1,720,958 research outputs found
AI-Powered Biodiversity Assessment: Species Classification via DNA Barcoding and Deep Learning
Only 1.2 million out of an estimated 8.7 million species on Earth have been fully classified through taxonomy. As biodiversity loss accelerates, ecologists are urgently revising conservation strategies, but the “taxonomic impediment” remains a significant barrier, limiting effective access to and understanding of taxonomic data for many researchers. As sequencing technologies advance, short DNA sequence fragments increasingly serve as DNA barcodes for species identification. Rapid acquisition of DNA sequences from diverse organisms is now possible, highlighting the increasing significance of DNA sequence analysis tools in species identification. This study introduces a new approach for species classification with DNA barcodes based on an ensemble of deep neural networks (DNNs). Several techniques are proposed and empirically evaluated for converting raw DNA sequence data into images fed into the DNNs. The best-performing approach is obtained by representing each pair of DNA bases with the value of a related physicochemical property. By utilizing different physicochemical properties, we can create an ensemble of networks. Our proposed ensemble obtains state-of-the-art performance on both simulated and real datasets
Data augmentation for deep ensembles in polyp segmentation
The last few years have witnessed a growing interest among computer vision researchers in semantic segmentation, which, in general, learns low-level features and the semantics of an image via an encoder-decoder structure. In brief, the task of the encoder is to extract features by exploiting convolutional layers; the job of the decoder is to generate the same image by applying skip connections in the first layer. This chapter aims to test different data augmentation approaches for boosting segmentation performance by taking DeepLabv3+ as the architecture and ResNet18/ResNet50 as the backbone. The proposed set of data augmentation approaches is coupled with an ensemble of networks obtained by randomly changing the activation functions inside the network multiple times. Moreover, the proposed approach is combined with HardNet-SEG, a recent architecture for semantic segmentation, for a further boost of the performance
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
An Empirical Study on Ensemble of Segmentation Approaches
Recognizing objects in images requires complex skills that involve knowledge about the context and the ability to identify the borders of the objects. In computer vision, this task is called semantic segmentation and it pertains to the classification of each pixel in an image. The task is of main importance in many real-life scenarios: in autonomous vehicles, it allows the identification of objects surrounding the vehicle; in medical diagnosis, it improves the ability of early detecting of dangerous pathologies and thus mitigates the risk of serious consequences. In this work, we propose a new ensemble method able to solve the semantic segmentation task. The model is based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and transformers. An ensemble uses many different models whose predictions are aggregated to form the output of the ensemble system. The performance and quality of the ensemble prediction are strongly connected with some factors; one of the most important is the diversity among individual models. In our approach, this is enforced by adopting different loss functions and testing different data augmentations. We developed the proposed method by combining DeepLabV3+, HarDNet-MSEG, and Pyramid Vision Transformers. The developed solution was then assessed through an extensive empirical evaluation in five different scenarios: polyp detection, skin detection, leukocytes recognition, environmental microorganism detection, and butterfly recognition. The model provides state-of-the-art results
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
