1,720,976 research outputs found
Latissimus dorsi transfer for primary treatment of irreparable rotator cuff tears
No full textAbstract Tratisfer of the musculotendinous unit of the latissimus dorsi
was performed in seven patients (5
men and 2 women, with a mean age
of 57 years) with irreparable rotator
cuff tear who had had no previous
surgery for cuff repair.
Preoperatively, the mean active
shoulder motion was 86° in flexion,
74° in abduction and 22° in external
rotation. One patient had a positive
lift-off test. The average preoperative
Constant and Murley score was
44%. Diagnosis of irreparability of
the cuff lesion was made preoperatively only in one case. In the
remaining patients, the preoperative
data only led to suspect that the tear
was irreparable. At surgery, all
patients had an irreparable tear of the
superoinferior portion of the cuff and
one patient also had a tear of the
subscapularis tendon. In all cases the
latissimus dorsi tendon was inserted
to the greater tuberosity and, in four
cases, to the subscapularis tendon; in
three patients it was sutured to the
bicipital tendon. Postoperatively all
patients had relief of shoulder pain.
The mean improvement in active
flexion, abduction and external rotation was, respectively, 39°, 29® and
10°. At the latest follow-up, the average Constant and Murley score was
64%. The results of surgery were
rated as excellent in three cases,
good in two, fair in one and poor in
one. All patients but one returned to
preoperative work. Transfer of the
latissimus dorsi muscle is an effective procedure for patients in middle
or early elderly age who have an
irreparable tear of the supraspinatus
and infraspinatus tendons
[Male osteoporosis: current treatments and future options].
No full textTo provide indications for currently approved treatments and future options for male osteoporosis, based on the pathogenetic mechanisms of bone loss in the male sex.
DESIGN:
Review of the most significant data reported in the literature.
RESULTS:
Unhealthy lifestyle habits should be modified. Testosterone replacement is indicated only in patients with diagnosis of hypogonadism. Based on the demonstrated pathogenetic role of estrogen lack in bone loss in men, either low doses of this hormone or selective androgen receptor modulators have been proposed for the treatment of male osteoporosis. Bisphosphonates are the only medications approved by Food and Drug Administration for idiopathic and glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis in men. As far as anabolic treatments are concerned, there is not agreement on clinical utility of sodium fluoride. Short-term treatment with parathyroid hormone (PTH) seems to be safe and effective in patients with idiopathic osteoporosis, due to its anabolic action. Therapeutic use of growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor type I (IGF-I), both considered as potential anabolic agents, is still limited because of the high incidence of side effects and relatively transient efficacy, particularly of IGF-I. CONCLUSIONS: Treatments should be selected on the basis of anti-fracture efficacy of various medications, which has been demonstrated so far only for alendronate and risedronate. Although anabolic agents produce noticeable increase of bone mineral density, is still debated if they also reduce fracture incidence in males with osteoporosis
Cost-effectiveness analysis of ceftazidime/avibactam compared to imipenem as empirical treatment for complicated urinary tract infections
Get PDFCeftazidime/avibactam (CAZ-AVI) is a novel, fixed-dose combination antibiotic that has been approved in Europe and the United States for patients with complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) based on results of a Phase III, randomized, comparative study (RECAPTURE study). The present analysis evaluated cost-effectiveness of CAZ-AVI as an empirical treatment for hospitalized patients with cUTIs from the Italian publicly funded healthcare (third-party payer) perspective. A sequential, patient-level simulation model was developed that followed the clinical course of cUTI and generated 5000 pairs of identical patients (CAZ-AVI or imipenem as empirical treatment). The model included additional impact of resistant pathogens; patients who did not respond to empirical treatment were switched to second-line treatment of colistin+high dose carbapenem in both groups. The time horizon of the model was five years, with an annual discount rate of 3% applied to both costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). The analysis demonstrated that an intervention sequence (CAZ-AVI followed by colistin+high dose carbapenem) compared with a comparator sequence (imipenem followed by colistin+high dose carbapenem) was associated with a net incremental cost of €1015 per patient but provided better health outcomes in terms of clinical cure (97.65% vs. 91.08%; ∆ = 6.57%), shorter hospital stays (10.65 vs. 12.55 days; ∆ = 1.90 days), and QALYs gained per patient (4.190 vs. 4.063; ∆ = 0.126). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was €8039/QALY, which is well below the willingness-to-pay threshold of €30 000/QALY in Italy. The results showed that CAZ-AVI is expected to be a cost-effective treatment compared with imipenem for cUTI in Italy
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Cost-effectiveness analysis comparing ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ-AVI) as empirical treatment comparing to ceftolozane/tazobactam and to meropenem for complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI)
No full textBackground: The rising incidence of resistance to currently available antibiotics among pathogens, particularly Gram-negative pathogens, in complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs) has become a challenge for clinicians. Ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ-AVI) is a fixed-dose antibiotic approved in Europe and the United States for treating (in combination with metronidazole) cIAI in adult hospitalised patients who have limited or no alternative treatment options. The approval was based on the results of RECLAIM, a Phase III, parallel-group, comparative study (RECLAIM 1 [NCT01499290] and RECLAIM 2 [NCT01500239]). The objective of our study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of CAZ-AVI plus metronidazole compared with 1) ceftolozane/tazobactam plus metronidazole and 2) meropenem, as an empiric treatment for the management of cIAI in Italy. Methods: A sequential, patient-level simulation model, with a 5-year time horizon and 3% annual discount rate (applied to both costs and health benefits), was developed using Microsoft Excel® to demonstrate the clinical course of the disease. The impact of resistant pathogens was included as an additional factor. Results: In the base-case analysis, the CAZ-AVI sequence (CAZ-AVI plus metronidazole followed by a colistin + tigecycline + high-dose meropenem combination after treatment failure), when compared to sequences for ceftolozane/tazobactam (ceftolozane/tazobactam plus metronidazole followed by colistin + tigecycline + high-dose meropenem after treatment failure) and meropenem (meropenem followed by colistin + tigecycline + high-dose meropenem after treatment failure), had better clinical outcomes with higher cure rates (93.04% vs. 91.52%; 92.98% vs. 90.24%, respectively), shorter hospital stays (â'† =-0.38 and â'† =-1.24 days per patient, respectively), and higher quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained per patient (4.021 vs. 3.982; 4.019 vs. 3.960, respectively). The incremental cost effectiveness ratio in the CAZ-AVI sequence was 4099 and 15,574 per QALY gained versus each comparator sequence, respectively, well below the willingness-to-pay threshold of 30,000 per QALY accepted in Italy. Conclusions: The model results demonstrated that CAZ-AVI plus metronidazole could be a cost-effective alternative when compared with other antibiotic treatment options, as it is expected to provide better clinical benefits in hospitalised patients with cIAI in Italy
Variations on the Author
Get PDF“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Get PDFWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Get PDFWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
