186,271 research outputs found

    Dataset for the figures in 'Reducing railway-induced ground-borne vibration by using open trenches and soft-filled barriers'

    No full text
    Data for the figures in the paper by Thompson, D., Jiang, J., Toward, M.G.R, Hussein, M.F.M., Ntotsios, E., Dickmans, A., Coulier, P., Lombaert, G. and Degrande, G. (2016) Reducing railway-induced ground-borne vibration by using open trenches and soft-filled barriers. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering</span

    Mitigation of railway induced vibrations by using heavy masses next to the track

    No full text
    The effectiveness of heavy masses next to the track to reduce railway induced vibration is discussed.These heavy masses next to the track could be built as a gabion wall also used as noise barriers or as a concrete wall.Since the performance of mitigation measures on the transmission path is strongly determined by local groundconditions, a parametric study has been performed for a range of possible designs in a set of different ground types. A 2.5D coupled finite element - boundary element methodology was adopted, assuming that the geometry of the problem is invariant in the longitudinal direction along the track. It is found that the gabion walls start to be effective above a mass-spring resonance frequency which is determined by the mass of the gabion wall and the stiffness of the soil. A gabion wall will be more effective at sites with a soft soil. Increasing the mass will improve the insertion loss at lower frequencies. The effectiveness at higher frequencies is increased by making the footprint of the gabion walls as large and stiff as possible, and by placing the masses next to each other without any connection. For homogeneous soil conditions, the effectiveness is nearly independent of the distance behind the walls. When a softer top layer is present, the wave impeding effect is strongly decreased with increasing distance behind the walls.<br/

    Mitigation of railway induced ground vibration by heavy masses next to the track

    No full text
    The effectiveness of heavy masses next to the track as a measure for the reduction of railway induced ground vibration is investigated by means of numerical simulations. It is assumed that the heavy masses are placed in a continuous row along the track forming a wall. Such a continuous wall could be built as a gabion wall and also used as a noise barrier. Since the performance of mitigation measures on the transmission path strongly depends on local ground conditions, a parametric study is performed for a range of possible designs in a set of different ground types. A two-and-a-half dimensional coupled finite element–boundary element methodology is used, assuming that the geometry of the problem is uniform in the direction along the track. It is found that the heavy masses start to be effective above the mass–spring resonance frequency which is determined by the dynamic stiffness of the soil and the mass of the wall. At frequencies above this resonance frequency, masses at the soil?s surface hinder the propagation of surface waves. It is therefore beneficial to make the footprint of the masses as large and stiff as possible. For homogeneous soil conditions, the effectiveness is nearly independent of the distance behind the wall. In the case of a layered soil with a soft top layer, the vibration reduction strongly decreases with increasing distance from the wall

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    No full text
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    No full text
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Withdrawn by Author

    No full text
    &lt;p&gt;Withdrawn by Author&nbsp;&lt;/p&gt

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    No full text
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    Dr. Edward P. Wimberly, ITC, July 2011

    No full text
    This video is a conversation with Dr. Edward P. Wimberly. Dr. Wimberly talks about his book, "No Shame in Wesley's Gospel: A Twenty-First Century Pastoral Gospel". Brad Ost, AUC Woodruff Library, is the interviewer

    Author Rights and Scholarly Publishing

    No full text
    Originally posted at http://blog.library.gsu.edu/2014/10/24/author-rights-and-scholarly-publishing/</p
    corecore