1,720,982 research outputs found
P220 DEVELOPMENT OF A NEW PSYCHOLOGICAL TOOL TO IMPROVE PATIENT ABILITIES TO DEAL WITH ESOPHAGECTOMY: PRELIMINARY RESULTS
Aim
This study aims to create a tool for evaluation of patient ability to deal with postoperative course after esophagectomy for cancer.
Background & Methods
Esophagectomy requires patient to be active and compliant to face up to postoperative impairments. Health related quality of life (HRQoL) data in short and medium-term after surgery show that competences used by patients are not appropriate. Lack of patient abilities to manage postoperative course influences patient recovery and reduces HRQoL.
Psychological analysis of patient clinical needs was conducted to identify peculiar patient competences involved after esophagectomy. Four competences (future forethought; context evaluation; consequences of own actions forethought; use of available resources), each relevant to four areas (clinical; familiar; working; daily-activities) were identified and converted in open-ended questions to assess patient level of skills: a 16 questions structured interview was composed.
From April to June 2019 we performed a feasibility study on 18 consecutive patients between 3rd and 15th postoperative day. They underwent esophagectomy for esophageal or esophagogastric junction cancer in two high volume centers. Patients with metastasis, with language problems due to neurological impairment or age <18 were excluded. M.A.D.I.T.-Methodology of Computerized Textual Data Analysis (University of Padua) was used.
Results
Each interview was administered orally to all patients and took 15 minutes. 5 questions were asked to be repeated. No complaints or negative comments were received.
Non-responding percentage was 0,4% (one question in one interview). Textual corpus was composed of 3210 words, passable of analysis. No differences between postoperative days administration were found.
M.A.D.I.T. analysis showed that answers were adequate and pertinent and allowed us to stratify patients in three different levels of competences (low, median, high). No need of additional competences or areas was observed.
Conclusion
This new psychological tool shows content validity, adequacy and pertinence to the study aim. It is understandable, easy, quick to be answered during any postoperative day and useful to identify patients with low abilities to deal with esophagectomy.
Therefore a multicentric study will be conducted to use this tool further in multiple-choice format with a larger number of patients, in order to identify which patients will benefit of psychological intervention for HRQoL improvement
Management of Liver Oligometastatic Esophageal Cancer: Overview and Critical Analysis of the Different Loco-Regional Treatments.
Esophageal cancer (EC) is an aggressive disease that is associated with a poor prognosis. Since metastastic EC is usually considered suitable only for palliative therapy with an estimated 5-year overall survival (OS) less than 5%, the optimal management of patients with liver oligometastatic EC (LOEC) is still undefined. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the different treatment options for LOEC. A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane to identify articles evaluating different treatment strategies for LOEC. Among 828 records that were identified, 20 articles met the inclusion criteria. These studies included patients who have undergone any type of surgical procedure and/or loco-regional therapy. Liver resection resulted in the best survival for patients with low tumor burden (3 lesions): 5-year OS 30-50% versus 8-12% after only chemotherapy (CHT). The 5-year OS of loco-regional therapies was 23% with a local recurrence risk ranging 0-8% for small lesions (2 to 3 cm). An aggressive multidisciplinary approach for LOEC patients may improve survival. Surgery seems to be the treatment of choice for resectable LOEC. If unfeasible, loco-regional therapies may be considered. In order to better select these patients and offer a chance of cure, prospective trials and a definition of treatment protocols are needed
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
