1,721,339 research outputs found

    Neurotensin: a physiological regulator of exocrine pancreatic secretion?

    No full text
    The aim of the present review was to evaluate the effects of neurotensin on the exocrine pancreatic secretion. Neurotensin immunoreactivity has been identified in the central nervous system and also in the digestive system, where it is found in specific endocrine cells of the intestinal mucosa (N cells), in nerve fibers of the enteric nervous system and in intrapancreatic ganglia (both in nerves and cell bodies). Studies in laboratory animals and in humans have demonstrated that the ingestion of a meal causes a significant release of neurotensin into the circulation and that exogenous administration of low doses of the peptide strongly stimulates exocrine pancreatic secretion. These findings, together with the demonstration that the immunoneutralization of circulating neurotensin significantly reduces the pancreatic secretory response to a meal, suggest that neurotensin is a physiological regulator of exocrine pancreatic secretion

    An unusual growth of an intraventricular meningioma: a case report

    No full text
    Intraventricular meningiomas are rare often histologically benign tumors arising most always from the trigonal region of the lateral ventricle. We report the first described case of a rapidly growing histologically benign intraventricular meningioma in a 68-year-old woman whose magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) executed 1 year before surgical operation was negative for intracranial mass lesio

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore