1,721,026 research outputs found
Gerechte-Welt-Glaube und Menschenfeindlichkeit
No full textDalbert C, Zick A, Krause D. Gerechte-Welt-Glaube und Menschenfeindlichkeit. In: Heitmeyer W, ed. Deutsche Zustände, Folge 8. Vol 8. Berlin: Suhrkamp; 2010: 87-106
Personal Belief in a Just World Scale (PBJW)
No full textDer Fragebogen ist zur Anwendung in der Gerechtigkeitsmotivforschung sowie in der Forschung zu Gerechtigkeitsüberzeugungen, zur Bereitschaft zu prosozialen Handlungen, zu Bewältigungsverhalten u. v. m. geeignet. Die GWPER umfasst sieben Items. Reliabilität: Die Test-Retestkorrelationen in einer Stichprobe von Gymnasialschülern (n = 215, 9. bis 12. Klasse) betrug für einen Zeitraum von fünf bis acht Monaten rtt = .58 (p < .001). Die GWPER erwies sich in sieben Studien als homogen. Cronbachs Alpha variierte zwischen Alpha = .82 und Alpha = .91. In einer bezüglich Alter, Geschlecht und Lebenslage heterogenen Gesamtstichprobe von N = 818 Deutschen lag Alpha bei .86. Validität: In drei Untersuchungen an insgesamt 585 Personen konnten mittels Faktorenanalyse über die Items der Allgemeinen und Persönlichen Gerechte-Welt-Skala jeweils zwei Faktoren identifiziert werden, auf denen die Items der beiden Skalen in perfekter Einfachstruktur luden. Die GWPER war diskriminant valide gegenüber dem allgemeinen Glauben an eine gerechte Welt. Die Konstruktvalidität der GWPER wird durch ihre signifikanten Beziehungen zu Wohlbefinden, Selbstwert und eigenem Gerechtigkeitsstreben sowie mit schulspezifischen Gerechtigkeitswahrnehmungen und Gerechtigkeitswahrnehmungen von jugendlichen Straftätern belegt.The questionnaire is designed for use in justice motivational research as well as in research on beliefs in justice, willingness to prosocial action, coping behaviour and much more. The GWPER comprises seven items. Reliability: The test-retest correlation in a sample of high school students (n = 215, 9th to 12th grade) was rtt = .58 (p < .001) for a period of five to eight months. The GWPER proved to be homogeneous in seven studies. Cronbach's alpha varied between alpha = .82 and alpha = .91. In a heterogeneous total sample of N = 818 Germans, which was heterogeneous in terms of age, sex and life situation, alpha was .86. Validity: In three studies involving a total of 585 persons, factor analysis using the items of the General and Personal Just World Scales enabled two factors to be identified on each of which the items of the two scales loaded in a perfect simple structure. The GWPER was discriminately valid against the general belief in a just world. The construct validity of the GWPER is evidenced by its significant relationships to well-being, self-esteem, and personal striving for justice, as well as by school-specific perceptions of justice and perceptions of justice by juvenile offenders.reviewedpublishedVersio
Personal Belief in a Just World Scale (PBJW)
No full textDer Fragebogen ist zur Anwendung in der Gerechtigkeitsmotivforschung sowie in der Forschung zu Gerechtigkeitsüberzeugungen, zur Bereitschaft zu prosozialen Handlungen, zu Bewältigungsverhalten u. v. m. geeignet. Die GWPER umfasst sieben Items. Reliabilität: Die Test-Retestkorrelationen in einer Stichprobe von Gymnasialschülern (n = 215, 9. bis 12. Klasse) betrug für einen Zeitraum von fünf bis acht Monaten rtt = .58 (p < .001). Die GWPER erwies sich in sieben Studien als homogen. Cronbachs Alpha variierte zwischen Alpha = .82 und Alpha = .91. In einer bezüglich Alter, Geschlecht und Lebenslage heterogenen Gesamtstichprobe von N = 818 Deutschen lag Alpha bei .86. Validität: In drei Untersuchungen an insgesamt 585 Personen konnten mittels Faktorenanalyse über die Items der Allgemeinen und Persönlichen Gerechte-Welt-Skala jeweils zwei Faktoren identifiziert werden, auf denen die Items der beiden Skalen in perfekter Einfachstruktur luden. Die GWPER war diskriminant valide gegenüber dem allgemeinen Glauben an eine gerechte Welt. Die Konstruktvalidität der GWPER wird durch ihre signifikanten Beziehungen zu Wohlbefinden, Selbstwert und eigenem Gerechtigkeitsstreben sowie mit schulspezifischen Gerechtigkeitswahrnehmungen und Gerechtigkeitswahrnehmungen von jugendlichen Straftätern belegt.The questionnaire is designed for use in justice motivational research as well as in research on beliefs in justice, willingness to prosocial action, coping behaviour and much more. The GWPER comprises seven items. Reliability: The test-retest correlation in a sample of high school students (n = 215, 9th to 12th grade) was rtt = .58 (p < .001) for a period of five to eight months. The GWPER proved to be homogeneous in seven studies. Cronbach's alpha varied between alpha = .82 and alpha = .91. In a heterogeneous total sample of N = 818 Germans, which was heterogeneous in terms of age, sex and life situation, alpha was .86. Validity: In three studies involving a total of 585 persons, factor analysis using the items of the General and Personal Just World Scales enabled two factors to be identified on each of which the items of the two scales loaded in a perfect simple structure. The GWPER was discriminately valid against the general belief in a just world. The construct validity of the GWPER is evidenced by its significant relationships to well-being, self-esteem, and personal striving for justice, as well as by school-specific perceptions of justice and perceptions of justice by juvenile offenders.reviewedpublishedVersio
