1,721,028 research outputs found
Successful salvage surgery after treatment failures with cross graft and free muscle transplant in facial reanimation.
No full textBACKGROUND: The microneurovascular transfer of a free-muscle transplant is the procedure of choice for facial animation, It is characterized by low morbidity in both adult and paediatric patients. In spite of the improvements in microsurgical techniques, failures due to absent revascularization or reinnervation of the transplanted muscle or infections causing flap necrosis are observed. We propose a second surgical procedure based on the gracilis muscle transplant reinnervated by the masseteric nerve as a solution for these cases.
METHODS: We analyzed and report on two patients treated in our department after the failure of a previous cross-facial nerve graft and free muscle transplant. They were treated with a new facial reanimation using the contralateral gracilis muscle and the masseteric nerve as the donor nerve.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: We did not observe any postoperative complications, and all of the flaps survived. Reinnervation and contraction of the muscle appeared 3-4 months postoperatively, with good functional and aesthetic results.
CONCLUSIONS: This technique is a one-step procedure characterized by reliable flap harvesting, low donor site morbidity and good activity of the masseteric nerve. We consider it as a good option for treatment of facial animation failures
Facelift approach for mandibular resection and reconstruction
No full textMandibular resection is the mainstay in the treatment of several pathologies involving the jaw. When benign lesions are approached, a limited exposure and less invasive access considering the cosmetic outcome is desirable to reduce morbidity and increase patient's quality of life after surgery. The facelift approach is widely used for rhytidectomy, parotidectomy, and facial animation procedures, whereas its use for mandibular resection and reconstruction is not described yet
Improving esthetic results in benign parotid surgery: statistical evaluation of facelift approach, sternocleidomastoid flap, and superficial musculoaponeurotic system flap application.
No full textPURPOSE: The purpose of this article was to analyze the efficacy of facelift incision, sternocleidomastoid muscle flap, and superficial musculoaponeurotic system flap for improving the esthetic results in patients undergoing partial parotidectomy for benign parotid tumor resection. The usefulness of partial parotidectomy is discussed, and a statistical evaluation of the esthetic results was performed.
PATIENT AND METHODS: From January 1, 1996, to January 1, 2007, 274 patients treated for benign parotid tumors were studied. Of these, 172 underwent partial parotidectomy. The 172 patients were divided into 4 groups: partial parotidectomy with classic or modified Blair incision without reconstruction (group 1), partial parotidectomy with facelift incision and without reconstruction (group 2), partial parotidectomy with facelift incision associated with sternocleidomastoid muscle flap (group 3), and partial parotidectomy with facelift incision associated with superficial musculoaponeurotic system flap (group 4). Patients were considered, after a follow-up of at least 18 months, for functional and esthetic evaluation. The functional outcome was assessed considering the facial nerve function, Frey syndrome, and recurrence. The esthetic evaluation was performed by inviting the patients and a blind panel of 1 surgeon and 2 secretaries of the department to give a score of 1 to 10 to assess the final cosmetic outcome. The statistical analysis was finally performed using the Mann-Whitney U test for nonparametric data to compare the different group results. P less than .05 was considered significant.
RESULTS: No recurrence developed in any of the 4 groups or in any of the 274 patients during the follow-up period. The statistical analysis, comparing group 1 and the other groups, revealed a highly significant statistical difference (P < .0001) for all groups. Also, when group 2 was compared with groups 3 and 4, the difference was highly significantly different statistically (P = .0018 for group 3 and P = .0005 for group 4). Finally, when groups 3 and 4 were compared, the difference was not statistically significant (P = .3467).
CONCLUSION: Partial parotidectomy is the real key point for improving esthetic results in benign parotid surgery. The evaluation of functional complications and the recurrence rate in this series of patients has confirmed that this technique can be safely used for parotid benign tumor resection. The use of a facelift incision alone led to a high statistically significant improvement in the esthetic outcome. When the facelift incision was used with reconstructive techniques, such as the sternocleidomastoid muscle flap or the superficial musculoaponeurotic system flap, the esthetic results improved further. Finally, no statistically significant difference resulted comparing the use of the superficial musculoaponeurotic system and the sternocleidomastoid muscle flap
Special Issue “New Updates in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery”
Get PDFIn the ever-evolving landscape of medical science, few fields have witnessed as profound a transformation as oral and maxillofacial surgery [...]
