857 research outputs found
A cystine-based dual chemosensor for fluorescent-colorimetric detection of CN− and fluorescent detection of Fe3+ in aqueous media: Synthesis, spectroscopic, and DFT studies
A new dual-responsive chiral cystine based chemosensor, Cys(cou)2, has been designed and characterized by 1H NMR, 13C NMR, FT-IR, UV–vis as well as elemental analysis. This sensor exhibited an excellent response towards Fe3+ and CN− with high selectivity and sensitivity by fluorescence turn-off mechanism. The binding mode of Cys(cou)2 with Fe3+, and CN− was confirmed by ESI-MS, 1H NMR, and fluorescence titration and also quantum chemical calculation. These results showed that the stoichiometric ratio of Cys(cou)2-Fe3+ and Cys(cou)2-CN is 1:1 and 1:3 in DMSO/Tris aqueous buffer (1:1, v/v), respectively. The linear relationship of the Stern-Volmer plot illustrates the static quenching mechanism at different concentrations. The detection limit (LOD) and binding constant (Ka) for Fe3+ and CN− are 0.029 μM, 1.28 × 104 and 0.51 μM, 9.94 × 106, respectively. Moreover, Cys(cou)2 can act as a colorimetric sensor for CN− in DMSO with the color change from colorless to yellow
sj-docx-2-han-10.1177_15589447231198268 – Supplemental material for Outcomes Following Surgical Interventions for Isolated Lunotriquetral Interosseous Ligament Injuries: A Systematic Review
Supplemental material, sj-docx-2-han-10.1177_15589447231198268 for Outcomes Following Surgical Interventions for Isolated Lunotriquetral Interosseous Ligament Injuries: A Systematic Review by Mohanad Omar-Hossein, Jacob C. K. Leung, Joyce Munaku, Danielle Rodzik, Armaghan Dabbagh and Mike Szekeres in HAND</p
sj-docx-1-han-10.1177_15589447231198268 – Supplemental material for Outcomes Following Surgical Interventions for Isolated Lunotriquetral Interosseous Ligament Injuries: A Systematic Review
Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-han-10.1177_15589447231198268 for Outcomes Following Surgical Interventions for Isolated Lunotriquetral Interosseous Ligament Injuries: A Systematic Review by Mohanad Omar-Hossein, Jacob C. K. Leung, Joyce Munaku, Danielle Rodzik, Armaghan Dabbagh and Mike Szekeres in HAND</p
The Ethics of Non-Therapeutic Male Circumcision Under Islamic Law
Abstract
This qualitative research is a philosophical review about analyzing how circumcision can (cannot) be morally justified. It is typically assumed among Muslims that circumcision is mandatory according to Islamic law (Sharia). However, in this paper, I will argue that this is not clear in Islamic texts. Because firstly there is no textual evidence in the Quran about this matter and secondly permissibility of circumcision is not an agreed topic among Muslim scholars. This entails that circumcision is not a necessary part of being a Muslim. Although this idea seems idiosyncratic according to the majority of Muslims, I’m inclined to emphasize that we should not marginalize this idea, rather we have to support it for educational prosperity in Muslim communities. But perhaps more importantly this paper helps to introduce new Muslim intellectuals’ argument that moral reasoning is independent from (and even superior to) Islamic law. Since we do not have ultimate and decisive secular reason (e.g., medical reason) against male circumcision in every occasion, therefore, morally speaking, I believe it is not reasonable to say that male circumcision is always wrong. Muslims who support male circumcision still can find some secular reasons to defend this from their cultural identity.
