1,720,960 research outputs found
Криминологическая типология преступников-радикалов среди осужденных к лишению свободы
No full textДанильченко, П. Ю. Кримінологічна типологія злочинців-радикалів серед засуджених до позбавлення волі / Павло Юрійович Данильченко // Право і безпека. – 2023. – № 1(88). – С. 146-156. - DOI:https://doi.org/10.32631/pb.2023.1.13.Данильченко П. Ю. Кримінологічна типологія злочинців-радикалів серед засуджених до позбавлення волі. Право і безпека. 2023. № 1 (88). С. 146–156.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.32631/pb.2023.1.13.Danylchenko, P. Yu. (2023). Criminological typology of radical criminals among
sentenced to imprisonment. Law and Safety, 1(88), 146–156. https://doi.org/10.32631/pb.2023.1.13.Досліджено особу злочинців-радикалів серед засуджених до позбавлення волі з використанням методу типології. Запропоновано сім авторських типологічних критеріїв: за характером, спрямованістю кримінально-радикальних дій, контекстуальним елементом особистісної радикалізації, джерелом радикальної установки,
особливостями предикатного стану радикала, екзистенційним змістом кримінальнорадикальної поведінки, домінуючою соціально-рольовою ознакою. На їх підставі виділено й охарактеризовано 22 кримінологічні типи (враховуючи підтипи) кримінальних
радикалів серед засуджених. Визначено можливості використання цієї інформації у сфері роботи службових осіб секторів карантину, діагностики та розподілу виправних колоній, інспекторів відділів соціально-психологічної роботи, оперативних працівників.The article is devoted to the study of radical criminals among those sentenced to imprisonment. The purpose of the article is to provide a criminological typological characteristic of
criminal radicals among those sentenced to imprisonment. The following tasks have been
solved to achieve this goal: 1) to define the typological criteria for the division of criminal radicals among those sentenced to imprisonment; 2) to identify the relevant criminological types
according to the criteria; 3) to identify and describe the signs of criminological types of criminal radicals among those sentenced to imprisonment.
It has been proposed that 7 typological personal criteria should be used in scientific use and
practical criminal prevention activities: by nature, by the direction of criminal and radical actions, by the contextual element of personal radicalisation, by the source of radical attitude, by
the peculiarities of the radical’s predicate state, by the existential content of criminal and radical behaviour, and by the dominant social and role feature. According to them,
22 criminological types (including subtypes) of criminal radicals among convicts were identified. The author describes the key criminologically significant features of each type. The integrated typological characteristics of radical criminals among convicts give grounds to note that
most of them can be correlated with an initiative, aggressive, rational-conformist, collectivist
radical of an inclusive type.
Both the initial diagnostic work of the relevant units and officials of the quarantine, diagnostic
and distribution sectors of correctional colonies, as well as the further work of social and psychological work inspectors, should be aimed at identifying and recording these features. It has
been argued that this information should also be taken into account when organising and carrying out operational work among prisoners in order to block the development of motivations
for radical actions in a timely manner and to stop the tendencies of radicalisation among prisoners.
It has been noted that the proposed typology of criminal radicals in penitentiary institutions is
not closed, exhaustive, and can be supplemented with other criteria and types depending on
the researcher's target setting and a specific applied request in the field of prevention of criminal radical manifestations in penitentiary institutions.Исследована личность преступников-радикалов среди осужденных к лишению свободы с использованием метода типологии. Предложено семь авторских типологических критериев: по характеру, направленности криминально-радикальных действий, контекстуальному элементу личностной радикализации, источнику радикальной установки, особенностям предикатного состояния радикала, экзистенциальному содержанию криминально-радикального поведения, доминирующему социальноролевому признаку. На их основании выделены и охарактеризованы 22 криминологических типа (включая подтипы) криминальных радикалов среди осужденных. Определены возможности использования этой информации в работе служебных лиц секторов
карантина, диагностики и распределения исправительных колоний, инспекторов отделов социально-психологической работы, оперативных работников
Криминологический анализ состояния криминального радикализма среди осужденных в учреждениях исполнения наказаний
No full textДанильченко, П. Ю. Кримінологічний аналіз стану кримінального радикалізму серед засуджених в установах виконання покарань / Павло Юрійович
Данильченко // Право і безпека. – 2022. – № 4 (87). – С. 145-158. - DOI: https://doi.org/10.32631/pb.2022.4.12.Данильченко П. Ю. Кримінологічний аналіз стану кримінального радикалізму серед засуджених в установах виконання покарань. Право і безпека. 2022. No 4 (87). С. 145–158. DOI :https:/ /doi.org/10.32631/pb.202 2.4.12.Danylchenko, P. Yu. (2022). Criminological analysis of criminal radicalism state among convicts in penal institutions. Law and Safety, 4(87), 145–158. https:/ /doi.org/10.32631/pb.2022.4.12.Досліджено стан кримінального радикалізму серед засуджених в установах виконання покарань. З’ясовано, що кримінальний радикалізм – це заборонені законом про кримінальну відповідальність прояви радикального, насильницького впливу на складові середовища відбування покарань із метою їх докорінної зміни. Кримінальний радикалізм серед засуджених представлений блочною структурою, яка передбачає неоднаковий кримінально-правовий зміст і межі відповідних асоціальних практик. Виділено й охарактеризовано ендогенний та екзогенний кримінальний радикалізм в установах виконання покарань. Сукупні усереднені щорічні показники екзогенного та ендогенного кримінального радикалізму фіксуються на рівні 142 кримінальних правопорушення, частка у структурі злочинності серед ув’язнених – 10 %, наявна тенденція до позитивного приросту.The article is devoted to the study of the criminal radicalism state among prisoners in penal institutions. The purpose of the article is to formulate a theoretical model of the criminal radicalism state among prisoners in penal institutions.It has been found that criminal radicalism is a manifestation of radical, violent influence on the components of the punishment environment, prohibited by the law on criminal liability, with the aim of fundamentally changing them.Criminal radicalism am ong convicts is represented by a block structure, which provides for unequal criminal law content and limits of relevant anti-social practices. Endogenous and exogenous criminal radicalism in penal institutions has been identified and characterized.The annual level of endogenous criminal radicalism among convicts in penal institutions is 32 crimes, 87.5% of which are criminal offenses provided for in Art. 255- 1 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, 9.4% are intentional murders, 3.1% are intentional grievous bodily harm.In the structure of general crime among prisoners (annual averaged indicator), the share of endogenous criminal radicalism is about 6 %.In 2021, the level of exogenous criminal radicalism amounted to 143 criminal offenses, which is 27.7% of the total crime in penitentiary institutions.The average annual value of the relevant indicators in 2016–2021 was 134 criminal offenses, and the average share in the structure of crime in penal institutions was 29.5%.The aggregate indicators of exogenousand endoge-nous criminal radicalism, i.e. criminal radicalism among prisoners in general, show the follow-ing picture: the average annual level is 142 criminal offenses, the share in the structure of crime among prisoners is 29%, but without taking into ac count the latency factor.Taking into account the latent part of crime in penitentiary institutions, especially drug-related crimes, violent sex crimes, criminal offenses against health and property, the real share of criminal radicalism among prisoners isabout 10%. There is a tendency for positive growth.Исследовано состояние криминального радикализма среди осужденных в учреждениях исполнения наказаний. Установлено, что криминальный радикализм – это запрещенные законом об уголовной ответственности проявления радикального, насильственного влияния на составляющие среды отбывания наказаний с целью их коренного изменения. Криминальный радикализм среди осужденных представлен блоковой структурой, предусматривающей неодинаковое уголовно-правовое содержание и границы соответствующих асоциальных практик. Выделены и охарактеризованы эндогенный и экзогенный криминальный радикализм в учреждениях исполнения наказаний. Совокупные усредненные ежегодные показатели экзогенного и эндогенного криминального радикализма фиксируются на уровне 142 уголовных правонарушения, доля в структуре преступности среди заключенных – 10 %, налицо тенденция к положительному приросту
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Get PDF“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Get PDFWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Get PDFWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
