1,720,986 research outputs found
T lymphocytic subpopulations of normal human peripheral blood defined by monoclonal antobodies. An immunochemical ultrastructural study using immunogold staining method
No full textStudio immunocitochimico ultrastrutturale su timociti umani normali a diversi stadi differenziativi
No full textAn Immunocytochemical ultrastructural study on normal human thymocytes at discrete stages of differentation
No full textHuman Thymocyte differentiation: an ultrastructural study using monoclonal antibodies and immunogold staining method
No full textImmunoelectron microscopy with immunogold staining method and monoclonal antibodies. A promising tool in ultrastructural study of lymphatic subpopulations
No full text
Microscopic vs immunologic classification of lymphoid leukemias (LL) and non Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL)
No full textGoing Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