Abstrak
Penelitian kualitatif ini merupakan tinjauan filosofis yang bertujuan menganalisis bagaimana sunat dapat atau tidak dapat dibenarkan secara moral. Ummat Muslim beranggapan bahwa hukum sunat adalah wajib menurut hukum Islam (Syariah). Akan tetapi, dalam tulisan ini, saya akan berargumen bahwa belum ada penjabaran yang pasti perihal asal hukum wajib pada sunat ini dalam Islam. Argumen ini memiliki dua alasan. Alasan pertama adalah tidak ada bukti tertulis dalam Al Qur'an tentang asal hukum wajib sunat ini dan alasan kedua adalah pembolehan sunat bukanlah topik yang disepakati di antara para cendikia Muslim. Atas dasar tersebut, keadaan yang mensyaratkan seseorang untuk sunat bukanlah hal yang wajib untuk menjadi seorang Muslim. Meskipun gagasan ini tampaknya idiosynkratik menurut mayoritas umat Muslim, saya menekankan bahwa kita tidak boleh menyisihkan gagasan ini, tetapi kita harus mendukungnya untuk kemakmuran pendidikan di komunitas Muslim. Kendati demikian mungkin yang lebih penting lagi bahwa tulisan ini membantu untuk memperkenalkan argumen intelektual Muslim yang baru bahwa penalaran moral adalah independen dari (dan bahkan lebih tinggi dari) hukum Islam. Karena kita tidak memiliki alasan kuat dan alasan sekuler (seperti alasan medis) terhadap sunat pada laki-laki didalam setiap keadaan. Kendati demikian, secara moral, saya percaya bahwa tidak beralasan untuk mengatakan bahwa sunat laki-laki itu selalu salah. Muslim yang mendukung sunat pada laki-laki masih dapat dilakukan dengan menemukan beberapa alasan sekuler untuk mempertahankan kegiatan sunat dari identitas budaya ummat muslim.
How to Cite : Dabbagh, H. (2017). The Ethics Of Non-Therapeutic Male Circumcision Under Islamic Law: A Lesson For Educational Prosperity In Muslim Communities . TARBIYA: Journal of Education in Muslim Society, 4(2), 216-223. doi:10.15408/tjems.v4i2.6017.
Permalink/DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15408/tjems.v4i2.601
The exegesis of Tabatabaei and the Hermeneutics of Hirsch: a comparative study
This thesis is a comparative study between Hermeneutics on the one hand and exegesis of the Holy Qur'an on the other. Its objective is to discover whether there are salient points of convergence between the two disciples, and whether issues germane to the Hermeneutical tradition in the West have been referred to and/or employed in Muslim works of Qur'an commentary. To this end, the works of one of the most prominent Shi'ite philosophers and exegetes. Allama Mohammad Hossein Tabataei, have been analysed and compared with the perspective and methodology of E D. Hirsch, one of the most important hermeneuticians in the Western World. Hirsch has been chosen since, in the opinion of the author, there is a considerable number of commonalities between the Hirschian approach to hermeneutics and the exegetical methodology of Tabatabaei and other Shi'ite Muslim interpreters of the Qur'an.. Hirsch, as an objectivist, along with a number of other Hermeneutical scholars, are critical of those who subscribe to philosophical Hermeneutics, such as Heideger and Gadimer. The same approach is taken in Tabatabaei's works, thus providing a strong rationale for an academic comparison of these two scholars. For this reason, this thesis attempts to study the theories of Tabatabaei and Hirsch in order to highlight the similarities and differences in their works. The central hypothesis is that while small differences in approach exist, there is much common ground, and that it is possible to use certain facets of Hirschian hermeneutics in the interpretation of the Qur'an, thus modernising some of the existing exegetical approaches employed by Shi'ite scholars.Since the aim of this thesis is to compare the interpretive works of Tabatabaei with those of Hirsch's, an introductory chapter has been dedicated to the study of the evolution of Shi'ite exegesis from the beginning to date. Tabatabaei's Al-Mizan has been chosen as the foremost work of Shi'ite exegesis in the modem period. Furthermore, a complete chapter has also been dedicated to Tabatabai's exegetical modus operandi as reflected in Al-Mizan, in order to arrive at a better understanding of his perspectives. This research arrives at the conclusion that philosophical Hermeneutics and Epistemology have opened new horizons on which we will always be dependent. Whatever interpretive theories with regards to the understanding of the text are accepted, or whatever the tendency as far as literary criticism is concerned, or whatever ideas are accepted in the arena of philosophy of human and social sciences, the discussion of the nature of understanding in general cannot be avoided. This does not mean that Hermeneutics is limited to these new theories. Rather, the opportunity always exists to introduce new interpretive theories in connection with the understanding of the text. It is indeed possible to study these discussions in detail in a separate sphere independent of the other branches of Islamic sciences and arrive at a number of stable principles in the interpretation of the text in Islamic research
"Behind the Plan to Bomb Iran"
Ismael Hossein-zadeh is a professor of economics at Drake University, Des Moines, Iowa. He is the author of the newly published book, The Political Economy of U.S. Militarism. His Web page is http://www.cbpa.drake.edu/hossein-zade
"Islamic Fascism?"
