1,720,960 research outputs found

    Myocardial antioxidant defence mechanisms: time-related changes after reperfusion of the ischemic rat heart

    No full text
    Abstract- It is well known that reperfusion damage of ischemic myocardium may be attributed to alterations in the antioxidant defense system against free radical aggression. In addition, the degree of myocardial damage may depend on the duration and severity of ischemia that precedes reperfusion. We carried out serial ischemic experiments (10, 30, 60 and 120 min) in ex-vivo rat hearts followed by 30 min reperfusion and we assayed the glutathione-dependent enzymatic activities (selenium-dependent glutathione-peroxidase: GSH-Px; selenium-independent glutathione peroxidase: GST-Px; glutathione-transferase: GST and glutathione-reductase: GS-SG-Red), Catalase activity (CAT) and non-proteic thiol compounds (NP-SH) at the end of reperfusion. We found a significant reduction of NP-SH, GSH-Px and CAT in ischemic/reperfused hearts from 30 min on, while GST activity was increased. In addition, we observed the appearance of a selenium-independent glutathione peroxidase activity (GST-Px) belonging to the GST system. In conclusion, we found the longer the duration of ischemia the greater the inbalance between the myocardial antioxidant system especially the GST activation, suggesting in particular for GST-Px, a role in the control of the damage against oxygen toxicity during ischemia/reperfusion

    Regional distribution of glutathione-related antioxidant defences in the normal rabbit aorta.

    No full text
    Abstract- In 6 normal rabbits, the aortic arch, the descending thoracic and the abdominal aorta were tested for non proteic thiol compounds, selenium-dependent and selenium-independent glutatione peroxidase, glutatione reductase, glutatione transferase and thiobarbituric acid reactive substances. The aortic arch showed the greatest content of non proteic thiol compounds and thiobarbituric acid reactive substances, associated to the highest activities of glutathione-related enzymes. However, not significant differences were detectable between aortic arch and descending thoracic aorta, except for the glutathione transferase activity (0.395 +/- 0.031 vs 0.330 +/- 0.053 U/mg protein, p less than 0.05). Furthermore, both aortic arch and descending thoracic aorta showed significantly higher values of non proteic thiol compounds (46.05 +/- 10.15% and 33 +/- 13.5%, p less than 0.05), selenium-dependent glutathione peroxidase activity (70.35 +/- 26% and 54.3 +/- 9.5%, p less than 0.05), glutathione reductase activity (25.4 +/- 7% and 18.4 +/- 4.5%, p less than 0.05) and thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (65.8 +/- 18% and 47.2 +/- 17%, p less than 0.05) with respect to the abdominal aorta. The selenium-independent glutathione peroxidase activity was not detectable. In conclusion, a biochemical gradient in glutathione-related antioxidant defences and thiobarbituric acid reactive substances proceeding from the proximal to the distal segments seems to exist in the normal rabbit aorta. These results could contribute to explain the non homogeneous distribution of experimental atherosclerosis in the rabbit aorta

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Full text link
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods
    corecore