140,524 research outputs found
A critical analysis of the plays of Sarah Daniels.
As one of the forerunners of 'second wave' feminist playwriting, Sarah Daniels has for the
past fifteen years been one of Britain's most prolific writers for the stage. This thesis is the
first to offer a detailed critical analysis of all her published plays along with a developmental
account of her career. My approach throughout is text-based and non-prescriptive,
although I do at certain points indicate where Daniels reflects or voices differing feminist
perspectives. I also consider, beginning in Chapter Three, the critical reception and
'gendered' reviewing the playwright has received over the years.
The thesis is organised into five chapters with an Afterword. Chapter One, the
Introduction, offers an overview of Daniels' career as well as certain key characteristics of
her work. In Chapter Two I analyse the early plays, Ripen Our Darkness, The Devil's
Gateway and Neaptide, and consider in particular how they reflect, along with other
women's playwriting at the time, certain ideals of the Women's Liberation Movement.
Chapter Three is devoted entirely to Masterpieces, Daniels' most controversial and, on
many levels, successful play to date. Chapter Four is an analysis of the 'history plays',
Byrthrite and The Gut Girls. In addition to giving voice to women traditionally silenced in
and by history, these plays (especially Byrthrite) also echo particular strands of modern
feminist debate. Chapter Five examines Daniels' plays of the 1990s (Beside Herself, Head-
Rot Holiday and The Madness of Esme and Shaz) with their central theme of 'women and
madness'. This is also a fitting theme with which to conclude the thesis as it brings together
and expands on the most significant motif running throughout the playwright's work. In the
Afterword I consider the effect of Esme and Shaz's critical reception on Daniels, as well as
her current 'work in progress'. Finally, the two Appendices provide a chronological table of
Daniels' productions and a list of subsequent professional productions as well as awards
Riccia sarieae A. E. D. Daniels & D. T. T. Daniels A. Thalli B. Thallus 2022, sp. nov.
Riccia sarieae A.E.D. Daniels & D.T.T. Daniels, sp. nov. (Figures 1–2) Holotype: — India, Western Ghats, Tamil Nadu, Kanniyakumari District, Marunthuvazhmalai, an open hillock, on damp soil-covered rocks, at ca 40 m a.s.l, 08˚07.758ʹ N and 77˚30.851ʹ E, 2 October 2021, D.T.T. Daniels 17 (holotype: CAL; isotype: SCCN), 20, 34, 35 (Paratypes: SCCN). Plants monoicous, in overlapping patches. Thallus 1.5–4 × 1–2 mm, simple or once dichotomously branched, lanceolate to oblong-lanceolate, bluish-green to rarely green. Ventral scales prominent, semilunar, not extending beyond margin, purple, closing over the dorsal surface when dry. Rhizoids numerous, smooth and tuberculate. Thalli dorsally sulcate towards apex and disappearing at base, twice or thrice as broad as high in cross section, ventrally convex, parabolic near apex with tubers; air spaces narrow, slit-like; epidermal cells quadrate to rounded-quadrate, hyaline, collapsing when mature with the lower part thickened and persisting, attached to a second layer of cells.Antheridia and archegonia along mid-dorsal groove; antheridial ostioles conspicuous. Sporogonia along mid-dorsal groove. Spores 64–80 × 48–64 µm, ovoid to roughly tetrahedral, crenulate, brown, 9–11 areolae on distal face; areolations ridged; triradiate mark faint. Habitat: On soil-covered