1,722,759 research outputs found

    [Telegram to Jack Ruby from J. D. Harrison, November 24, 1963 #2]

    No full text
    Telegram by J. D. Harrison to Jack Ruby sending him $5.00 to provide for his legal defense

    [Telegram to Jack Ruby from J. D. Harrison, November 24, 1963 #1]

    No full text
    Telegram by J. D. Harrison to Jack Ruby sending him $5.00 to provide for his legal defense

    George D. Harrison

    Get PDF
    An obituary for George D. Harrison, educator, farmer, and politician

    George D. Harrison

    Get PDF
    An obituary for George D. Harrison, educator, farmer, and politician

    Owen D. Harrison

    No full text
    Picture of Owen D. Harrison (Deedie) as a baby nickname was Deedi

    Arlan D. Harrison

    No full text
    Arlan D. Harrison, a serviceman from Uintah County killed in action during World II

    James D. Harrison

    No full text
    James D. Harrison was a Director and Associate Professor at the School of Dentistry in the mid-1960s [Image published in 1965 Archive Yearbook, page 114.

    James D. Harrison

    No full text
    James D. Harrison was a Director and Associate Professor at the School of Dentistry in the mid-1960s [Image published in the 1969 Archive Yearbook, p. 123

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore