadamer had struggled several years earlier in his Truth and Method. However, it is Ricoeur’s concept that will be the starting point for the author  as it displays the issue of interpretation in a systematic and orderly manner, while analogous themes  regarding interpretation which can be found in Gadamer, are distributed among many of his works and are often intertwined with issues not directly related to the phenomenon of understanding itself.Celem artykułu jest dokonanie analizy hermeneutyki dyskursu, zarysowanej przez Paula Ricoeura w Teorii interpretacji, oraz zestawienie związanych z nią wątków z zagadnieniami, które w swojej filozofii poruszał Hans-Georg Gadamer. Ricoeur w swoim dziele ukazuje interpretację jako dialektyczny proces przebiegający od naiwnego rozumienia do wyjaśniania, a następnie od wyjaśniania do rozumienia pogłębionego. Na każdym z tych trzech etapów pojawiają się problemy, z którymi Gadamer zmagał się kilkanaście lat wcześniej w Prawdzie i metodzie. To jednak koncepcja Ricoeura będzie dla mnie punktem wyjścia, gdyż zagadnienie interpretacji jest w niej przedstawione w systematyczny i uporządkowany sposób, natomiast analogiczne wątki dotyczące interpretacji, które możemy odnaleźć u Gadamera, są rozmieszczone w wielu pracach oraz często przeplatają się z zagadnieniami niedotyczącymi wprost samego fenomenu rozumienia.The article aims to analyze the hermeneutics of discourse outlined by Paul Ricoeur in his Interpretation Theory, and to compare the themes  related to it with the issues raised by Hans-Georg Gadamer’s philosophy. In his work, Ricoeur presents interpretation as a dialectical process going from naive understanding to explanation, and then from explanation to a deeper understanding. At each of these three stages, some problems arise with which Gadamer had struggled several years earlier in his Truth and Method. However, it is Ricoeur’s concept that will be the starting point for the author  as it displays the issue of interpretation in a systematic and orderly manner, while analogous themes  regarding interpretation which can be found in Gadamer, are distributed among many of his works and are often intertwined with issues not directly related to the phenomenon of understanding itself

    Ukazywanie świata i zawiązywanie dialogu: kwestia języka u Hansa-Georga Gadamera i Paula Ricoeura

    Get PDF
    Artykuł ma na celu ukazanie podobieństw i różnic między poglądami Hansa-Georga Gadamera i Paula Ricoeura w kwestii języka. Pierwszą płaszczyzną, na której obaj filozofowie zostają porównani, jest ich filozoficzny punkt wyjścia – u Gadamera jest nim próba przezwyciężenia instrumentalnej wizji języka, natomiast u Ricoeura dochodzi do próby przezwyciężenia pewnych ograniczeń strukturalizmu. Druga płaszczyzna analizowanego zagadnienia dotyczy kwestii stosunku języka do świata (Gadamer), określanego również jako referencja (Ricoeur). Na koniec zestawione ze sobą zostają poglądy obu filozofów na dialogiczność języka, tj. na fakt, że intencją niektórych z wypowiedzi jest bycie zrozumianym przez inną osobę.

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Get PDF
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Get PDF
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Get PDF
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    Author Index

    No full text
    Nao informado

    koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist

    No full text
    We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
    corecore