1,721,261 research outputs found
David Baxter
A photo of David Baxter on a donkey used for transportation. This photo is believed to be taken in Calheta, a small village just 3 km north of Vila do Maio.https://digitalcommons.ric.edu/baxter_gallery/1892/thumbnail.jp
David Baxter in Pico do Fogo
David Baxter photographed inside Pico do Fogo, a volcano on the island of Fogo.https://digitalcommons.ric.edu/baxter_gallery/1502/thumbnail.jp
Fales, David Baxter
Memorial Statement for Professor David Baxter Fales who died in 1974. The memorial statements contained herein were prepared by the Office of the Dean of the University Faculty of Cornell University to honor its faculty for their service to the university
Portrait of David Baxter and Two Fishermen
David Baxter poses with fishermen along the coast of Praia de Cabral ( Cabral Beach ).https://digitalcommons.ric.edu/baxter_gallery/1630/thumbnail.jp
David Baxter and Unidentified Woman
David Baxter and an unidentified woman pose for a photo in Vila do Maio. Because of the wall behind them, this photo may have been taken at an 18th century fort that is located on the edge of the village. This photo has been cropped from it\u27s original version.https://digitalcommons.ric.edu/baxter_gallery/1860/thumbnail.jp
David Baxter at Chapel Ruins
A photograph of David Baxter with an unidentified man [see Tombs in a 19th Century Cemetery] in front of the ruins of a small chapel. The chapel is located just inland from Praia de Crabal, a beach just a couple miles from Sal Rei.https://digitalcommons.ric.edu/baxter_gallery/1646/thumbnail.jp
Sponsored reports: David Baxter on the interface between research and policy
This non-peer reviewed interview, originally published on The Grey Lit Café podcast, is published as part of the Critical Gambling Studies blog.
CitationSponsored reports: David Baxter on the interface between research and policy. The Grey Lit Café. https://thegreylitcafe.buzzsprout.com/1936705/10829288-sponsored-reports-david-baxter-on-the-interface-between-research-and-policy
DescriptionA significant portion of gambling research funding comes from non-academic sponsors—mainly governments or government-organized bodies — and the output of the sponsored project is usually a research report to the sponsor rather than academic journal articles or books. Research published in this way is of comparable quality to academic publications, but is referred to by librarians and information managers as "grey literature" because its limited distribution can make it difficult to discover and manage.Many academic journal articles on gambling are in fact spin-offs that originated from such sponsored projects. Researchers adapt their work into academic articles to reach new audiences and build the academic body of knowledge, but also because grey literature contributions receive much less recognition in academics\u27 career evaluations.In this episode of The Grey Lit Café, David Baxter has a critical discussion with host Anthony Haynes about the challenges gambling researchers face when doing sponsored research, how the conflicts of interest of sponsored research shape the academic body of knowledge on gambling, and ways that gambling researchers and government sponsors can better support each other\u27s needs as well as the needs of people experiencing gambling harms whom the sponsored research is intended to help
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