Fairness Attitudes in Soccer Scale
No full textDer Fragebogen erfasst über Selbstauskünfte Einstellungen von Fußballspielern zu fairem Verhalten sowie Fairness im Spiel als Aspekte von "Fair Play". Die SFFB basieren auf einer Differenzierung von "Fair Play" in formelle Fairness und informelle Fairness (Lenk, 1964). Sie umfasst 24 Items, die zwei Subskalen zugeordnet werden: (1) "Bereitschaft zu taktischen Regelverstößen (zu formeller Unfairness)" (k = 19) und (2) "Bereitschaft zu informeller Fairness" (k = 5). Reliabilität: Die interne Konsistenz (Cronbachs Alpha) der Skala "Bereitschaft zu taktischen Regelverstößen" betrug Alpha = .94, die der Subskala "Bereitschaft zu informeller Fairness" Alpha = .76. Validität: Für die Validität der Differenzierung zwischen den zwei Subskalen spricht ihre geringe Korrelation von r = -.24. Mit dem Validitätskriterium "Tatsächliche Regelverstöße" (operationalisiert durch einen Index, in dem die Anzahl gelber, gelb-roter und roter Karten eines Spielers in der Vorsaison an der Anzahl seiner Spieleinsätze relativiert wurde) waren die "Bereitschaft zu taktischen Regelverstößen" zu r = .36 und die "Bereitschaft zu informeller Fairness" zu r = -.23 ebenfalls bedeutsam, wenngleich niedrig korreliert.The questionnaire uses self-disclosure to record attitudes of football players to fair behaviour and fairness in the game as aspects of "Fair Play". The SFFB are based on a differentiation of "Fair Play" into formal fairness and informal fairness (Lenk, 1964). It comprises 24 items that are assigned to two subscales: (1) "Willingness to tactical violations of rules (to formal unfairness)" (k = 19) and (2) "Willingness to engage in informal fairness" (k = 5). Reliability: The internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) of the scale "readiness to tactical violations of rules" was alpha = .94, that of the subscale "readiness for informal fairness" was alpha = .94. Alpha = .76. Validity: The validity of the differentiation between the two subscales is indicated by their low correlation of r = -.24. With the validity criterion "Actual rule violations" (operationalized by an index in which the number of yellow, yellow-red and red cards of a player in the previous season was relativized by the number of his bets), the "Willingness to tactical rule violations" to r = .36 and the "Willingness to informal fairness" to r = -.23 were also significant, albeit with a low correlation.reviewedpublishedVersio
Fairness Attitudes in Soccer Scale
No full textDer Fragebogen erfasst über Selbstauskünfte Einstellungen von Fußballspielern zu fairem Verhalten sowie Fairness im Spiel als Aspekte von "Fair Play". Die SFFB basieren auf einer Differenzierung von "Fair Play" in formelle Fairness und informelle Fairness (Lenk, 1964). Sie umfasst 24 Items, die zwei Subskalen zugeordnet werden: (1) "Bereitschaft zu taktischen Regelverstößen (zu formeller Unfairness)" (k = 19) und (2) "Bereitschaft zu informeller Fairness" (k = 5). Reliabilität: Die interne Konsistenz (Cronbachs Alpha) der Skala "Bereitschaft zu taktischen Regelverstößen" betrug Alpha = .94, die der Subskala "Bereitschaft zu informeller Fairness" Alpha = .76. Validität: Für die Validität der Differenzierung zwischen den zwei Subskalen spricht ihre geringe Korrelation von r = -.24. Mit dem Validitätskriterium "Tatsächliche Regelverstöße" (operationalisiert durch einen Index, in dem die Anzahl gelber, gelb-roter und roter Karten eines Spielers in der Vorsaison an der Anzahl seiner Spieleinsätze relativiert wurde) waren die "Bereitschaft zu taktischen Regelverstößen" zu r = .36 und die "Bereitschaft zu informeller Fairness" zu r = -.23 ebenfalls bedeutsam, wenngleich niedrig korreliert.The questionnaire uses self-disclosure to record attitudes of football players to fair behaviour and fairness in the game as aspects of "Fair Play". The SFFB are based on a differentiation of "Fair Play" into formal fairness and informal fairness (Lenk, 1964). It comprises 24 items that are assigned to two subscales: (1) "Willingness to tactical violations of rules (to formal unfairness)" (k = 19) and (2) "Willingness to engage in informal fairness" (k = 5). Reliability: The internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) of the scale "readiness to tactical violations of rules" was alpha = .94, that of the subscale "readiness for informal fairness" was alpha = .94. Alpha = .76. Validity: The validity of the differentiation between the two subscales is indicated by their low correlation of r = -.24. With the validity criterion "Actual rule violations" (operationalized by an index in which the number of yellow, yellow-red and red cards of a player in the previous season was relativized by the number of his bets), the "Willingness to tactical rule violations" to r = .36 and the "Willingness to informal fairness" to r = -.23 were also significant, albeit with a low correlation.reviewedpublishedVersio
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
- …
