1,721,107 research outputs found
INTEGRATED IMPLEMENTATION OF INNOVATIVE INTERSECTION DESIGNS (PROJECT F)
These files belong to a research project on evaluating different bicycle and pedestrian crossing options at Continuous Flow Intersections (CFI). These are the simulation models for different CFI crossing alternatives for pedestrians and bicycles. Three parameters were varied to create the scenario: a) number of displaced left turn legs (4 vs. 2) b) right turn signalization (signalized vs. unsignalized) c) crossing types (traditional vs. midblock vs. offset). In addition to the CFI models, equivalent standard intersection models are also included here. The models were created using VISSIM 10 (64 bit) software. Users may need to show the VISSIM file to the corresponding .rbc files for each signal controller.
If the user is not familiar with how to point to an .rbc file for a signal controller in a vissim, it is recommended that the user learns that first from VISSIM user manual. The .rbc files in each scenario folder are named as the signal controller name.
The names of the folders were shorten. Their names and what scenario they represent are listed below.
Standard_4leg_Unsignalized: Standard intersection equivalent to the CFI volume that has displaced left-turn lanes (DLTs) at all legs and the right-turn lanes signalized
Standard_4leg_Signalized: Standard intersection equivalent to the CFI volume that has DLTs at all legs and the right-turn lanes signalized
Standard_2leg_Unsignalized: Standard intersection equivalent to the CFI volume that has DLTs at two legs and the right-turn lanes unsignalized
Standard_2leg_Signalized: Standard intersection equivalent to the CFI volume that has DLTs at two legs and the right-turn lanes signalized
CFI_4leg_Traditional_Unsignalized: CFI with displaced left-turn lanes on all approaches, traditional ped-bicycle crossing, and the right-turn lanes unsignalized
CFI_4leg_Traditional_Signalized: CFI with displaced left-turn lanes on all approaches, traditional ped-bicycle crossing, and the right-turn lanes signalized
CFI_2leg_Traditional_Unsignalized: CFI with displaced left-turn lanes on two approaches, traditional ped-bicycle crossing, and the right-turn lanes unsignalized
CFI_2leg_Traditional_Signalized: CFI with displaced left-turn lanes on two approaches, traditional ped-bicycle crossing, and the right-turn lanes signalized
CFI_4leg_Offset_Unsignalized: CFI with displaced left-turn lanes on all approaches, offset ped-bicycle crossing, and the right-turn lanes unsignalized
CFI_4leg_Offset_Signalized: CFI with displaced left-turn lanes on all approaches, offset ped-bicycle crossing, and the right-turn lanes signalized
CFI_2leg_Offset_Unsignalized: CFI with displaced left-turn lanes on two approaches, offset ped-bicycle crossing, and the right-turn lanes unsignalized
CFI_2leg_Offset_Signalized: CFI with displaced left-turn lanes on two approaches, offset ped-bicycle crossing, and the right-turn lanes signalized
CFI_4leg_Midblock_Unsignalized: CFI with displaced left-turn lanes on all approaches, midblock ped-bicycle crossing, and the right-turn lanes unsignalized
CFI_4leg_Midblock_Signalized: CFI with displaced left-turn lanes on all approaches, midblock ped-bicycle crossing, and the right-turn lanes signalized
CFI_2leg_Midblock_Unsignalized: CFI with displaced left-turn lanes on two approaches, midblock ped-bicycle crossing, and the right-turn lanes unsignalized
CFI_2leg_Midblock_Signalized: CFI with displaced left-turn lanes on two approaches, midblock ped-bicycle crossing, and the right-turn lanes signalizedPlease use VISSIM 10.0 to open the file
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
