1,720,986 research outputs found
Solar wind observations from BepiColombo MPO-MAG during Dec 2021
No full text
This dataset contains unreleased data from the BepiColombo mission for the periods 2021-12-06 to 2021-12-07 and 2021-12-24 to 2021-12-26 during the cruise phase to Mercury. In particular, it contains magnetic field observations from the MPO-MAG instrument (Heyner et al. 2021).
****************IMPORTANT NOTE****************
These data have not been released yet to the Planetary Science Archive (PSA). As consequence, they may still suffer some changes due to future calibrations before they are released to the PSA.
Therefore, we strongly encourage all the users to contact the following people before using this dataset.
- Dr Beatriz Sánchez-Cano, University of Leicester, BepiColombo Guest Investigator, [email protected]
- Dr Daniel Heyner, TU Braunschweig, Principal Investigator of MPO-MAG, [email protected]
*********************************************************
File description:
It contains derived data from the outbound sensor. These files have 5 columns with the following information:
1 -Data time
2 - Total magnetic field
3 - B_r component of the Magnetic Field
4 - B_t component of the Magnetic Field
5 - B_n component of the Magnetic Field
Reference:
D. Heyner et al.,(2021), The BepiColombo Planetary Magnetometer MPO-MAG: What can we Learn From the Hermean Magnetic Field? Space Sci Rev, 217, 52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-021-00822-x
</p
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
Solar wind observations from BepiColombo MPO-MAG and BERM during Nov-Dec 2020
No full textThis dataset contains unreleased data from the BepiColombo mission for the period 2020-11-27 to 2020-12-15 during the cruise phase to Mercury. In particular, it contains magnetic field observations from the MPO-MAG instrument (Heyner et al. 2021), and energetic particles from the BERM instrument (Pinto et al. 2022).****************IMPORTANT NOTE****************These data have not been released yet to the Planetary Science Archive (PSA). As consequence, they may still suffer some changes due to future calibrations before they are released to the PSA. Therefore, we strongly encourage all the users to contact the following people before using this dataset.-Dr Beatriz Sánchez-Cano, University of Leicester, BepiColombo Guest Investigator, [email protected] Daniel Heyner, TU Braunschweig, Principal Investigator of MPO-MAG, [email protected] Richard Moissl, European Space Agency, Principal Investigator of BERM, [email protected]*********************************************************File descriptions:-MPO-MAG file, named: “MPO-MAG_Nov2020.txt”It contains derived data from the outbound sensor. The file has 7 columns with the following information:1-Time (YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM:SS)2-Total magnetic field in nT.3-Radial component of the magnetic field (Br) in nT and in RTN coordinates.4-Tangential component of the magnetic field (Bt) in nT and in RTN coordinates.5-Normal component of the magnetic field (Bn) in nT and in RTN coordinates.6-Cone angle (theta) of the magnetic field in degrees.7-Clock angle (phi) of the magnetic field in degrees.-BERM file, named: “BERM_Nov2020.txt”It contains uncalibrated “raw” counts. A calibration is currently being performed. The file has 7 columns with the following information:All channel units are "counts".1- Time (DD-MM-YYYY HH:MM:SS)2- All particles3- E1 4- E2 5- E3 6- E47- E5 8- P19- P210- P311- P412- P513- P614- P715- P816- H117- H218- H319- H420- H521- O1References:•D. Heyner et al.,(2021), The BepiColombo Planetary Magnetometer MPO-MAG: What can we Learn From the Hermean Magnetic Field? Space Sci Rev, 217, 52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-021-00822-x •M. Pinto et al., (2022), The BepiColombo Radiation Monitor, Space Sci Rev.</p
Solar wind observations from BepiColombo MPO-MAG and BERM during 9-11 Oct 2021
No full textThis dataset contains unreleased data from the BepiColombo mission for the period 2021-10-09 to 2021-10-11 during the cruise phase to Mercury. In particular, it contains magnetic field observations from the MPO-MAG instrument (Heyner et al. 2021), and energetic particles from the BERM instrument (Pinto et al. 2022).****************IMPORTANT NOTE****************These data have not been released yet to the Planetary Science Archive (PSA). As consequence, they may still suffer some changes due to future calibrations before they are released to the PSA.Therefore, we strongly encourage all the users to contact the following people before using this dataset.- Dr Beatriz Sánchez-Cano, University of Leicester, BepiColombo Guest Investigator, [email protected] Dr Daniel Heyner, TU Braunschweig, Principal Investigator of MPO-MAG, [email protected] Dr Richard Moissl, European Space Agency, Principal Investigator of BERM, [email protected]*********************************************************File descriptions:- MPO-MAG file, named: “Bepi_MAG_RTN_282_284_2021_5min_avg.dat”It contains derived data from the outbound sensor averaged every 5 minutes. The file has 7 columns with the following information:1- Initial time (days of October 2021)2- End time (days of October 2021)3- Radial component of the magnetic field (B_R) in nT and in RTN coordinates.4- Tangential component of the magnetic field (B_T) in nT and in RTN coordinates.5- Normal component of the magnetic field (B_N) in nT and in RTN coordinates.6- Cone angle (theta) of the magnetic field in degrees.7- Clock angle (phi) of the magnetic field in degrees.- BERM file, named: “BERM_OCT_2021.txt”It contains uncalibrated “raw” counts. A calibration is currently being performed. All channel units are "counts". Each column has the following information:1- 6: UT Time (DD MM YYYY HH MM SS)7- All particles8- E19- E210- E311- E412- E513- P114- P215- P316- P417- P518- P619- P720- P821- H122- H223- H324- H425- H526- O1References:• D. Heyner et al.,(2021), The BepiColombo Planetary Magnetometer MPO-MAG: What can we Learn From the Hermean Magnetic Field? Space Sci Rev, 217, 52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-021-00822-x• M. Pinto et al., (2022), The BepiColombo Radiation Monitor, Space Sci Rev.</p
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