Ismael Hossein-zadeh is a professor of economics at Drake University, Des Moines, Iowa. He is the author of the newly published book, The Political Economy of U.S. Militarism. His Web page is http://www.cbpa.drake.edu/hossein-zade
History of Maqtal al-Hossein Documents: From Factual History to Fictional History
The chronological account of Maqtal al-Hossein is a literary work that has been preserved and has become a source of inspiration for the formation of the collective identity of the Shi\u27a. However, Maqtal al-Hossein as a literary work, written based on the subjective understanding of its author, also leaves traces of distortion in the writing of Maqtal al-Hossein itself. This article aims to illustrate the gradual shift of Maqtal al-Hossein\u27s narrative from historical to fictional. This article discusses (1) A discussion of the history of the writing of Maqtal al-Hossein as a development of literacy by previous writers, followed by a review of the history of the writing of the historical kitab Maqtal al-Hossein from the second century to the writing of Maqtal al-Hossein in the tenth century Hijri. (2). A review of the critical analysis of the text of the hadiths of Maqtal al-Hossein that indicated fiction from the third century Hijri to the tenth century Hijri in the two kitabs of Maqtal al-Hossein in the third century and Maqtal al-Hossein in the seventh century Hijri. The conclusion of this article shows that the writing of Maqtal al-Hossein from the period of the third century Hijri to the tenth century Hijri provides an argument about the shift in the historical value of writing the history of Maqtal al-Hossein, from historical facts to fictional narratives. Meanwhile, the writing of Maqtal al-Hossein from the tenth century was also influenced by the various interests of Islamic power at that time
Intuiting Intuition: The Seeming Account of Moral Intuition
In this paper, I introduce and elucidate what seems to me the best understanding of moral intuition with reference to the intellectual seeming account. First, I will explain Bengson’s (and Bealer’s) quasi-perceptualist account of philosophical intuition in terms of intellectual seeming. I then shift from philosophical intuition to moral intuition and will delineate Audi’s doxastic account of moral intuition to argue that the intellectual seeming account of intuition is superior to the doxastic account of intuition. Next, I argue that we can apply our understanding of the intellectual seeming account of philosophical intuition to the moral intuition. To the extent that we can argue for the intellectual seeming account of philosophical intuition, we can have the intellectual seeming account of moral intuitio
The Concept of Radif and Three Paradigms of Persian Music in Contemporary Iran
From 30 years ago onwards, Persian music, under the influence of Western philosophy, has been Westernised in the sense that some elements of Western philosophy have strongly impacted Persian music. In this paper, I intend to propose a critical leap in Persian music which leads to the creation of three different paradigms in Persian music. Philosophically, Persian music can be seen from three perspectives: Transcendental, Secular and Nominalistic. The Transcendental view considers Persian music as something that is related to what comes from high up, i.e. God. In this paradigm, the concept of Radif is a very important element which has a high place in the history of Persian music. Contrarily, the Secular view focuses on the mundane feature of Persian music in the sense that musicians care to produce melodies by humans and for humans. If Transcendentalists consider music as “less is more,” Secularists treat it as “less is bore.” However, the Nominalistic view tries to leave the two previous paradigms behind by not considering any essence for music, and thus focuses on the contextual feature of music. I conclude by saying that we are now dealing with different “Persian musics” rather than “a Persian music”.
DOI: 10.5958/2347-6869.2017.00019.
- …