rocks, in open hillock, ca 40 m. Distribution: India: Western Ghats, Tamil Nadu (Kanniyakumari). (Figure 3) Specimens examined: INDIA. Western Ghats: Tamil Nadu, Kanniyakumari District, Marunthuvazhmalai, ca 40 m, 08˚07.758ʹ N and 77˚30.851ʹ E, 2 October 2021, D.T.T. Daniels 17, 20, 34, 35. Etymology Named after Dr. Sarie Magdalena Perold (1928–2011), who was recognized as a leading authority on the taxonomy and nomenclature of African thallose liverworts, especially the genus Riccia. Discussion Riccia sarieae shows a close resemblance to the cosmopolitan species Riccia sorocarpa which shows a disjunct distribution in India by its occurrence on the Himalaya in the North and the Western Ghats in the South. However, some gametophytic characters and the spore morphology of the species in question are distinct from that of the putative species. Riccia sarieae is a monoicous species with bluish-green thalli. In cross section, the thallus is roughly parabolic with the epidermal cells collapsing at maturity. These are characters more or less similar to that of R. sorocarpa. However, characters that can be attributed to R. sarieae are the presence of ventral tubers at the apex which are absent in R. sorocarpa, quadrate to rounded-quadrate epidermal cells which are ovate and mamillate at the apex in R. sorocarpa; ovoid to roughly tetrahedral spores lacking an equatorial wing and distinctly ridged areolae versus spores that are tetrahedral and winged with faint ridges in the case of R. sorocarpa. Riccia sarieae also shows some resemblance to that of R. velimalaiana Daniels & Daniel (2002: 139) which possesses a simple or once dichotomously branched thallus, purple ventral scales, the crenulate spores lacking an equatorial wing. However, R. sarieae differs from the latter in having a lanceolate thallus not obovate; ventral scales not protruding beyond thallus margin but protruding in R. velimalaiana and spores being ovoid to roughly tetrahedral with a faint triradiate mark whereas in R. velimalaiana the spores are tetrahedral with a distinct triradiate mark. Riccia boliviensis Jovet-Ast. (1991: 242), reported by Asthana and Srivastava (2021) from the Eastern Ghats of Peninsular India, has unique features such as green thalli with ventral scales extending beyond the thallus margin, tetrahedral spores with equatorial wing, vermiculate areolation and a distinct triradiate mark distinguishing R. boliviensis from R. sarieae. Riccia sarieae completes its life cycle within a short span of time between the month of July and October.Although it was collected on exposed soil-covered rocks in Scrub forests, the prevailing forest type in that locality, it could not be found fresh before or after monsoon rains. On the other hand, the presence of tubers at the apex suggests that R. sarieae is more of an ephemeral species than a xeromorphic one.Published as part of Daniels, A. E. D. & Daniels, D. T. T., 2022, Riccia sarieae (Ricciaceae: Marchantiophyta) - a new species from a fragmented hillock of the Western Ghats, India, pp. 201-205 in Phytotaxa 554 (2) on pages 203-205, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.554.2.8, http://zenodo.org/record/682099
Ommatius aquilonaris Daniels, 2017, sp. nov.
Ommatius aquilonaris sp. nov. (Figs 2, 4, 10–27, 110) Diagnosis. The combination of shining tomentum on the thoracic sclerites, a very weak anepimeral bristle (Fig. 2), semi-transparent legs, and in males, sternites 3 and 4 with lateral bristles, barbed setae on the apical portion of the gonocoxite (Figs 10, 11) and the basally fused hypandrium and gonocoxite (Figs 13, 19) characterize this species. Type material. HOLOTYPE ♂, AUSTRALIA. Queensland. rainforest // West Claudie River, / 4 km SW road junction / Qld 1244’ S 14315 ’E / 29 Nov 1986 / G. Daniels / M.A. Schneider / (QM Reg. No. UQIC 7554). PARATYPES. Queensland. 2 ♀, 4–5 km SW Portland Roads 6.vii.1982 G. Daniels M.A. Schneider (QM); 1 ♀, approx. 11 km from Portland Roads on Iron Range Road 21.ix.1974 M.S. Moulds (AM); 1 ♂, 3 ♀, Gordon Creek area, Claudie Riv. district 24.vi.–4.vii.1982 M.A. Schneider G. Daniels UQIC 7342 (QM); 1 ♂, 4 ♀, Gordon Creek, Claudie Riv. district 1242’ S 14317 ’E 10.xii.1986 G. Daniels M.A. Schneider (QM); 1 ♂, 3 ♀, Gordon Ck, Claudie Riv. District 1242.79’S 14317.97’E 50 m 2–4.i.1995 G. and A. Daniels rain forest (AM); 2 ♂, same data except 28.xii.1995 – 2.i.1996 (AM); 1 ♂, same data except 7.xii.1997 G. Daniels (AM); 2 ♂, 4 ♀, hut nr East Claudie Riv., Iron Ra. Nat. Pk 1242’37” S 14317 ’32”E 1–4.i.1996 G. and A. Daniels (AM); 1 ♀, beginning of Mt Lamond track, Iron Ra. Nat. Pk 1243’34 S 14217 ’06”E 2.i.1996 20 m G. and A. Daniels (AM); 1 ♂, East Claudie Riv. Iron Range site 2, 12.43’41” S 143.17 ’01”E 3.i.1996 20 m G. and A. Daniels (AM); 1 ♀, Iron Ra., West Claudie R., r’forest 7.xii.1985 D. Yeates (QM); 1 ♀, Phillip Hill, Iron Range, Claudie Riv. Dist. 1244’ S 14318 ’E 9.i.1994 G. and A. Daniels (AM); 7 ♂, 3 ♀, same data except 4.i.1996 140 m (AM); 2 ♂, same data except 7.vi.1995 G. Daniels (AM); 12 ♂, 4 ♀, Middle Claudie Riv., Iron Range 11.ix.–2.xi.1974 G. Daniels (AM); 2 ♂, 1 ♀, Iron Range 1.v.–2.vi.1975 M.S. Moulds (AM); 1 ♂, West Claudie Riv., Iron Ra. 20.ix.1974 M.S. Moulds (AM); 5 ♀, West Claudie Riv., Iron Range Nat. Park 1244.48’S 14314.81’E 50 m 2.i.1995 G. and A. Daniels (AM); 2 ♀, West Claudie R., Iron Range 50m 3–10.xii.1985 G. Monteith & D. Cook rainforest (QM); 3 ♂, 5 ♀, same data except 1243’ S 14312 ’E 50 m 11.vi.1995 G. Daniels (AM); 1 ♂, 2 ♀, same data except 19.ix.2000 50 m G. and A. Daniels on twig, rain forest (AM); 2 ♂, 3 ♀, West Claudie Riv. x-ing, Iron Range, 50 m 1244’ S 14319 ’E 8–9.i.1994 G. and A. Daniels R. Eastwood (AM); 1 ♀, West Claudie Riv., 3.5 km W of road junction, Iron Range 1244’09 S 14315 ’43”E 20 m 2.vii.1997 G. and A. Daniels (AM); 2 ♀, same data except 19.ix.2000 on twig, rain forest (AM); 1 ♂, 4 ♀, West Claudie River, 4 km SW road junction 1244’ S 14315 ’E 26.xi.–6.xii.1986 G. Daniels M.A. Schneider (QM); 8 ♂, 4 ♀, same data except 28.xi.–8.xii.1986 malaise (QM); 1 ♂, 1♀, West Claudie River, 4 km SW road junction 1244.05’S 14315.84’E 40 m 31.xii.1994 G. Daniels rain forest (AM); 1 ♀, 1 km N of ' Eclectus', Iron Ra. 1245’45” S 14317 ’11”E 5.vii.1997 G. and A. Daniels (AM); 1 ♀, ' Eclectus', Iron Range, 1245’46” S 14317 ’10”E 20 m 10.vi.1995 G. Daniels (AM); 1♂, 2 ♀, same data except 28.xii.1995 – 3.i.1996 G. and A. Daniels (AM); 2 ♂, 1 ♀, same data except 4.xii.1997 G. Daniels (AM); 1 ♀, same data except 26.vii.1999 G. and A. Daniels (AM); 1 ♂, 1 ♀, same data except 20.v.2002 G. Daniels on twig in rainforest (AM); 2 ♂, 1 ♀, same data except 9.x.2004 G. and A. Daniels on twig rain forest (AM); 1 ♂, 2 ♀, same data except 1.viii.2006 (AM); 1 ♂, 4 ♀, same data except 13– 20.ix.2005 G. Daniels on twig rain forest (AM); 13 ♂, 18 ♀, same data except 16–18.x.2003 rain forest on twig 15– 30 cm above ground (AM); 1 ♀, same data except 31.vii.2006 G. and A. Daniels rain forest (AM); 1 ♂, swamp nr lower Claudie Riv. sthn bank, Cape York Pen. 25.ix.1974 M.S. Moulds (AM). Non-type material examined. 1 ♀, Phillip Hill, Iron Range, Claudie Riv. Dist. 12°44’S 143°18’E 9.i.1994 G. and A. Daniels (AM); 2 (damaged), West Claudie River, 4 km SW road junction 12°44’S 143°15’E 29.xi.– 5.xii.1986 malaise (QM). Description. Male. Body length, 8.2–8.9 mm; thoracic length, 2.1–2.3 mm; wing length, 6.2–6.6 mm. Head. Face gently rounded, barely protruding beyond eyes in profile and with shining pale yellowish to white tomentum. Mystax with two vertical rows of long thin black bristles; with a medial group of stouter, white bristles above epistoma; lower half of face and along epistomal margin white setose. Ocellar tubercle with short (rarely long) black reclinate setae. Occiput with 4 to 6 long black setae dorsally, weaker and white ventrally. Beard sparse and with branched hairs. Flagellum conical, slightly flattened laterally and longer than pedicel. Style with setae in one rank on basal half, then two distally. Thorax. Ground-colour orange-yellow, mesonotum dorsally and scutellum brown-black. Lateral pleural sclerites silvery tomentose; mesonotum with sparse coppery tomentum, becoming silvery laterally; postpronotal lobe with a few long, pale setae anteriorly. Acrostichal setae seemingly absent but visible when viewed in profile. Presutural dorsocentral bristles absent; 2 pairs of postsutural dorsocentral bristles and 2 long marginal scutellar bristles present; scutellar disc with a few weak, scattered setae. Anepisternum with a few weak setae. Anepimeral bristle (Fig. 2) poorly developed and barely discernable from other nearby setae; anepimeron with a group of fine setae anterior to the anepimeral cleft. Wing (Fig. 110). With microtrichia distributed over apical fourth of wing, present apically in cell r1, cell r2+3, cell r5, cell m1 and cell m2. Costal dilation absent. Vein R4+5 not fused basally to vein R3. Vein r-m well beyond middle of discal cell. Legs. Semitransparent. Femora black, narrowly orange-brown apically. Tibiae orange-brown, darker apically, hind tibia dark brown-black on apical half. Fore and mid metatarsi orange-brown, hind metatarsus brown-black; remainder of tarsal segments brown-black. Fore femur with a ventral row of long, weak setae. Mid femur with an anterior bristle at about middle and another at apical third; a posteroventral row of 4 or 5 weak bristles and a ventral row of weak bristles. Hind femur with an anterior bristle at about middle and another at apical third; an anteroventral row and a posteroventral row of 4 or 5 short, stout bristles. Fore tibia with 2 long posteroventral setae; a short subbasal dorsal seta; a ventral row of 5 weak setae. Mid tibia with a stout anterodorsal bristle at about apical fourth and a similar ventral bristle at about apical third; an anteroventral bristle at about basal third, and a posteroventral row of 3–5 long fine setae, the basal one being the longest and about half the femoral length. Hind tibiae with a subapical anterodorsal bristle and another longer anterior one at apical third; a dorsal and an anteroventral bristle at about middle. Abdomen. Tergites brown, tergites 1–5 pale yellowish posterolaterally, tergites 2–4 pale yellowish on posterior margin. Posterolateral tergal bristles very weak or absent. Terminalia. (Figs 10–13, 17–23). Brown. Tergite 8 (Fig. 21) about half the width of tergite 7; tergite 8 with anterior margin deeply indented and with numerous black, bristles on posterior margin. Sternites 1–7 pale yellowish in dried specimens, transparent in ethanol stored specimens. Sternite 3 with a posterolateral bristle, sternite 4 with a row of lateral bristles, sternite 5 often with an anterolateral bristle. Sternite 8 (Fig. 22) with convex posterior margin and deeply emarginate anterior margin. Cerci (Fig. 12) about 6 times longer than wide, about half the length of epandrium and extending almost to its apex. Subepandrial sclerite (Fig. 23) long and narrow, deeply emarginate on posterior margin and setose laterally. Epandrium (Figs 17, 18) long and narrow, not fused basally but with a narrow, sub-basal apodeme; attenuate and with a complex, 3-pronged distal margin. Hypandrium and gonocoxite (Figs 10, 19) fused basally and almost tubular. Hypandrium (Figs 10, 13, 19) with a subapical fan of numerous, stout bristles; apically with a brush of branched or barbed bristles (Fig. 11); dorsal margin apically with a complex bilobed, proximally toothed process. Gonostylus long and narrow. Aedeagal complex (Fig. 20) with short, narrow, tubular distiphallus; basiphallus proximally with a dorsal, toothed, domed process; ejaculatory apodeme extremely long and narrow; ventral aedeagal apodeme less than half as long as ejaculatory apodeme and dorsally directed proximally. Female. Differs from male as follows: Body length, 7.5–9.0 mm; thoracic length, 2.0– 2.4 mm; wing length, 6.0– 7.2 mm. Abdomen. Tergite 2 pale yellowish on posterior margin; sternites 3–5 lacking lateral bristles. Terminalia. (Figs 14–16, 24–27). Sternite 8 (Fig. 25) with 3 or 4 long, stout bristles and numerous shorter stout bristles; distal margin somewhat rounded and with 2 membranous, submedial areas and a very small medial emargination. Genital fork (Fig. 27) simple, basal half semi-membranous, arms weakly sclerotized and anterior part even less sclerotized. Tergite 9+10 (Figs. 14–16, 24) extremely narrow medially (approx. 0.01 mm) and wider laterally (approx. 0.03 mm); anterior margin more or less straight, posterior margin concave. Sternite 10 (Figs. 14– 16, 24) present as two small, elongate sclerites. Hypoproct (figs 15, 16) not fused, longer than cerci. Cerci fully visible in pinned specimens. Etymology. The specific name is derived from the Latin aquilonaris, ‘northern’, the most northerly species dealt with in this revision. Distribution (Fig. 4). Known only from the Iron Range area, Cape York Peninsula, northern Qld.Published as part of Daniels, Greg, 2017, Australian species of Ommatius Wiedemann (Diptera: Asilidae) with an anepimeral bristle, pp. 535-563 in Zootaxa 4231 (4) on pages 539-543, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4231.4.3, http://zenodo.org/record/29265
Endarch Interview with Dr. Ron Daniels
We also present two interviews with Dr. Ron Daniels and Richard Adams, who are respectively the president and chair of the board of the Institute for the Black World 21st Century. Dr. Daniels is highly regarded as one of the leading scholar activists of his era. Richard Adams has served for several decades as a community organizer and activist. He has worked with many local grassroots group to address problematic conditions. With their wide experiences and keen insights Daniels and Adams address a wide array of concerns about ways and means for enhancing cooperative efforts among progressive groups, the prospects for Pan-Africanism in the 21st century, and building responsible leadership that will push to empower Black communities
Nesonautes Cumberlidge & Daniels 2022, GEN. NOV.
GENUS NESONAUTES GEN. NOV. (FIGS 1B 2, 4G–I, 9C; TABLES 1–3) Zoobank registration: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 558E16D5-0F1C-45CE-A1AE-F1F2438C5758. Thelphusa A. Milne-Edwards, 1869: 185, pl. 9, fig. 4, fig. 4a–b; Greef, 1882: 37; 1884: 54; A. Milne-Edwards, 1886: 150; 1887: 130; Ozorio, 1887: 221; 1889: 129, 132; 1892: 199; 1905: 149. Telphusa Brito-Capello, 1871: pl. 2, fig. 12 [not A. Milne-Edwards]. Potamon (Potamonautes) Ortmann, 1897: 304, 308; Rathbun, 1900: 283; 1904: pl. 14, fig. 10; 1905: 168–169; De Man, 1914: 135. Potamon Chace, 1942: 216. Potamonautes (Platypotamonautes) Bott, 1955: 229, 235, pl. XXX: figs la–d, 11 (only Po. (Pl.) margaritarius = N. margaritarius comb. nov.; not Po. (Pl.) ecorssei = Occidensonautes ecorssei comb. nov., Po. (Pl.) platynotus = Arcopotamonautes platynotus comb. nov., Po. (Pl.) pilosus = Rotundopotamonautes pilosus comb. nov., Potamonautes (Rotundopotamonautes) neumanni = Rotundopotamonautes neumanni comb. nov. Potamonautes margaritarius Balss, 1914: 102; Ng et al., 2008: 171; Cumberlidge, 2008: 72, 77, tab. 1; 2011: 79, 82–83, tabs 6.1, 6.3; Daniels & Klaus, 2018: 119–127, figs 1–3, tab 1; Cumberlidge & Daniels, 2018: 289–295, figs 1–3. Diagnosis: G1 TA long (TA/SA 0.45–0.48 length of G1 SA); G1 TA angled at 45° to the longitudinal axis of G1 SA; G1 TA widened in the middle (dorsal fold higher than ventral fold); G1 TA terminating in highly upcurved tip (Fig. 4G –I); carapace flattened (CH /FW 1.0); anterolateral margin behind epibranchial tooth either finely toothed or granular; third maxilliped ischium smooth, lacking vertical suture. Etymology: The genus name is a combination of the Greek νήσος, island, and ναύτες seamen, “- nautes ” being a common suffix for freshwater crabs. This to recognize that this genus of freshwater crabs is endemic to São Tomé Island. The gender is masculine. Type species: Thelphusa margaritaria A. Milne- Edwards, 1869, by present designation. Species included: Nesonautes margaritarius (A. Milne- Edwards, 1869) comb. nov. and Nesonautes saotome (Cumberlidge & Daniels, 2018) comb. nov. Distribution: Nesonautes species are endemic to São Tomé Island (São Tomé and Príncipe) (Daniels & Klaus, 2018; Cumberlidge & Daniels, 2018; Fig. 9C). Remarks: Nesonautes is established here to accommodate two species of freshwater crabs that are endemic to São Tomé Island, which were previously considered to be species of Potamonautes s.l. (Bott, 1955; Cumberlidge & Daniels, 2018). A new genus is necessary because these two species form a unique genetic lineage separate from the large clade for Potamonautini (Fig. 1B 3) and the clade formed by Erimetopus, Longipotamonautes and Occidensonautes (Daniels & Klaus, 2018). Because neither of the included species is the type species of a genus or a subgenus, a new genus name is provided here. Bott (1955) included N. margaritarius (as P. margaritarius) as one of five species in his subgenus Potamonautes (Platypotamonautes) (together with Potamonautes ecorssei, Potamonautes platynotus, Potamonautes pilosus and Potamonautes neumanni). However, subgenus P. (Platypotamonautes) is not monophyletic because the species he included were found here to belong to four different phylogenetic lineages (Daniels et al., 2006, 2015; Fig. 1) and it is therefore not recognized here. Potamonautes margaritarius i s t h u s a s s i g n e d t o N e s o n a u t e s, P. e c o rs s e i i s transferred to Occidensonautes. Potamonautes platynotus is moved here to Arcopotamonautes and P. pilosus and P. neumanni are now assigned to Rotundopotamonautes.Published as part of Cumberlidge, Neil & Daniels, Savel R., 2022, A new multilocus phylogeny reveals overlooked diversity in African freshwater crabs (Brachyura: Potamoidea): a major revision with new higher taxa and genera, pp. 1268-1311 in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 194 (4) on pages 1291-1292, DOI: 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlab082, http://zenodo.org/record/646147
Recommended from our members
Daniels Hall Cornerstone Ceremony
Ross Alger presents trowel to F. H. Daniels as President Storke and D. C. Daniels look o
Job control and occupational health: the moderating role of national R&D activity
Daniels and Tregaskis joint lead author
Erimetopini Cumberlidge & Daniels 2022, TRIBE NOV.