Masseteric-facial anastomosis and hypoglossal-facial anastomosis after lateral skull base and middle ear surgery
No full textIntroduction: Lateral skull base (LSB) and middle ear pathologies often involve the facial nerve (FN), and their treatment may require FN sacrifice. Cases with unidentifiable proximal stump or intact FN with complete FN palsy, necessitate FN anastomosis with another motor nerve in order to restore innervation to the mimicking musculature. The results of hypoglossal-to-facial nerve anastomosis (HFA) and masseteric-facial nerve anastomosis in patients with facial paralysis after middle ear and LSB surgeries, are presented and compared. Methods: Adult patients with total definitive facial paralysis after middle ear or LSB surgery undergoing facial nerve reanimation through hypoglossal or masseteric transfer anastomosis were enrolled. The facial nerve function was graded according to the House Brackmann grading system (HB). The facial function results at 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and at the last follow up (more than 18 months) are compared. Results: 153 cases of LSB and middle ear surgery presented postoperative facial palsy and underwent facial nerve reanimation surgery with HF in 85 patients (55.5%) and MF in 68 patients (44.5%). The duration of the FN palsy before reconstructive surgery was inversely associated to better FN results, in particular with having a grade III HB (p = 0.003). Both techniques had significantly lower HB scores when an interval between palsy onset and reanimation surgery was 6 months or less (MF p = 0.0401; HF p = 0.0022). Patients who underwent a MF presented significant improvement of the FN function at 3 months from surgery (p = 0.0078). At the last follow-up, 63.6% recovered to a grade III HB and 22.7% to a grade IV. On the other hand, the first significant results obtained in the HF group were at 6 months from surgery (p < 0.0001). 67.8% of patients had a grade III HB after a HF at the last follow-up, 28.8% a grade IV. FN grading at 6 months from surgery was significantly lower in the MF group compared to the HF (p = 0.0351). The two techniques had statistically similar results at later follow-up evaluations. Discussion/conclution: MF was associated to initial superior results, presenting significant facial recovery at 3 months, and significantly better functional outcomes at 6 months from surgery compared to HF. Although later results were not significantly different in this study, earlier results have an important role in order to limit the duration of risk of corneal exposure
Lymph node ratio (LNR) and lymph node yield (LNY) in head and neck cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Get PDFIntroduction: A growing amount of evidence points at lymph node yield (LNY) and lymph node ratio (LNR) as useful indicators in the prognostic evaluation of patients affected by head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) who require neck dissection. The aim of this study was to assess the importance of LNY and LNR in the prognostic evaluation of head and neck cancer patients. Materials and methods: Included studies were those examining LNY and/or LNR in head and neck cancer patients. We excluded case reports or case series, thyroid cancer or salivary gland cancer studies, a sample size less than 20, and studies with incomplete or missing survival estimate. Of the 2435 studies identified through a database search, 95 were reviewed for full text and 63 were finally included for the final analysis. Electronic databases, including PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, and Scopus were screened up to January 1, 2024. The systematic review was conducted according to the MOOSE checklist. A set of sub-group meta-analyses were performed for oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, larynx, and mixed subsites using a random-effects model. Overall survival (OS), Disease Specific Survival (DSS), and Disease-Free Survival (DFS) Hazard Ratios (HR) related to a prespecified LNR and LNY exact value were chosen as summary statistics. Cumulative Hazard Ratios with 95% Confidence Interval (CI) were presented, calculated through the inverse variance method. Heterogeneity was evaluated with I2 statistics. Results: Results of the meta-analysis showed increased OS for a higher LNY (HR 1.33 95% CI 1.23–1.45). Regarding the LNR, a lower LNR value has an impact on survival, with an OS HR of 1.96 (95% CI 1.72–2.24). The same was true for DFS (HR 2.43 95% CI 1.82–3.23), and DSS (HR 2.07 95% CI 1.83–2.33). Conclusions: Our analysis confirms the importance of LNY and LNR as prognostic indicators. Future studies are needed to establish the optimal cut-off values for both factors. LNY and LNR have the potential to be routinely evaluated in patients who undergo neck dissection for HNSCC
The masseteric nerve: a versatile power source in facial animation techniques.
No full textThe masseteric nerve has many advantages including low morbidity, its proximity to the facial nerve, the strong motor impulse, its reliability, and the fast reinnervation that is achievable in most patients. Reinnervation of a neuromuscular transplant is the main indication for its use, but it has been used for the treatment of recent facial palsies with satisfactory results. We have retrospectively evaluated 60 patients who had facial animation procedures using the masseteric nerve during the last 10 years. The patients included those with recent, and established or congenital, unilateral and bilateral palsies. The masseteric nerve was used for coaptation of the facial nerve either alone or in association with crossfacial nerve grafting, or for the reinnervation of gracilis neuromuscular transplants. Reinnervation was successful in all cases, the mean (range) time being 4 (2-5) months for facial nerve coaptation and 4 (3-7) months for neuromuscular transplants. Cosmesis was evaluated (moderate, n=10, good, n=30, and excellent, n=20) as was functional outcome (no case of impairment of masticatory function, all patients able to smile, and achievement of a smile independent from biting). The masseteric nerve has many uses, including in both recent, and established or congenital, cases. In some conditions it is the first line of treatment. The combination of combined techniques gives excellent results in unilateral palsies and should therefore be considered a valid option.
Copyright © 2014 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved
- …
