1,720,989 research outputs found

    Breeding Soundness Evaluation in Alpaca (Vicugna pacos) Males: A Long Retrospective Study of the Effects of Cystic Masses and Environmental Temperatures on Scrotal Measures

    Full text link
    Male alpacas have reproductive peculiarities that can influence the breeding soundness evaluation (BSE). This study was aimed to analyse the frequency of epididymal and testicular cystic lesions in alpacas (Vicugna pacos) retrospectively during different environmental temperatures. A total of 45 subject from 120 males were evaluated with linear probe (10 MHz; MyLab VetONE) between at 5 different alpaca farms in Italy. Semen was collected via artificial vagina and semen parameters were evaluated. Twenty % (9/45) of the males demonstrated the presence of abnormal testicular and epididymal cyst. Those cystic lesions could represent a simple result of drainage defect of the fluid produced (ectasia of the rete testis), congenitally derived from a probable hereditary pattern (2/9) or affecting epididymal structures (3/9). Cystic lesions can increase the scrotal volumetric asymmetry due to the most common mono -lateral lesions (P<0.05). Some diagnostic biochemical parameters such as the seminal plasma alkaline phosphatase was higher in affected males (P<0.05). Besides, environmental temperature can influence scrotal swelling independently by the presence of cystic lesions thus alter the scrotal volume. The ultrasonography can provide more specific information about the presence of epididymal and testicular anomalies influencing the BSE results

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore