1,721,023 research outputs found
Giovanni Leonardi, L'infanzia di Gesù nei vangeli di Matteo e di Luca (coll. Conoscere il vangelo). 1975
No full textPonthot Joseph. Giovanni Leonardi, L'infanzia di Gesù nei vangeli di Matteo e di Luca (coll. Conoscere il vangelo). 1975. In: Revue théologique de Louvain, 7ᵉ année, fasc. 2, 1976. pp. 238-239
Giovanni Leonardi, L'infanzia di Gesù nei vangeli di Matteo e di Luca (coll. Conoscere il vangelo). 1975
No full textPonthot Joseph. Giovanni Leonardi, L'infanzia di Gesù nei vangeli di Matteo e di Luca (coll. Conoscere il vangelo). 1975. In: Revue théologique de Louvain, 7ᵉ année, fasc. 2, 1976. pp. 238-239
Intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy and stones extraction, pre laparoscopic cholecystectomy for management of patients with associated stones of the gallbladder and main biliary duct.
No full textIntraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy and stones extraction, pre laparoscopic cholecystectomy for management of patients with associated stones of the gallbladder and main biliary duct.
No full text
Il concetto di “range” nelle Riflessioni sull’equilibrio economico di Attilio da Empoli
No full textL’idea di identificare la teoria dell’equilibrio economico di Attilio da Empoli con il “concetto di range” nasce dalla lettura dell’articolo “An old dispute: Umberto Ricci vs. Attilio da Empoli” di A. M. Fusco, che scrive: «In short this price [of equilibrium] may be found not at a certain point but within the range of an interval delimited, at its two extreme points, by marginal and ultramarginal cost» .
L’idea di un range di equilibrio giustifica da sé l’approfondimento del pensiero economico di Attilio da Empoli. Questo concetto, come è facile osservare, si pone infatti fuori dagli schemi analitici ortodossi neoclassici (walrasiani e marshalliani) e propone un nuovo percorso di analisi attraverso il quale studiare la realtà economica, liberandosi dal fardello delle ipotesi estremamente astratte dell’economia “pura”
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
