1,720,973 research outputs found
UT Southwestern Institutional Repository--New Collections
Get PDFThis document outlines basic criteria for new collections (including stakeholders) in the UT Southwestern Institutional Repository. Last revised/edited: 12/13/2018.This document outlines basic criteria for new collections (including stakeholders) in the UT Southwestern Institutional Repository. Last revised/edited: 12/13/2018
UT Southwestern Institutional Repository--Organization
Get PDFThis document provides an overview on how the UT Southwestern Institutional Repository is organized. Communities, subcommunities, collections, items, and files are summarized. Last reviewed/edited: 12/13/2018.This document provides an overview on how the UT Southwestern Institutional Repository is organized. Communities, subcommunities, collections, items, and files are summarized. Last reviewed/edited: 12/13/2018
UT Southwestern Institutional Repository--Items
Get PDFThis document outlines procedures for adding new items. It covers minimum metadata and access requirements, additional item enhancements, file considerations, and visibility. Last reviewed/edited: 12/13/2018.This document outlines procedures for adding new items. It covers minimum metadata and access requirements, additional item enhancements, file considerations, and visibility. Last reviewed/edited: 12/13/2018
UT Southwestern Institutional Repository--FAQ
Get PDFThis document covers some frequently-asked questions about the UT Southwestern Institutional Repository. Last reviewed/edited: 4/25/2024.This document covers some frequently-asked questions about the UT Southwestern Institutional Repository. Last reviewed/edited: 4/25/2024.FAQ: What is an institutional repository? What kind of files can be added? What kind of content can be added? What kind of content cannot be added? Are there space limitations? Can audio or video be viewed directly in the web browser? What kind of access is available for files? What kind of access is available for metadata (descriptive information about files)? Who maintains the institutional repository? What are the benefits of adding material to the institutional repository? I would like an entire collection to be added. What is involved? Can I just have a collection up for a short period of time, such as a semester? I want to be able to deposit items into a collection for a department or class. What kind of training is available? Where is training provided? Who do I contact for more information
Institutional Repository--Journal Article Information for Authors
No full textThis document covers information about compliance with journal publishers for authors, and information about supplemental data deposits. Last reviewed/edited: 12/13/2018.This document covers information about compliance with journal publishers for authors, and information about supplemental data deposits. Last reviewed/edited: 12/13/2018
Making ORCID Work for All: Evaluating Graduate Student ORCID iD and Scopus ID Usage and Citation Results for Administrative Reporting
No full textReport the on the findings of comparing citation information publicly available from ORCID and Scopus ID records of UT Southwestern graduate students and postdocs.PURPOSE: The purpose was to evaluate the current efficacy of ORCID iDs in Scopus by comparing citation information from ORCID and Scopus ID records
SETTING/PARTICIPANTS/RESOURCES: Spreadsheet of current and recently matriculated graduate students (626) from our institution for citation count report.
METHODOLOGY: Analysis and compilation of Scopus and ORCID author and citation search results, as well as existing linked ORCID iDs from campus database.
RESULTS/OUTCOMES: 1. 17.5% (109) of students have a reliable, ORCID iD primary source for current citation(s), greater or equal to Scopus results 2. At least 88% (443) have active Scopus ID records (includes 96 from Question #1 with "equal to Scopus" designation) 3. 10% (62) have no citations to report (no Scopus ID and blank/ no ORCID account) 4. 17% (106) had multiple Scopus ID matches and ORCID name matches, requiring further clarification 5. 36% (227) of students had ORCID accounts registered with the institution 6. 31% (195) of students had distinct name matches/information with ORCID accounts not registered with the institution
DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Only 9% of graduate students have an active ORCID record that campus Information Resources (I.R.) could pull current citation information from. At least 88% of graduate students have Scopus IDs that could be pulled by I.R. Therefore, Scopus IDs are currently more reliable for obtaining citation information for reporting with author order. Whereas some non-Scopus APIs in ORCID provide helpful month publication date data. Educational materials/training on various ID linking practices in databases and using APIs within ORCID is recommended
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Get PDF“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Get PDFWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
- …
