1,721,023 research outputs found

    Fig. 1 in L'importance des échantillons corses dans les herbiers genevois

    No full text
    Fig. 1. – Briquet, Burnat et Cavillier lors de leur première expédition commune en Corse [Bibliothèque des Conservatoire et Jardin botanique de la Ville de Genève].Published as part of Daniel Jeanmonod, 2017, L'importance des échantillons corses dans les herbiers genevois, pp. 133-142 in Candollea 72 (1) on page 135, DOI: 10.15553/c2017v721a9, http://zenodo.org/record/88899

    Fig. 4 in L'importance des échantillons corses dans les herbiers genevois

    No full text
    Fig. 4. – Carte de la Corse montrant les secteurs géographiques de l'île et le nombre d'échantillons d'herbier par secteur selon la base de données.Published as part of Daniel Jeanmonod, 2017, L'importance des échantillons corses dans les herbiers genevois, pp. 133-142 in Candollea 72 (1) on page 140, DOI: 10.15553/c2017v721a9, http://zenodo.org/record/88899

    Fig. 5. – Nombre d in L'importance des échantillons corses dans les herbiers genevois

    No full text
    Fig. 5. – Nombre d'échantillons d'herbier selon l'altitude, par tranche de 100 m, selon la base de données. La première tranche (9 070 échantillons) a été tronquée à 3 000 pour permettre une meilleure visibilité des autres tranches.Published as part of <i>Daniel Jeanmonod, 2017, L'importance des échantillons corses dans les herbiers genevois, pp. 133-142 in Candollea 72 (1)</i> on page 141, DOI: 10.15553/c2017v721a9, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/888997">http://zenodo.org/record/888997</a&gt

    Fig. 3 in Lectotypification of three species of Silene sect. Italicae (Rohrb.) Schischk. (Caryophyllaceae)

    Full text link
    Fig. 3. – Lectotype of Silene splendens Boiss. (designated by an arrow). [Balansa 1312, G-BOIS]Published as part of Pierre-Emmanuel Du Pasquier & Daniel Jeanmonod, 2016, Lectotypification of three species of Silene sect. Italicae (Rohrb.) Schischk. (Caryophyllaceae), pp. 19-22 in Candollea 71 (1) on page 22, DOI: 10.15553/c2016v711a4, http://zenodo.org/record/16204

    Fig. 1 in Lectotypification of three species of Silene sect. Italicae (Rohrb.) Schischk. (Caryophyllaceae)

    No full text
    Fig. 1. – Lectotype of Silene astartes C.I. Blanche ex Boiss. The morphological description is written by C.I. Blanche at the bottom right of the herbarium sheet. [Blanche 55, G-BOIS]Published as part of Pierre-Emmanuel Du Pasquier & Daniel Jeanmonod, 2016, Lectotypification of three species of Silene sect. Italicae (Rohrb.) Schischk. (Caryophyllaceae), pp. 19-22 in Candollea 71 (1) on page 20, DOI: 10.15553/c2016v711a4, http://zenodo.org/record/16204

    Silene astartes C.I. Blanche ex Boiss., Fl. Orient. Suppl.

    No full text
    Silene astartes C.I. Blanche ex Boiss., Fl. Orient. Suppl.: 102. 1888. Lectotypus (designated here): Lebanon . Prov. Mount-Lebanon: Djebaïl, ruines d’AFka, VI-VII.1880, fl. & Fr., Blanche 55 (G-BOIS [G00330604]!; isolecto-: BEI!, G [G00341654]!) (Fig. 1). Notes. – Boissier (1888) published S. astartes in the “Supplementum oF the Flora Orientalis”. He wrote “ S. astartes (Blanche in litt.)” beFore the Latin description. Ŋe mention oF Blanche as the author “in litt.” by Boissier has been interpreted in different ways in the literature. Floras oF Lebanon have cited only C.I. Blanche as the author oF the species (sometimes with the mention “in Boiss.”; Post, 1896, 1932; ThiÉbaut, 1936; Mouterde, 1966; TohmÉ & TohmÉ, 2007), whereas BouloumoY (1930) interpreted the authorship as “Boiss. et B.” [Boiss. & C.I. Blanche]. In the Boissier’s Herbarium oF the “Flora Orientalis” (G-BOIS), Blanche 55 contains a handwritten note by Blanche himselF with a Latin description oF the species (Fig. 1). However this description differs considerably From the protologue where Boissier published a new and more complete description by validating the name (Boissier, 1888: 102). We thereFore ascribe Boissier as the author oF S. astartes in accordance with Greuter et al. (1984) and not as C.I. Blanche as mentioned in the latest flora oF Lebanon treatment (TohmÉ & TohmÉ, 2007). Boissier (1888) clearly cited two gatherings in the protologue: “Hab. in Libano supra Djebail ad minas AFka (Bl.!)” and “ad Ain SuFar (Peyron!)”. Only Blanche 55 [G00330604] is present in G-BOIS. We Found three duplicates oF the Peyron collection at G and one at P. Each oF them bears the locality “Ain SuFar” and are dated June 11, 1882. Two oF them have the collection number 1379 mentioned [G00341656, P04987226]) and two [G00341655, G00341657] without any number. All these collections have a glandular-pubescent calyx and match Fully with S. italica (L.) Pers. and not with S. astartes, which has a calyx always glabrous. ŊereFore, we choose Blanche 55 housed at G-BOIS as the lectotype, which is the only material present at G-BOIS and exclude the remaining syntypes From S. astartes.Published as part of Pierre-Emmanuel Du Pasquier & Daniel Jeanmonod, 2016, Lectotypification of three species of Silene sect. Italicae (Rohrb.) Schischk. (Caryophyllaceae), pp. 19-22 in Candollea 71 (1) on page 21, DOI: 10.15553/c2016v711a4, http://zenodo.org/record/16204

    Silene galataea Boiss., Fl. Orient. Suppl.

    No full text
    Silene galataea Boiss., Fl. Orient. Suppl.: 102. 1888. Lectotypus (designated here): Cyprus . Prov. Troödos: circa Galata, 15.VI.1880, Fl. & Fr., Sintenis U Rigo 768 (G-BOIS [G00330606]!; isolecto-: G-BOIS [G00330606]!, K [K000728598, K000728599] images seen, LD [LD1403097, LD1403157] images seen, P [P05019189, P05396106]!) (Fig. 2). Notes. – A single gathering was designated For S. galataea (Sintenis U Rigo 768) by Boissier (1888). Two sheets oF this collection are housed in G-BOIS, on which two and one specimens are mounted respectively, all clearly labelled. Ŋese specimens apparently correspond to distinct individuals, although it is not clearly obvious on the first sheet. We know that Boissier’s material is not always homogenous and corresponds sometimes to diFFerent species (Jeanmonod, 1985), especially in Silene L. with numerous convergences and potentially cryptic species. For this reason we preFer to fix the morphology oF this species by designating a single plant as lectotype. We thereFore designate the single specimen in G-BOIS mounted on the second sheet as lectotype because it is the most complete specimen and the determination bears Boissier’s handwriting (Fig. 2). Ŋe two other specimens in G-BOIS are thereFore considered as isolectotypes as the remaining duplicates distributed in various herbaria.Published as part of Pierre-Emmanuel Du Pasquier & Daniel Jeanmonod, 2016, Lectotypification of three species of Silene sect. Italicae (Rohrb.) Schischk. (Caryophyllaceae), pp. 19-22 in Candollea 71 (1) on page 21, DOI: 10.15553/c2016v711a4, http://zenodo.org/record/16204

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
    corecore