1,721,061 research outputs found
Certova zed': Zivot a smrt Heinze Ruthy
This is a Czech translation of the original English edition of 2012. It includes a new introduction by the author. The translation has been carefully geared towards a Czech audienc
The Undermining of Austria-Hungary. The Battle for Hearts and Minds
This is a study of the lively battle of ideas which helped to destroy the Habsburg Empire during the First World War. It is a seminal study of propaganda with a focus on psychological warfare on the Italian and Eastern fronts, 1914-1918. It also explores how the external propaganda interacted with the internal disintegration of Austria-Hungary in 1917-1918 and supplies case studies of the Yugoslav regions of the Empir
Who Caused the War?: A pro-Serbian Polemic
Review of John Zametica, Folly and Malice : The Habsburg Empire, the Balkans and the Start of World War
'A pislakolo vilagitotorony': a trianoni beke brit megitelese
This article, currently being translated into Hungarian, re-evaluates British views of the Treaty of Trianon between 1918 and 1922. It focuses especially on the behaviour of British MPs and the attitudes of British observers in Budapest. Taking three chronological phases, it assseses the characteristics of each and demonstrates some of the hidden reasons for British policy-shifts
Introduction: The Southern Slav Question
Introduces and emphasizes the importance of the Southern Slav Question in understanding the causes of the First World WA
The end of the war in Northern Bohemia: a new diary
Analysis of the newly discovered diary of Ewald Mayer from the local archive in Liberec (Czech Republic). It sheds vivid light on the mentality of the Germans of Liberec in the last stages of the Second World War
Memoires de la Grande Guerre dans les pays tcheques 1918-1928
How Czech memory of the Great War was manipulated and propagated in the 1920
The flickering lighthouse: rethinking the British judgement on Trianon
This article reassesses the official British discourse around the Treaty of Trianon between 1919 and 1921. It studies a range of colorful opinions for and against the treaty, why they emerged at particular times, and why some could prevail over others. Especially it focuses on the rationale of those British parliamentarians or officials who spoke out against Trianon as being unjust to Hungary. These leading voices had varied backgrounds and prejudices, but they all had personal knowledge of Hungary either before or after World War I. The article is divided into three time-periods, thereby highlighting the main shifts in British opinion that were often caused by geo-political changes in Hungary itself. While the key British decisions were taken in 1919 at the time of the Paris Peace Conference, the vibrant and public British debate of 1920–21 also had a long-term impact: it sustained Hungarian hopes and illusions about a future revision of Trianon and about potential British sympathy. In fact, despite the strident voices heard during the British debate, the evidence suggests that there was more agreement among the British elite than some historians have suggested. By 1921, both opponents and supporters of Trianon had reached a certain pragmatic consensus; they recognized both the faults and the fairness of the peace settlement, but most now considered there could be no return to greater Hungary
Die Macht des Verfahrens: Englische Hochverratsprozesse 1554–1848, by André Krischer (Münster: Aschendorff Verlag, 2017
Review of this book by Andre Krischer about the evolving legal procedure in English treason trials from 1554 to 184
Enemies of the State
A study of 10 cases of treason, as handled by the British state from 1300 to 1960. The article shows the way that treason cases were manipulated by the state and the continuities in the law through six centuries
- …
