1,721,325 research outputs found
Curran, P G, 8870
No full textThis record was harvested from a previous catalogue system and will be withdrawn in 2025. Information in this record may be superseded or incomplete. Visit this record in UMA's new catalogue at: https://archives.library.unimelb.edu.au/nodes/view/380079Surname: CURRAN
Given Name(s) or Initials: P G
Military Service Number or Last Known Location: 8870
Missing, Wounded and Prisoner of War Enquiry Card Index Number: 20628193891
Item: [2016.0049.12372] "Curran, P G, 8870
A slow-fast dynamics model of a second-order log-domain floating-capacitor LC-ladder circuit
No full textRelationship between the meris vegetation indices and crop yield for the state of South Dakota, USA
No full text
On the modeling of log-domain LC-ladder circuits
No full textLog-domain filters are an intriguing form of
current-mode circuits. They are universally regarded
as externally-linear internally-nonlinear circuits in
which each bipolar junction transistor operates in the
forward-active mode at all times and acts as a static
exponential non-linearity relating the collector current
to the base-emitter voltage. This paper establishes
sufficient conditions for the external linearity of single-
ended and differential log-domain LC ladder circuits.
However, differential log-domain LC ladder floating-
capacitor circuits exhibit externally-nonlinear
behaviour. Modeling the transistors as static non-
linearities, the equations of these circuits are unable to
describe their nonlinear behaviour. Simulations show
the strong influence of parasitics on these dynamics
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
