1,721,121 research outputs found
Costruzione e validazione di un questionario rivolto a Medici in formazione specialistica in Igiene e Medicina Preventiva, riguardante opinioni e conoscenze relative al DL 73/2017 = Design and validation of a questionnaire for assessing Public Health residents' opinions and knowledge regarding the new mandatory vaccination law in Italy (DL 73/2017)
Obiettivi: Le vaccinazioni, pur rappresentando un importante strumento di contrasto alle malattie infettive, risultano essere vittime del loro stesso successo. Fenomeno dimostrato da un preoccupante calo delle coperture tanto in Europa, quanto in Italia. Per tale ragione in Italia, attraverso l’approvazione della Legge 31 luglio 2017, n. 119, è stato reintrodotto l’obbligo vaccinale. Obiettivo del presente lavoro è costruire e validare un questionario utile a indagare le opinioni e conoscenze dei medici in formazione specialistica in Igiene e Medicina Preventiva, circa l’obbligatorietà vaccinale.
Metodo: Il questionario è stato redatto da un team selezionato di specializzandi. Il processo di validazione si è svolto mediante somministrazione del questionario a un panel di 10 specializzandi interni al gruppo di lavoro Vaccini e Vaccine Hesitancy della Consulta degli Specializzandi della Società Italiana di Igiene e Medicina Preventiva. I test statistici adoperati sono stati l’alpha di Cronbach e il Kappa di Cohen.
Risultati: Gli items inclusi nella versione finale del questionario risultano essere 23. Dal processo di validazione si evince un elevato livello di consistenza
interna al questionario con alpha= 0,82. Anche il grado di concordanza risulta essere sostanziale con k= 0,75 ± 0,07. Infine, l’analisi di fattibilità mostra una buona validità, poiché l’80% dei rispondenti dichiara che le domande sono poste in modo chiaro e semplice.
Conclusioni: Gli elevati livelli di alpha di Cronbach e K di Cohen raggiunti permettono di considerare il questionario uno strumento valido ed efficace
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
