16,038 research outputs found
James C. Furman to Johnathan Davis
No full textA three page letter and envelope from James C. Furman to Davis
James C. Furman to Noah K. Davis
No full textA two page letter from James C. Furman to Noak K. Davis, president of Bethel College in Russellsville, Kentucky
Frank Davis and PFC Richard Anderson (Italy)
No full textAccording to Shaffer: ''[This is] Frank Davis and Richard Anderson.'
John Davis to James C. Furman
No full textA two page letter and envelope from John Davis to James C. Furma
Oswell Reeder and Zimmerman Davis to James C. Furman
No full textA three page letter from Oswell Reeder and Zimmerman Davis to James C. Furma
Pioneer personal history questionnaire, R. E. Davis
No full textTypescript of answers by Richard Elias Davis for a questionnaire filled out for Utah Works Progress Administration\u27s "Pioneer personal history" survey. He was born in Willard, Utah, in 1859, and lived there most of his life. Typed by C. H. Stacy in 193
Dr. Hooper to Reverend Johnathan Davis.
No full textA two page letter and envelope from Dr.Hooper to Reverend Johnathan Davis
Linda M. Burton to Mary Glenn Davis Furman
No full textA one page letter from Linda M. Burton to Mary Glenn Davis Furman
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
No full textThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
