1,721,345 research outputs found
FragExplorer: GRID-Based Fragment Growing and Replacement
No full textUnderstanding which chemical modifications can be made to known ligands is a key aspect of structure-based drug design and one that was pioneered by the software GRID. We developed FragExplorer with the explicit aim of showing GRID users which fragments would best match the GRID molecular interaction fields in a protein binding site, given a bound ligand as a starting point. Users can grow ligands or replace existing moieties; the R-Group Exploration mode identifies all potential R-Groups and searches for replacements automatically; the Scaffold Exploration mode does the same for all potential scaffolds. For a ligand with three points of variation, R-Group Exploration will typically explore a chemical space of 1016 potential molecules; including Scaffold Exploration increases this to 1022. FragExplorer was designed to be integrated within an interactive 3D Editor/Designer; therefore, the speed of computation was an important consideration; a typical fragment search takes 20 seconds. In a fragment reprediction test, FragExplorer demonstrates an overall fragment retrieval rate of 55%, increasing to 69% for smaller fragments. At a 90% substructural match, the retrieval rate increases to ∼80%. We also show how the approach could have been used to hop from olmesartan to azilsartan or to optimize a p38 MAP kinase lead to a compound that bears similarity to a known nanomolar inhibitor
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
BioGPS: Navigating biological space to predict polypharmacology, off-targeting, and selectivity
No full textThe structural comparison of protein binding sites is increasingly important in drug design; identifying structurally similar sites can be useful for techniques such as drug repurposing, and also in a polypharmacological approach to deliberately affect multiple targets in a disease pathway, or to explain unwanted off-target effects. Once similar sites are identified, identifying local differences can aid in the design of selectivity. Such an approach moves away from the classical “one target one drug” approach and toward a wider systems biology paradigm. Here, we report a semiautomated approach, called BioGPS, that is based on the software FLAP which combines GRID Molecular Interactions Fields (MIFs) and pharmacophoric fingerprints. BioGPS comprises the automatic preparation of protein structure data, identification of binding sites, and subsequent comparison by aligning the sites and directly comparing the MIFs. Chemometric approaches are included to reduce the complexity of the resulting data on large datasets, enabling focus on the most relevant information. Individual site similarities can be analyzed in terms of their Pharmacophoric Interaction Field (PIF) similarity, and importantly the differences in their PIFs can be extracted. Here we describe the BioGPS approach, and demonstrate its applicability to rationalize off-target effects (ERα and SERCA), to classify protein families and explain polypharmacology (ABL1 kinase and NQO2), and to rationalize selectivity between subfamilies (MAP kinases p38α/ERK2 and PPARδ/PPARγ). The examples shown demonstrate a significant validation of the method and illustrate the effectiveness of the approach. Proteins 2015; 83:517–532. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
DeepGRID: Deep Learning Using GRID Descriptors for BBB Prediction
No full textDeep Learning approaches are able to automatically extract relevant features from the input data and capture nonlinear relationships between the input and output. In this work, we present the GRID-derived AI (GrAId) descriptors, a simple modification to GRID MIFs that facilitate their use in combination with Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) to build Deep Learning models in a rotationally, conformationally, and alignment-independent approach we are calling DeepGRID. To our knowledge, this is the first time that GRID MIFs have been combined with CNNs in a Deep Learning approach. We applied the approach to build regression and classification models for blood-brain barrier permeation, an important factor when designing CNS drugs and conversely when designing to avoid off-target effects for CNS-inactive drugs. The VolSurf approach was one of the first to successfully model this property from three-dimensional structures, using descriptors derived from their GRID Molecular Interaction Fields (MIFs) in combination with PLS. We compared the DeepGRID models with others built using the hand-crafted VolSurf descriptors in combination with both PLS and Random Forest (RF). Both the DeepGRID and RF regression models performed best according to the % of compounds with a Geometric Mean Fold Error (GMFE) within 2-fold of the experimental data. Applying these regression models as classifiers, for the smaller 332 and 416 compound data sets all models performed well with ROC AUC values of & SIM;0.9 on the external test set. For the larger 2105 compound data set, the DeepGRID classifier performed the best with an AUC of 0.87 on the external test set with the RF model having an AUC of 0.84 and the original VolSurf lgBB model having an AUC of 0.83
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