ERIMETOPINI TRIBE NOV. (FIGS 1B 2, 4A–L, 8C; TABLES 1–3) Zoobank registration: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 61AF1486-7B40-4EC9-A244-6875EAD2C1CE. Diagnosis: Third maxilliped ischium smooth, lacking vertical sulcus; epibranchial tooth small, pointed; postfrontal crest distinct, completely traversing carapace. Etymology: Erimetopini is derived from a combination of the English words Congo and West, as a reference to the range of this tribe that includes an area that encompasses the Congo Basin and all of West Africa (Fig. 8C). The gender is masculine. Type genus: Erimetopus Rathbun, 1894. G e n e r a i n c l u d e d: E r i m e t o p u s R a t h b u n, 1 8 9 4, Longipotamonautes (Bott, 1955) stat. nov., Nesonautes gen. nov. and Occidensonautes gen. nov. Distribution: Erimetopini is found in West and Central Africa in the following countries: Erimetopus occurs in the Republic of the Congo and the D.R. Congo (Fig. 9A), Longipotamonautes occurs in Nigeria, Cameroon, the D.R. Congo, the Central African Republic, Gabon and the Republic of the Congo (Fig. 9B), Nesonautes is endemic to São Tomé Island (Fig. 9C) and Occidensonautes is found in West Africa from Senegal to Nigeria (Fig. 9D). Remarks: Each of the four genera in this tribe has been recovered as a well-supported lineage in the clade for Erimetopini (Fig. 1B 2) and these relationships are also supported by other recent molecular studies of these taxa (Daniels & Klaus, 2018: fig. 1; Wood et al., 2019: fig. 1). The genera can be distinguished from each other by differences in the G1 TA (Fig. 4A–L; see key to genera above).Published as part of Cumberlidge, Neil & Daniels, Savel R., 2022, A new multilocus phylogeny reveals overlooked diversity in African freshwater crabs (Brachyura: Potamoidea): a major revision with new higher taxa and genera, pp. 1268-1311 in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 194 (4) on page 1290, DOI: 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlab082, http://zenodo.org/record/646147
Is this the promis'd end?: reinventing King Lear for a brazilian audience
Dissertação [mestrado] - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Centro de Cominicação e Expressão. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Letras/Inglês e Literatura Correspondente.Análise da peça King Lear de William Shakespeare e as possibilidades inseridas em performances de diferentes produções, começando com o teatro Elisabetano na Inglaterra, até chegar ao Brasil contemporâneo. As produções foram consideradas especialmente em suas relações com o contexto sócio-cultural. O estudo prossegue com um exame detalhado da produção brasileira dirigida por Ron Daniels, ressaltando as questões comerciais e a reação da crítica e da audiência contemporâneas
- …
