1,721,120 research outputs found

    Frederick D. Rossini

    No full text
    FREDERICK D. ROSSINI NBS: 1928 -1950 Birth: July 18, 1899, Monongahela, Pennsylvania Death: October 12, 1990, Juno Beach, Florida EDUCATION: Carnegie Institute of Technology: BS (Chemical Engineering), 1926; MS (Physical Chemistry), 1926; ScD (honorary), 1948 University of California, Berkeley, PhD (Physical Chemistry), 1928 PRINCIPAL FIELDS: Thermodynamics; thermochemistry; physical chemistry of hydrocarbons POSITIONS HELD AT NBS: Chief, Thermochemistry Section HONORS: U.S. Department of Commerce Gold Medal, 1950 Chemical Society of Washington Hillebrand Award, 1934 American Chemical Society: William H. Nichols Medal, 1966; Priestley Medal, 1971 National Medal of Science, 1977 Elected to Sigma Xi MEMBERSHIPS: American Association for the Advancement of Science (Fellow) American Institute of Chemists (Fellow) American Physical Society (Fellow) American Institute of Chemical Engineers American Petroleum Institute American Society for Engineering Education American Society for Testing Materials National Academy of Sciences Philosophical Society of Washington Washington Academy of Sciences (Editor of journal; Secretary; President) Cosmos Club PUBLICATIONS: Author or co author of 265 scientific publications, including eleven books. Co author of The Thermochemistry of the Chemical Substances, Reinhold, 1936, which received world wide recognition. This book was revised and expanded as Selected Values of Chemical Thermodynamics Properties, published as NBS Circular 500 in 1952, which has been called "the Bible of chemical thermodynamics.

    Dr. Frederick D. Rossini, National Medal of Science winner, Chemistry, 1976

    No full text
    Black and white photograph of Doctor Frederick D. Rossini posing in front of a blackboard. Doctor Rossini was the winner of the National Medal of Science in1976 for contributions to basic reference knowledge in chemical thermodynamics

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Full text link
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    Author Index

    No full text
    Nao informado

    koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist

    No full text
    We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
    corecore